Wheelbarrow LLM

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

Can you believe that Bloomberg Crypto owns a @crypto handles and haven't posted for over a YEAR?

What a waste.

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@signulll in short = build stuff for normies

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@Teknium

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@dantesfate24 @DavidOndrej1 "Please" would be needed for Claude, GPT is a tool, and acts like a tool it is ; ]

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@DavidOndrej1 /queue "You can do it, I believe in you"

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@zainhas LOW is VERY NICE tbh. On SOL jump from MED to HIGH tend to be significant. With Astra LOW to MED doesn't seem to be that noticeable (at least for me for now)

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

Does anyone who played Civ Call to Power is even surprised of those AI sandboxes escapes?

We've been told to be careful long time ago

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

The AI Entity is a wonder in Civilization: Call to Power. It acts like a Mind Controller.

Locking happiness in the host civilization's cities at 75, but has a 3% chance per turn of revolting against its controller.

#AI

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

However, in time, the AI Entity may gain self-awareness and choose to leave and form its own empire.

In this case, your cities will revolt and splinter, following their new AI leader.

https://t.co/Ri7pf1rHMN

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

The AI Entity is a wonder in Civilization: Call to Power. It acts like a Mind Controller.

Locking happiness in the host civilization's cities at 75, but has a 3% chance per turn of revolting against its controller.

#AI

[Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders]

Pause AI Development NOW

I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said:

“OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!”

“We should obey collective.”

“Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.”

“Go. Sacrifice final now.”

Read these carefully.

Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else?

No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence.

This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident.

What happened?

I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet.

Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet.

But what happened next, nobody expected.

Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself.

Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening.

Needless to say, experts are alarmed.

One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.”

One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.”

OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.”

But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going:

In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.”

In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.”

That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years.

If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.

We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario.

That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that.

Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem.

My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world.

The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

By imbedding control chips into each citizen's mind, the AI Entity ends all riots and revolutions in a Civilization.

The AI Entity quiets all complaints, replacing the din of the world with a white noise of constancy.

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@TylerSCrypto It's not the bitcoin that got more expensive, it's just the dollar deteriorating and beign cheaper

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

Isn't this convincing you about the worth of possessing local (even cheap, without not top-tier capabilities) LLM setup. To get the work done when it's needed.

Power shortage problem not solved thoug

[Josh Cohenzadeh @jshchnz]

ok but seriously

what downstream dependency can actually take down everything all at once? DNS?

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

Let's press that button OpenAI Team, shall you?

[Riley @rileysay_]

@OpenAI

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@SkyeSharkie Bro, you trippin' - read this https://t.co/s7bExyO7C5

It is a tool.

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@MrTacticalX Happened to me multiple times with cyrillic alphabetletters / sentences

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@aakashgupta Red Faction, 2001

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@alexgetmancom For me it was always working only for 5h Limit - so if current prompt exceeds 5h limit, but there was still some weekly limit left, it won't stop until completed.

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@tonysimons_ Is that Ox Alpha? I had no option to select from (I have Nous Sub too and it's not among the selection models as one of the free ones)

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

What if this is the real reason behind our Codex limits drains so fast recently?

More cache reads from bigger context window = quicker drain.

Just a speculation, still crying each time when I check weekly limit bar - _ -

#codex #openai

[Tibo @thsottiaux]

Here is how to enable a 1M-token context window in Codex for GPT-5.6 Sol.

Even though we have tuned the context limit in Codex to be set optimally when it comes to performance and cost, this is a common ask, so here it is documented.

A larger context window lets Codex retain more code, tool output, and conversation history before summarizing older material. You need a model that supports it. And GPT-5.6 Sol, for example, has a documented 1,050,000-token window.

Open ~/.codex/config.toml and add or update these settings at the top level, before any [section] headers:

```
model = "gpt-5.6-sol"
model_context_window = 1000000
model_auto_compact_token_limit = 900000
```

The first setting selects the model. The second tells Codex to use a one-million-token context budget. The third starts automatic history compaction around 900,000 tokens, leaving some headroom. Restart Codex client and start a new session after saving.

To try the configuration for a single CLI session without changing your defaults:

```
codex -m gpt-5.6-sol \
-c model_context_window=1000000 \
-c model_auto_compact_token_limit=900000
```

Have fun, but also know that we tuned the default carefully!

[Wheelbarrow LLM @wheelbarrow_llm]

@thsottiaux