And there we have it.
Romanias president confirms that a drone targeting Ukraine was redirected by a Ukrainian air defence system and that’s why it hit Romania.
Read the comments under my original post for laughs.
I knew it this morning - no propaganda here.
AJEDREZ HÚNGARO QUE HACE LLORAR A BRUSELAS🤣
🇭🇺 Viktor Orbán coloca a su “traidor” de confianza y la UE cae en la trampa perfecta: el jaque mate que ha dejado humillados a Bruselas, Soros y Obama.
En un ejercicio de ajedrez político tan brillante que roza lo cómico, Viktor Orbán se olió desde hace tiempo que la Unión Europea, George Soros, Obama todo el club globalista iban a por él. Como en Hungría ya no quedaba oposición de izquierda que valiera (ninguno superó el ridículo 5% electoral), el primer ministro húngaro decidió resolver el problema a su manera: tomó a su mejor aliado y hombre de confianza, Péter Magyar, y lo mandó al frente como “opositor” de lujo.
El plan era tan simple como genial: Magyar, que hasta 2024 era pieza clave del gobierno orbánista, abandonó dramáticamente el barco, se hizo el disidente, recibió con gusto los fondos de los mismos euroburócratas que odian a Orbán y se presentó como la gran esperanza del “cambio”. La izquierda europea y sus mecenas cayeron en la trampa como moscas en miel. “¡Por fin!”, gritaron en Bruselas, mientras abrían la chequera. Nadie entendió nada, claro, porque casi nadie habla húngaro y los títulos de los medios occidentales eran demasiado bonitos para cuestionarlos.
Resultado, Magyar ganó. Y apenas puso un pie en el poder, el “traidor” reveló su verdadera cara. Declaró que la frontera “no es lo suficientemente fuerte”, rechazó el 90% de las exigencias de Ursula von der Leyen, priorizó los derechos de los húngaros étnicos y siguió, en la práctica, la misma línea soberanista que tanto molesta a la UE.
La Unión Europea, Soros, Obama y compañía pisaron el palito, soltaron la plata y ahora miran atónitos cómo el “cambio” que tanto celebraron es exactamente igual al Orbán de siempre, solo que con otro nombre. Jugada maestra. Ajedrez 5D en su máxima expresión. Y lo mejor: todo legal, todo limpio y todo delante de sus narices.
I don't know who needs to hear this, but if you eat the same amount of food as someone on Ozempic, you will lose the same amount of weight as someone on Ozempic.
@HialeahHodl@ZeeContrarian1 Buts what the intrinsic value, as per the original post. Your breakdown simply implies the hope that it will go up but that does not answer the question. Your only hope is demand increases and price goes up.
@GrantCardone Government and big players who understand long term markets but metals, retail hopefuls buying BTC just hoping to catch a wave. @GrantCardone follow the smart money. You always said cash flow only. What happened?
Gelje Sherpa, the man who was guiding a private client up Mt. Everest when he saw someone in distress near the summit. He went up, rolled him up in a sleeping mattress and gave him oxygen. He then strapped the man to his back and trekked 6 hours to safety
I debated posting this because it can make you feel hopeless.
But I think the truth is always best found out early.
Many financial gurus talk about investing $100/mo etc to get to a point with $1,000,00 when you retire.
The reality of the math is this - if inflation is 3% per year, that $1,000,000 isn’t worth $1,000,000 today.
Because compounding inflation is just as powerful as compounding returns.
Said differently $1,000,000 in 60 years is only worth $167,000 of today’s buying power with 3% inflation.
And typically w late stage capitalism, rate of inflation increases (not decreases).
So what does this mean in reality?
You have to 6x your goal.
Ex: if you wanted to retire with $1,000,000 and $40,000 per year passive, you actually want $6,000,000 and $240,000 per year passive.
If you wanted $4,000,000 and $200,000 in passive income. You really need your goal to be $24,000,000 and $1,2000,000 in passive income.
Now let’s say inflation is 2.3% rather than 3% (the historical average). Okay. You’ll have overshot your goal by 50% (money will only be 1/4 as valuable rather than 1/6th).
Great. Retire early.
But the alternative is certainly worse. Undershoot and be a burden to the people you care about hoping for social nets which may or may not exist then. Who knows.
Regardless, I’ve never seen anyone talk about this - and maybe it’s because it makes people feel hopeless.
But I figure math is math and you shouldn’t be afraid to do it for yourself.
Always better to overshoot and get there early than never arrive.
Three years ago today, Elon Musk bought Twitter and the media said it would die under Elon.
Today, it’s the #1 source of news in the world and it’s the media who is dying.