@ClimateDann @GarethSJones1 @Nature Add another Nature paper later on this year, too. It's a great model, you can actually do experiments with it. That's to say: run it, change one thing, run it again and compare the results. All in a sensible time frame with more or less reliable results.
@steveatearth This is an awesome idea. To game the system everyone would start writing environment statements about how terrible their University/Dept/UoA is. I'd love to watch the VCs then trying to spin their REF results.
📢2-year PDRA opportunity📢 We are looking for a researcher to study tropical Pacific paleoclimate. This is part of the 3-year NERC-funded project PROMS (Pacific Rainfall over Millennial Scales) led by Prof David Sear in Geography. Deadline 04.05.22 (1/4)
https://t.co/w8KxXPxQVu
I've had numerous discussions with my Dad about why the EA is "useless". As I keep saying to him, it's not the staff it's the organisation itself. EPA is put in the same position too.
https://t.co/ZrEeGJmAMZ
Can anyone give me any example of a centrally managed improvement process that has actually improved that which it was designed to improve? There must be an example somewhere. Currently living through a counter-example, and am trying to be positive.
turns out I run faster after departmental management meetings than after a mornings of research. could there be a reason for this or is it just chance?
@DrMichaelByrne Finest time resolution I'm aware of is the annual/seasonal cycle, nothing down to days. I'm working with some folk on a record like this right now...
the maples and cherries along the @My_Metro between walkergate and north shields are looking fantastic this year. #lowrailadhesion means you get to enjoy it even longer
Currently reviewing a paper by PhD student that has clearly not been read by any of the "advising" team. How do you politely say to the poor student that the paper needs _a lot_ of work while impolitely telling the co-authors to do their f!"£$ing job?