I must be getting old.
I no longer want a language with 273 overlapping features to master to become a software wizard.
I want a language with 15 features that compose and work well together.
Lower standards so a larger fraction of papers are accepted? That decreases the average quality of publications. An alternative that *increases* quality of publications is to encourage journal publications: polished versions of the best papers. 2/2
Some research areas (like PL) look bad on naive metrics because publication LPUs are larger and researchers look less productive. Incentives for hiring and promotion become distorted when metrics like paper counts and citations are applied. Solution? 1/2
TIL there are multiple people whose names are on 20+ (a max of 33!) papers submitted to a single conference. I am curious what that community chooses to do, or not do, next. https://t.co/HJnCmj7d7U
Oh for goodness sake, Apple is still parsing untrusted TrueType fonts using an old pile of C code in 2023.
TrueType is not that hard to parse in a safe language if you don't need hinting, folks (which is disabled on iOS). In fact I wrote most of that code a few years ago.
Join @whileydave, a researcher in smart contracts at @ConsenSys, and learn how formal verification of smart contracts has the potential to significantly improve their security and reliability! 🔐
🗓️https://t.co/LmvsmBhFcA
Finally found a good use for the `by method` syntax in Dafny. The method implementation does not stack overflow on large sequences (whereas the function does on the Java backend as its not tail recursive). Mind = 🤯
From the ICSE23 website: "Equity at its heart is about removing barriers, biases, and obstacles that impede equal access and opportunity to succeed" . Also, I just paid >AUD 3K in fees to attend. I won't be able to ever do this again. #icse2023.
@stevemblackburn@samth Well, I certainly don’t view venues in that binary fashion. Papers from PLDI can be (and often are) junk. Likewise, papers from a strange workshop can be amazing! Still, I understand the issue. Not sure what can be done about it though 🤷♂️
Perverse incentives promote perverse behavior.
Our community's ever-growing obsession with publication at a few select venues is a blight on our field.
It is harming quality research in "secondary" areas.
It is fueling unethical behavior among researchers.