White Mountain Red

formerly 90% peanut butter

[Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator. @RudyHavenstein]

Health insurance premiums are my biggest expense (and #1 for many), yet the @BLS_gov doesn't even measure them.

[Health Freedom Defense Fund @theHFDF]

Leslie Manookian just said the quiet part out loud.

“The federal government doesn’t exist to protect us.”

“They exist to protect state and corporate interests.”

“And I think the only path forward at this point is very clear, broad, unequivocal resistance and non-compliance.”

“It’s common sense that you get to make your own medical choices.”

“This has been a common law understanding for hundreds and hundreds of years.”

“In fact, if you just touch someone unwanted, that is considered a battery.”

“Yet we’re saying that it’s okay to force people to be injected with something that could kill them.”

In February, we conducted a poll alongside the Brownstone Institute on medical freedom.

The result?

Americans overwhelmingly support medical freedom.

“91% of Americans across party lines support the right to informed consent for all medical interventions.”

“Including vaccinations.”

“And 87% believe that medical freedom should be codified in law.”

Yet in Washington, medical freedom is considered “fringe.”

It could not be more clear that the federal government only exists to “protect state interests against the people that they are supposed to represent.”

@LeslieManookian @RCR_NZ

[Morgan @MorganC000]

Do you see it yet?

This is what happens when communities stand in the way of major projects.

First comes the pressure.

Then the consultation battles.

Then the evacuation orders.

Then the land is burned, access is disrupted, communities are displaced, and the same development interests remain waiting beneath the ash.

That does not prove who started the fires.

It does make the pattern impossible to ignore.

When First Nations communities resist mines, roads, transmission corridors and resource extraction, Canadians should be asking who benefits from their displacement.

Instead, they are busy yapping about land acknowledgments while entire communities burn. If they didn’t demand a fire response when Jasper burned they’re not going to give two shits about Northern Ontario reserves.

Follow the projects.

Follow the land.

Follow who gains when resistance is removed.

[sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" @sasha_latypova]

Full article in comments👇

[Mr. Sausage @MrSausageGet]

Fuck this shit

[Champagne Joshi @JoshWalkos]

When Dr. Erica Schwartz left federal service in April 2021, she cashed in fast, landing a lucrative UnitedHealth executive role, corporate board seats, stock awards, and millions in healthcare equity.

Now she is nominated to lead the CDC and the revolving door keeps on spinning.

[Carole Mac @HerbsandDirt]

All new military recruits are REQUIRED to have a flu shot now in 2026.

All deployed troops are required to have a flu shot as well.

It’s almost like they want our military to be compromised.

[Toby Rogers @uTobian]

I'm not "vaccine hesitant."
I'm a vaccine abolitionist.

[White Mountain Red @whitemntred]

@SanjoyMahajan2 Funneling public resources/money into private control/profit via its power to tax backed up by a monopoly on violence is the modus operandi of capitalist states. They crushed socialist governments/movements that struggled for/created an alternative where the people benefited.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Dr. Schwartz indeed has an impressive record of service crushing rights with vaccines mandates and discipling those who dare decline these products.

She led nationwide Covid-19 vaccine deployment and has a long track record of directly issuing rights-crushing civilian and military vaccine mandates, including mandating injection of smallpox, anthrax, and flu vaccines. She even disciplined those that refused.

She then added to that impressive record by becoming an executive at UnitedHealthcare Group.

It is impressive how even under this administration industry will get their pick: someone who cannot possibly objectively oversee CDC’s vaccine program which has, between 1986 and the 2026, gone from 3 injections to 29 injections, including in utero, by an infant’s first birthday, while chronic childhood disease has gone from under 10% to over 40% of children, most related to immune system dysregulation.

SOURCES: For examples of Schwartz mandating vaccines, see: https://t.co/CzaVaPLDNA https://t.co/g3l8HWVLyN https://t.co/9maw4rP18x For increase in vaccine schedule, see: https://t.co/yIcSqGaMIJ; https://t.co/0pzVK3LdPk (https://t.co/XHXxt8SQIO); https://t.co/Dt6pnub5Bg (https://t.co/DtRqnwfp65). The 29 injections in 2026 only include routine vaccines and the Covid-19 vaccine. Also see table on page 37 of Vacines, Amen. For rise in chronic health, see: https://t.co/4NfPxZNdkh (https://t.co/guZorU5jOu)(“According to data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) [1979-1981] over two million children under 17 years (3.8%) are afflicted by chronic conditions that cause some limitation of activ-ity.”); https://t.co/PSkLotGVm9 (https://t.co/IQr40hF4GK) (“Data from the National Health Interview Survey indicate that the prevalence of activity-lim-iting chronic conditions among children under age 17 years doubled between 1960 and 1981, from 1.8 to 3.8 per cent.”); https://t.co/hovGkzgRpo (https://t.co/YX9zR9Rj6H) (Among “children younger than 18 years who were included in the 1992-1994 National Health Interview Survey … [a] significant proportion of children, estimated at 6.5% of all US children, experienced some degree of disability.”); https://t.co/fOAHzcfAI2 (https://t.co/nuGSyYRgkW) (“Chronic diseases are defined broadly as conditions that last 1 year or more and require ongoing medical attention or limit activities of daily living or both.”); https://t.co/JRVlTEWxOO (https://t.co/RWJdVhijPZ) (The 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health found that: “An estimated 43% of US children (32 million) currently have at least 1 of 20 chronic health conditions assessed, increasing to 54.1% when overweight, obesity, or being at risk for developmental delays are included.”); https://t.co/Uw3WIGamt4 (https://t.co/BXWDTdredC) (Only considering a “condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” or a “functional/ activity limitation related to a condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” from the National Health Interview Survey data it found that children falling into this category “has risen from 22.57% in 1999/2000 to 30.21% in 2017/2018”); https://www.cdc. gov/school-health-conditions/chronic-conditions/index.html (https://t.co/mtMYd5bfUc) (“In the United States, more than 40% of school-aged children and adolescents have at least one chronic health condition”); See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources. For relationship of chronic health issues to immune system dysregulation, see among other sources: https://t.co/74V5QjE8MO; https://t.co/NpiHhocjio (https://t.co/i7CSzDuBsn); https://t.co/WbNXbZ9rsV (https://t.co/ZKuQqJi3pz); https://t.co/RziRLaE6hO (https://t.co/HfNSe5RJeR); https://t.co/RVOKOU0h8L (https://t.co/aScYnpwZ45); https://t.co/R9E0DALVIU (https://t.co/yWZr7CJKvN); https://t.co/Kq3CR19uBf (https://t.co/qlqHxKBdns). See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources. https://t.co/U8MCPBkb46

[Health Freedom Defense Fund @theHFDF]

EXPOSED:

For 50 years, you’ve been lied to about Ebola.

The truth is darker than you think.

Much darker.

Deadly corporate malfeasance.

Mass pharmaceutical poisoning.

And a 50-year propaganda campaign to cover it all up.

To expose the real story of Ebola, we have to go all the way back to 1912.

Bookmark this thread.

The media is already spreading fear about Ebola as a possible “global health emergency.”

So you need to know the truth about this psyop.

🧵

[fike @FikeMairles]

Pat Tillman was shot 3 times in the back of the head from 10m by a fellow soldier after he started speaking publicly against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And we dilute his memory on purpose each year. Makes me sick.

[Jonathan Cook @Jonathan_K_Cook]

Since some two million people took to the streets to oppose Britain’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, new ways have been found to restrict the ability of ordinary citizens to raise their voice against the abuse of governmental and state power.

Recent legislation allows police to ban protests because they are “too noisy” or cause “serious unease”. Disruption has been redefined to now include hindrance to any daily activity. Protests can be barred if they have a “cumulative” impact.

These are all inherent features of protest. The mass demonstrations against Britain’s illegal attack on Iraq were noisy, disruptive and repeated – as have been the marches against Britain’s collusion in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

By judging the legality of protest according to these selective and largely subjective criteria, the state has given the police huge latitude to decide which protests should be criminalised and which allowed.

It is hardly surprising then that the police are currently concentrating their efforts on the anti-genocide marches, which highlight British collusion in Israel’s crimes.

Facial recognition technology – pioneered by Israel against Palestinians – is being rolled out too, normalising the Big Brother, "panopticon" state recently advocated for by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood.

Where is all of this leading? The answer is to a new piece of legislation that was hurried through parliament by Mahmood.

The National Security (State Threats) Act gives the state unprecedented powers to proscribe groups, as it did with Palestine Action, but now without having to claim to have evidence of a terrorist threat.

The home secretary can make such a designation unilaterally, without any parliamentary oversight, simply because he or she claims the group is a “hostile” foreign state actor that poses a threat to national security or public safety.

Mahmood has already done so with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), effectively Iran’s military.

Further, anyone who works with or receives a “material benefit” – defined to include “information” – from a proscribed group can be jailed for up to 14 years. That includes expressing support for the group or sharing information it has provided.

Simply hosting an event where someone expresses support for the group could open one to prosecution, as could posting something on social media that the British state claims is a hostile foreign state “talking point” – whether or not the information is true.

Once again, this is an assault on the most fundamental of Enlightenment values.

In the National Security Act, it matters only who is passing on the information, not what the information is, or whether it is truthful. There is no public interest defence, such as exposure of criminality by the British state or its allies.

There is no exemption for journalists, lawyers, scholars or human rights groups. It will be impossible for them to do the most essential part of their job: digging out information, testing claims from one side against the other’s, and allowing audiences to determine the truth.

Assuming Hamas is declared a hostile foreign actor, as seems all but certain, journalists will be barred from collecting details of Palestinian casualties from Gaza’s health ministry or speak to doctors there. Why? Because the Hamas government runs the health ministry and hospitals.

Worse, it would be impossible for journalists to visit Gaza to investigate Israeli crimes – something that will delight Israel – because such a visit would need to be organised through the Hamas government. To do so would risk 14 years in jail.

The same will be true for reporting from Iran or Russia, if the home secretary so decides.

The only apparent carve-out will be for journalists who get approval from the British government beforehand.

That should ensure that only the most compliant, access-driven journalists, belonging to state and billionaire-owned media, will be able to engage with “hostile” foreign actors – in ways the British state can be sure will best represent its interests.

Under this new law, the search for truth, and potentially the truth itself, will be criminalised.

This is an extract from my latest article Britain's Big Brother state is already here - we just don't realise it yet. Find a link to the rest in the reply post below ⬇️

[White Mountain Red @whitemntred]

@SanjoyMahajan2 @MidwesternDoc Long suspected “him”…

[sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" @sasha_latypova]

There is no "lying for truth", ok? No such thing. I am not interested in preaching and I am not interested in any "base". Truth is an extreme radical position, there is only one truth and many lies. In case of endangering peoples lives, this is very black and white. I can give some grey when the stakes are not life and death or disability of children. You are confirming what I said - you are willing to tell people that "sometimes poisoning has pros" ONLY because you need to increase you "reach", i.e. you commercial interests, whether that's directly paid or indirectly or some other incentive. That's transactionalism. It's WRONG.

[Marl Karx @BareLeft]

Selling off public assets cheap will do that.

The problem with Capitalism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

[Toby Rogers @uTobian]

You really have to hand it to Big Pharma for picking a Black, Jewish (by marriage?), woman to implement their plan to enslave and genocide the American working class via mRNA vaccines. Three historically oppressed groups in one and here she is laughing about the mRNA Holocaust.

[sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" @sasha_latypova]

It is not a difficult question AT ALL. Anyone who tells you "it's complicated" - is a proven liar whoring for pharma money. They are not on your side, they are on the side of the poisoners. They are luring you in like a shy prey, overcoming your "vaccine hesitancy", by putting out a bunch of good content and then inserting these CDC-sponsored messages. Yes, Johns Hopkins has a whole policy manual on how to do exactly this type of messaging targeted at the "vaccine hesitant".

You should not be vaccine hesitant, you should be 100% vaccine hostile.

There are no "safe" vaccines. All vaccines are intentional poisons. All mechanisms of poisoning have been known and meticulously studied by the poisoners for at least 150 years. Anyone who tries to sell you "pros and cons" is a con themselves.
End of PSA.

[sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" @sasha_latypova]

These are just terminations of EUAs, because they "fully approved" (illegally issued NDAs and BLAs) for countermeasures such as mRNA shots. These are unlawful (sometimes meaningless) acts, until the PREP Act declaration for covid is extended. RFK has not terminated it. He continues to shield the crime cartel. The only way these are lawful revocations of EUA is for manufacturers that stop shipping these products entirely.