The members of @FurnivalLaw Furnival Chambers, have unanimously agreed not to accept returns in defence legal aid work in line with the @TheCriminalBar protocol.
96.5% declared that, unless Government committed to a substantial increase of additional annual funding to the AGFS of above £35 million / 15% (the minimum increase recommended by the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid (CLAR)), action should be taken to include no returns.
@DVLAgovuk Thanks, Rob! I understand you guys are busy. It’s case reference number 05819085. In my latest response, I have provided a non-GB fax and postal address. Can a dated copy of my driving record to be sent to both, Please. Thank you.
@DVLAgovuk what’s going on?! I’ve been trying to talk to someone now for 2 weeks! Phones unanswered. Chat unanswered. Emails not properly read and considered when I’ve already provided you with the information you have asked for.
Sam Stockwell secures a conditional discharge for client charged with possession of a shotgun, rifle, taser & disguised taser, successfully arguing, in the first instance, that the mandatory minimum sentence shouldn’t apply. Instructed by Kiran Johal of Stuart Miller Solicitors.
The Crown’s case relied on evidence of the complainant, who was shot at point blank range, cell site expert evidence, ANPR & CCTV evidence and ran to pages of evidence measured in the hundreds of thousands. Ben & Sam were instructed by Simon O’Meara of Cartwright King Solicitors.
In a ‘cut throat’ defence, where all 5 defts gave evidence, Ben & Sam's client was the only deft to be acquitted of the attempted murder and firearms offences arising from that incident. The case centred around the acquisition & use of a pistol & shotgun in 2 separate incidents.
Ben Gordon, leading Sam Stockwell, secure unanimous acquittals for charges of attempted murder, GBH S18, possessing a firearm with intent to endanger life, criminal damage & possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence, after a trial lasting 6 weeks at Harrow CC.
There are 57,516 cases outstanding in the Crown Court, it was 39,331 pre-covid. Again, whilst the figures bob up and down a little, no progress is being made in shifting this backlog. This is because no money is being spent. A new financial year has begun, so lets see.
@DavidLammy suggests smaller juries and benchmarking against conviction rates, or rather that some are “getting away with it.” I’m just not sure where to start with this.