@b67105@MaxNordau@allchronology So there you have it: There is no real answer. None of those nuances matter when neither side will relent, regardless of which side you think is right or just. Nobody is packing up. The only thing that I know is that there is no perceivable answer ๐คท
@b67105@MaxNordau@allchronology Sorry man, you're still whitewashing the true fundamental issue that I laid out. What is the outcome when you have two separate groups that both stake claim to something and refuse to compromise or relent? That is the ultimate question. The rest is noise.
@b67105@MaxNordau@allchronology Absolutely not. What you're saying is merely smoke and mirrors. My question is the very core and root of the issue with all the bullshit stripped away. Also, you do realize that entire segments of the Israeli population are exempt from service?
@b67105@MaxNordau@allchronology It isn't dishonest at all and certainly doesn't ignore the plight of anyone at all. It's actually a very honest and straightforward question and the very root of the issue.
@b67105@MaxNordau@allchronology You're asking the wrong question. It should be, "What is the desired end state of both parties?" Israel refuses to cease to exist and the Palestinians refuse to accept the existence of Israel. Is there an outcome of that scenario other than a genocide of one side by the other?
@rcivian@Yaronyn@ezzingaza As for the border, October 7th and plenty of public statements of intent to murder, loot, and plunder more than justify any actions taken to repel mass congregations at the border
@thesyrianpath@ncole_r@Fidias0 Sorry man, that's not being objective. The only thing zero sum in this world is that we're all going to kick the bucket one day.
@RebelPatriot@RNCResearch I have my doubts... "I'm surrounded by idiots" best describes how I feel. It's as if common decency, morals, and self respect have just totally dissolved. This guy's take is almost horrific to me, how can you be a member of Congress, no less, and have such disdain for country?
@thesyrianpath@ncole_r@Fidias0 What?? How can you possibly conflate the two? One is a valid, documented legal transaction. The other is a universally disputed settlement apparatus. Both can coexist.
@RebelPatriot@RNCResearch It is, it truly is. I mean, one of the rationales behind the electoral college is to theoretically prevent someone unfit for office from taking office. But that obviously only applies to the presidency, not these offices. So what can we do? What is the endgame?
@thesyrianpath@ncole_r@Fidias0 Sorry that's total bullshit. Post WWI is British Mandate period and the transactions were carried out within the legal framework of that era (and prior).
@RIUU22@ncole_r@Fidias0 Why does this even matter? The Cypriots have democracy, a government and politicians, they can change their laws if it's so important to them.