Shooter McGavin

I eat pieces of sh*t like you for breakfast!

[Seth Dillon @SethDillon]

This is just painfully bad. Maybe the awful family is meant to distract from the terrible product?

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@leadlagreport The thesis of they will crash stocks to save bonds may need to be updated to they will crash the dollar to save bonds. Mr. Market is Bessent and Trump’s Alamo it seems.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@TraderJonesy @RamenOrRibeye Like the dumbasses that longed at 6600 when you were sure it was going down? Maybe no system knows what’s happening in the age of grift and fraud? But at least your stress tests’ go back to 2020. Cause everything has been totally normal since then. Have a little humility my dude.

[Mike Levin @MikeLevin]

This is so insanely corrupt, I can’t even believe it.

More than half the donors to Trump’s $400 million White House ballroom just won over $50 billion in new federal contracts in six months.

And here’s the part that should make your blood boil.

Sixteen of these 27 donors were facing federal enforcement actions, antitrust reviews, labor cases, securities charges. Many of those cases have been quietly dropped or scaled back since Trump took office. You write a check, your legal problems disappear. That’s not a coincidence.

The White House won’t even release the full donor list. They’re hiding it on purpose, because daylight is the one thing pay-to-play can’t survive. A federal judge already ruled ballroom construction has to stop until Congress authorizes it.

Government is supposed to serve the people, not auction itself off to the highest bidder. When access goes to whoever pays the most, working families always end up paying the price.

We either end the corruption, or the corruption will end us.

https://t.co/4MGFzSseFl

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@JulietteJDI @sweatystartup Yup. Winner take all proposition as we head into the largest CAPEX spending cycle in history. For all our sakes, this kind of needs to work out.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@JulietteJDI @sweatystartup Think the actual meaningful headline is that in order for AI firms to have a chance at profitability, token based billing is required. That’s where the true demand for AI will be tested after the subsidized AI period ends.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@Alice_MiaX A Bitcoin in 2-6 months?

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@Speculator_io Perfect chart to show the difference of a price bubble and an earnings bubble. First hyperscaler to sneeze and slow capex brings the party to an end. Until then, party on with the circular financing circle jerk of infinite demand and dollars.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

If you were forced to tell the truth and not just grift:

We got cocky after Venezuela, thought this would be a walk in the park, and now are ready to capitulate to a worse situation because at the end of the day this is about pumping asset prices for you and your buddies. F*ck the poor, am I right?

You guys had an opportunity to do some real good this second term, but the insider trading opportunities became just too juicy to pass up? Buy ETH here?

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@_The_Prophet__ I mean, what about when he said the straight was opened up and free weeks ago and then it wasn’t. Was that because he was confident in a final deal?

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@rationalNDfan Only hurts ND with that argument. Don’t get dog walked by a team you don’t think is good.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@KayceSmith It’s almost like playing exclusively the bottom half of the SEC doesn’t prepare you for just an ok SEC team? Bummer it happened to be a rival to ruin a perfect season and send you into the playoffs with that good ole battered Aggie syndrome.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@SenSanders I had no opinion on the shut down, now I guess I am for it. If all of you are useless and do nothing good but spend us into oblivion, I think shutting it down makes sense.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

Just since you seem to be throwing stones wearing glass capri pants....

Grok, has Joe Walsh used the term they to discuss conservatives being bad, dangerous or fascists?

Enjoy...

Walsh's posts consistently frame "they" as collective references to the conservative ecosystem under Trump—voters, politicians, media figures, and the party itself—rather than individuals. He rarely uses "they" for traditional pre-Trump conservatives, focusing instead on the "radicalized" MAGA/GOP as fascistic and dangerous. Searches returned dozens of similar examples, confirming this is a recurring theme in his commentary since at least 2020.Yes, Joe Walsh (@WalshFreedom), the former Republican Congressman and vocal anti-Trump critic, has frequently used the term "they" in his X posts to refer to conservatives, Republicans, the GOP, Trump supporters (MAGA), and related groups as bad, dangerous, or fascists. His rhetoric often portrays the modern Republican Party and its base as an authoritarian cult, enablers of fascism, radicalized threats to democracy, and morally bankrupt figures who normalize violence and dictatorship. This pattern spans years of posts, with "they" serving as a pronoun for these groups in sentences that directly tie them to negative descriptors.Below are key examples from his X account, focusing on instances where "they" explicitly or contextually refers to conservatives/Republicans in the manner described. These are drawn from a search of his posts using keywords like "they" combined with terms such as conservative, Republican, GOP, Trump, MAGA, fascist, dangerous, threat, bad, evil, authoritarian, and dictator.Examples Using "They" to Label Conservatives/Republicans as Fascists or AuthoritariansAugust 20, 2025: "My new political party is hemorrhaging voters. My former political party, now full on fascist, is gaining voters. Dems need to wake the fuck up. Dems have been out of touch & too far left. They’ve lost regular folks & they’ve lost folks in the middle. To a GOP that is an authoritarian-embracing cult."
Here, "they" refers to Democrats losing ground to a "full on fascist" and "authoritarian-embracing" GOP (conservatives/Republicans).
August 1, 2025: "Trump is a fascist. And like all fascists, Trump gets away with doing fascist things bcuz people appease, enable, & capitulate to the fascist. So we must call THEM out. We must constantly call out the fascist’s enablers. It’s a long, growing list. Shame on you CBS. Shame on you Harvard. Shame on you congressional Republicans. Shame on you Smithsonian."
"Them" (capitalized for emphasis) directly points to enablers of fascism, including "congressional Republicans" (core conservatives).
July 23, 2025: "Hey my fellow Democrats, take it from this former Republican. Republicans will fight to the death to turn America into a white, Christian, authoritarian country. And they do not believe Democrats will fight back hard enough to stop them."
"They" refers to Republicans (conservatives) pursuing an "authoritarian" agenda.
April 3, 2025: "Don’t blame just Trump for this. Blame every congressional Republican. They own this tariff disaster too. In fact, they own every stupid, ignorant, cruel, authoritarian, un-American thing Trump does. Cowards. Enablers. Accomplices."
"They" explicitly means congressional Republicans, described as owning "authoritarian" actions.
March 30, 2025: "Trump saying he’s serious about running for a 3rd term isn’t funny & must not be normalized. They are the words of an authoritarian who believes he can say & do anything. They are the words of someone who doesn’t give a fuck about the Constitution."
"They" refers to Trump's statements, but in context, it implicates his conservative/MAGA supporters who enable this authoritarianism.
February 4, 2025: "Let the record show that this Republican Party, a party I spent almost my entire adult life in, is now so universally an authoritarian-embracing cult solely devoted to Trump, that they will actually put a Russian asset in charge of America’s intelligence."
"They" denotes the Republican Party (conservatives) as an "authoritarian-embracing cult."
February 8, 2025: "State run media. What every good authoritarian does. And btw, Trump & his people are such snowflakes. They’re so easily offended."
"They" targets Trump and his conservative allies as authoritarians who act like "snowflakes."
January 28, 2025: "Democrats are afraid of Trump. They’re afraid to call him out for the lawless, cruel authoritarian that he is. They’re afraid to fight him."
While primarily about Democrats, the post contrasts with Trump as an "authoritarian," and earlier posts in the thread use "they" for Republicans enabling him.
September 7, 2025: "“How did the United States of America ever put a fascist in the White House,” they will ask. Bcuz way too many people normalized his fascism. Bcuz way too many people enabled his fascism."
"They" here refers to future historians questioning how conservatives/Republicans enabled fascism.
Examples Using "They" to Label Conservatives/Republicans as Bad, Dangerous, or ThreatsAugust 27, 2025: "That so many Americans who voted for Trump actually WANT a dictator, an authoritarian, a strongman to rule over them & rule over this country has never surprised me. Bcuz for yrs, his voters have told me they wanted this. Yes, it’s hugely disappointing, but not at all surprising."
"They" (Trump voters, i.e., conservative base) are portrayed as wanting a "dictator" and "authoritarian," making them dangerous.
September 19, 2025: "Our political leaders & media voices must choose. Either use this latest act of political violence to further divide & inflame the American people or de-escalate. Either be irresponsibly partisan or acknowledge the truth that NEITHER side has a monopoly on political violence and ALL sides must stop engaging in violence."
In context of broader threads, "they" often implicates radicalized conservatives as inflaming violence, tying into his repeated warnings about the GOP base.
June 22, 2025: "Hegseth just spent ten minutes on his knees publicly worshipping Trump. This is why these people just can’t be taken seriously. And why they’re so dangerous."
"They" refers to Trump-aligned conservatives like Hegseth as "dangerous."
June 10, 2025: "Trump’s DHS Secretary just called America’s 2nd largest city a “city of criminals.” Trump and his people are bad, divisive people. Fuck them."
"Them" targets Trump and his conservative administration as "bad, divisive people."
June 5, 2025: "I honestly didn’t think it would come to this. My bad. Because I forgot that Trump is a pathologically narcissistic idiot, and Elon is a really bad dude/really sick dude. So I suppose it was always gonna come to this. Well, they deserve each other. And America deserves better."
"They" lumps Trump (and by extension, his conservative supporters) with bad actors.
May 6, 2025: "They Know Trump’s a Bad Guy — And They Don’t Care. BUT They Can Still Be Reached."
The title and content use "they" for Trump supporters (conservatives/MAGA) who know he's "bad" but ignore it, portraying them as willfully dangerous.
January 19, 2025: "This is the essence of Trumpism/MAGA. To them, the U.S. government is every bit as bad, corrupt, & evil as the communist Chinese government & the dictatorial Putin government... Trumpism/MAGA is wrong. Dead wrong."
"Them" refers to MAGA conservatives as viewing America as "bad, corrupt, & evil," which Walsh calls out as dangerous misinformation.
January 15, 2025: "This is no moral relevance kind of thing. No. It’s worse than that. Today’s Republican Party doesn’t believe Russia is the bad guy. They just don’t."
"They" (Republicans/conservatives) are depicted as morally bad for not seeing Russia (and by implication, themselves) as threats.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@AdamKinzinger Honestly, it's almost admirable how off the mark you continually are. Touché.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

Out of curiosity, you think your rhetoric has been helpful or hurtful in fueling mentally-ill followers to act on them? Grok can now spot check you. Has Seth Moulton referred to Trump or conservatives as Fascists? Enjoy the receipts. Maybe dial your sh*t a bit so that people don't read your tweets and think violence is needed to stop it?

But today, Trump needs to be Presidential and come together with Republicans as now we are back to just political disagreements? So you don't believe that he's a fascist threat to America?

See how this could get confusing to someone that is mentally ill and doesn't realize you are just grifting for more personal power and don't believe he's an existential threat to America?

From Grok:
Yes, Rep. Seth Moulton has used the term "fascism" or "fascist" in his X posts in ways that directly or implicitly link it to Donald Trump or conservative-aligned figures and movements.

These examples span from 2017 to 2025, showing consistency in his rhetoric. Searches of his X account (over 30 keyword-based posts and 20 semantically similar ones) yielded no additional direct hits beyond these, but they substantiate affirmative instances.Yes, Rep. Seth Moulton has used the term "fascism" or "fascist" in his X posts in ways that directly or implicitly link it to Donald Trump or conservative-aligned figures and movements. While he does not appear to have broadly labeled all "conservatives" as fascists, he has repeatedly invoked fascist rhetoric, tactics, and threats in reference to Trump personally, Trump's administration, and elements within the Republican Party under Trump's influence (e.g., MAGA, white nationalists, and authoritarian tendencies). Below are key examples from his posts, drawn from a comprehensive search of his account

(@sethmoulton):Direct References to Trump and FascismJune 7, 2017: Moulton posted: "Trump's tactics aren't normal – or new. VPOTUS Wallace had this to say about fascism in 1944. Sound familiar?" Accompanied by an image (likely a historical quote comparing wartime tactics to fascism), this explicitly draws a parallel between Trump's behavior and fascism.

October 31, 2018: In a post about global nationalism, Moulton wrote: "The disturbing rise of nativism and nationalism around the world will not end with the Trump Presidency. Our leaders must continue to fight for the principles of liberal democracy to defeat the forces of fascism that threaten our safety in the 21st century." This positions Trump's presidency as part of a fascist-adjacent global trend.

References to Fascist Apologists or Tactics in the Republican/Trump ContextSeptember 8, 2025: Moulton stated: "If you’re looking for someone to cooperate with fascist apologists, don’t ask a faithful Marine." This was in response to a video clip (likely political commentary), implicitly criticizing cooperation with Trump-aligned Republicans by associating them with "fascist apologists."

July 21, 2020: On events in Portland, he posted: "What’s happening in Portland is too close to Germany 1930s for any American to ignore." This evokes the rise of Nazism (a form of fascism) in direct criticism of Trump's deployment of federal forces, tying it to authoritarian conservative actions.

Broader Context in Related PostsMoulton's posts often frame Trump and his supporters as threats akin to fascism without using the exact word every time, but the above instances confirm direct usage. For example:He has called Trump a "petty tyrant" (March 28, 2025), compared GOP actions to dictatorships (February 22, 2025), and labeled Trump-associated groups like the Proud Boys as a "domestic terror organization" (September 30, 2020), reinforcing a pattern of anti-fascist critique.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@GatorsFB And a statement you have made my friend!

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@GatorsFB This hits so much harder now. The noise was that Lagway was good.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@UFBarstool Getting past USF was always going to be a big ask. Schedule really settles out from here. Billy Taggart has got this.

[Shooter McGavin @WilliamBButtli2]

@FFB_Fanatics lol, this is marry your cousin levels of cope