One underrated benefit of AI-generated content (like NotebookLM podcasts): No woke padding.
I’m listening to an AI podcast generated from an author’s early work. While the author's modern content has unfortunately devolved into exhausting destructive wokism, the AI-generated podcast of their early writing is unbiased and equally engaging.
One underrated benefit of AI-generated content (like NotebookLM podcasts): No woke padding.
I’m listening to an AI podcast generated from an author’s early work. While the author's modern content has unfortunately devolved into exhausting destructive wokism, the AI-generated podcast of their early writing is unbiased and equally engaging.
Using Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) is already statistically far safer than human driving, with more than 10 billion miles of real-world data.
Yet misleading headlines and incomplete reporting create fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the minds of the general public—many of whom don’t know the full facts. This discourages adoption of a technology that could genuinely make roads safer for everyone.
My grandmother, who can barely walk, still insists on driving herself and is a significant hazard (to herself and others) on the road. Articles like this one make her—and people in similar situations—afraid to try FSD. In trying to manufacture outrage, these publications are actually harming the very people they claim to protect. The cost of this kind of irresponsible journalism is far greater than most realize.