@mcagney@daddaddaddadd@HelloNavra@Figure My concern is less about Figure’s current execution and more about market recognition. If the 485+ partners and Figure Connect prove this is financial infrastructure, then the key question is when the market starts valuing Figure on that basis rather than as a high-growth lender.
@daddaddaddadd@mcagney@HelloNavra@Figure Two risks for $FIGR:
1. If the market sees Figure as just a lending company, the stock could still get cut in half.
2. If Figure is truly building financial infrastructure, current growth is far too slow for that ambition.
@mcagney@HHorsley@Bitwise I’ve held FIGR since the IPO, but I’m starting to question my thesis. Is the market discounting FIGR because investors don’t believe its current high growth can be sustained?
@mcagney@HHorsley@Bitwise Mike, two questions:
1. FGRS trading volume remains extremely low. Does this suggest the blockchain-native stock model hasn’t gained traction?
2. Q3 loan volume is growing, but QoQ growth fell by more than half vs. Q2. Does this signal slowing momentum, or just a tougher base?