Wind Concerns

Wind Concerns is a movement of Alberta residents against the imposition of industrial wind turbines in rural residential areas.

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

Well, that was a weird weekend between the snow and Carney and Smith agreeing to vacuum carbon dioxide from the air.

https://t.co/gtrldeFiIB

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

How much longer can the Alberta Utilities Commission invoke the outdated and flawed Health Canada study, and ignore the mountain of growing evidence of the impacts of infrasound on Albertans?

https://t.co/1NZ5R0rf6e

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

Former climate activists are beginning to reject the narrative they once backed...

#ClimateScam

https://t.co/uxPLacRH2L

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

https://t.co/XfuweOGERZ

[Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger]

For over a quarter-century the world’s leading climate scientists and news media have warned that human-caused climate change has doubled the rate of sea level rise and is thus putting civilization in grave danger. “We will see at least four feet of sea level rise and possibly ten by the end of the century,” wrote The New York Times’ David Wallace-Wells in 2019. “The oceans we know won’t survive climate change,” claimed The Atlantic that same year. The author, Robinson Meyer, quoted estimates by Princeton University’s Michael Oppenheimer that sea levels would rise by more than 34 inches by 2100.

When I asked Oppenheimer about those numbers at the time, he told me, “The actual number, which is based on the sea level rise amount in [IPCC Representative Concentration Pathway] 8.5 for its [Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate] report, is 1.1 meters, which is 3 feet, 7 inches,” or 43 inches.

All of those claims have been proven false by the first-ever global study of sea level rise based on data gathered locally rather than on models extrapolating from assumptions. The Journal of Marine Science and Engineering published the peer-reviewed article, “A Global Perspective on Local Sea Level Changes,” by Hessel Voortman, a Dutch engineer, and Rob de Vos, a researcher, last week.

“The average rate of sea level rise in 2020 is (only) around 1.5 mm/year (15 cm per century),” said Voortman. “This is significantly lower than the 3 to 4 mm/year often reported by climate scientists in scientific literature and the media.”

Indeed, the significance of the study lies in the fact that most of what the media and climate scientists claimed about climate change and sea level rise was false. Scientists and the media tend to focus on the IPCC projections of the extreme uppper end of sea level rise despite reality tracking at the very low end.

Voortman conducted the research without financial support and does not deny the reality of climate change, sea level rise, or the need for models. “It is important to stress that there are good reasons to have models. If we as engineers design something in the coastal zone, then we try to achieve a technical lifetime of 50 to 100 years, and that means we need to try to look into the future.”

An expert on the impacts of climate change, Roger Pielke, Jr., said, “Most people are not aware that the scientific community uses different concepts to discuss sea level rise. What matters for communities is what happens where they are located, not an abstract global average.”

Headlines about sea level rise have been catastrophic for decades. Because of sea level rise, the earth would become “uninhabitable,” said The Times’ Wallace-Wells in 2019. “As oceans rise,” wrote Brad Plumer in The New York Times in 2020, “crashing waves and extreme high tides will be able to reach farther inland, putting tens of millions more people and trillions of dollars in assets worldwide at periodic risk of flooding.”

Plumer’s article assumed sea levels would rise 12-36 inches. Instead, it appears they could increase just six inches, the same as during the 20th Century.

Strikingly, nobody in over 25 years of research had done what Voortman and De Vos did. “It is crazy that it had not been done,” said Voortman. “I started doing this research in 2021 by doing the literature review. ‘Who has done the comparison of the projections with the observations?’ And there were none.”

Nobody paid Voortman to do his study, nor does he belong to a university. “I'm a hydraulic engineer by profession, almost 30 years now, and involved in flood protection, coastal infrastructure adaptation projects all over the world,” he explained. “From practice, I had already encountered the situation that sea level projections were exceeding sea level observations.” First he published a paper in 2023 on the discrepancy between projections and what was happening in the Netherlands. “Then, I decided to try to analyze as many locations over the world as possible.”

In other words, despite billions of dollars poured into climate science over the last 25 years from governmental and philanthropic sources, with major climate centers in universities around the world, no scientist had done what Voortman did, without money, off the side of his desk.

Why did the media and scientists get sea level rise so terribly wrong? And why didn’t anyone bother comparing real world data to the predictions of the models? Graduate students sometimes struggle to find gaps in the scientific literature to fill. Why didn’t any of them notice this one? Why did it take an engineer volunteering his time to determine whether sea level rise was accelerating?

Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

https://t.co/Hi3mQG3I3g

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

@ScottStrom @IngrahamAngle False logic. Because there are oil spills we should, therefore, ignore the devastating effects of wind turbines? How about we don't do either?

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

Canadian youth are struggling to find jobs and afford basic rent. This is wrong.

[Kat Kanada 🏴 @KatKanada_TM]

Did you know the gov't gives refugees $224.00/day for food and hotel?

That's $81,760 per year that we are paying per person that comes here.

And Carney is promising you a "prosperous" economy.

Elbows Up!

🫠🤡

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

@MNoonanishere @KatKanada_TM Yes, that is the question of the hour, isn't it?

[Danielle Smith @ABDanielleSmith]

I’m going to be more explicit than usual so there is no misunderstanding this policy:

1. Get graphic pornographic images out of school libraries.

2. Leave the classics on the shelves.

3. We all know the difference between the items in 1 and 2. Let’s not play any more games in implementing this policy for our kids.

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

Belgians reject Big Wind!

https://t.co/OvzK3lbF6v

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

Damning parliamentary report on negative health impacts of renewables like wind on mental health.

https://t.co/qE17v2JZkd

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

https://t.co/E0XPNAjiM4

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

https://t.co/P2fZx0kU7D

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

@ABDanielleSmith We should certainly take control of our energy future instead of placating destructive ideology!

https://t.co/P2fZx0kU7D

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

Why can't the Alberta government protect it's rural citizens too?

https://t.co/xbG77kNE3O

[Lyndsey, RN 💜🐭 @HouseLyndseyRN]

Can we play guess what I don’t have yet but will be forming next inside me due to the continuous spike production which today makes 1560 days of still producing spike protein with T cell exhaustion, and positive ebv reaction since my first injection 12/24/2020

You guessed right - right now with delay in proper medical care and research and no off switch to the spike factory- the sv40 cancer promoter/enhancer sequences that’s in the vax-> CANCER will happen next inside me- my insides are daily trying to kill me and the recipe for cancer is all there

In case you don’t know, my dad is also vaxinjured- we were actually diagnosed on the same day despite living in different states-

2 months after his Pfizer booster he was diagnosed with Stage 2 prostate cancer, when he had a clean check up just 5 months prior to being diagnosed- he has also had 2 strokes since as well despite being on long term anticoagulants for a prior triple bypass surgery of his heart 20 + years ago - and we know what’s caused that - which is the amyloid fibrin microclots I have as well

I will report that since his strokes he does not have any major limiting deficits & is very active doing Physical therapy 3 days a week & I am also happy to report his PSA level for which they measure to see his prostate levels was undetected and his results were < 0 on his last two lab checks

- my stepsister who is a radiologist at a breast imaging center is taking such good care of my dad and is connected with everything I do and is well aware of @MakisMD and some of the modalities that’s helping his patients

So if you guys don’t want to watch me in real time form cancer or a tumor from the SV40 in the vials I received then we have to get louder bc until then I’m a dead woman walking

No one should have ever been put in this situation and no one ever received informed consent or would have consented to the SV40 they sneakily put in when they did a bait and switch on us

They are evil and every single one of them are complicit in crimes against humanity and they will be prosecuted to the fullest extent including execution as GOD sees fit

Thank you @Kevin_McKernan for all you do for us- love you so much!

Wake up yall!

Please stop and Wake TF up!!

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

@FreyjaTarte Tariffs, no matter who implements them, are an excuse for their own people's lack of production, creativity, and output. Escalating a trade war has no end. The answer is subsidiarity: for countries to do, on their local level, what they should be doing already.

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

@LichTamara Thank you for your voice for freedom. I'll never forget.

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

@ABDanielleSmith @MarkJCarney Who is Mark Carney, and why Canadians should really, really care.

https://t.co/wTBrqevzzr

[Wind Concerns @wind_concerns]

Who is Mark Carney, and why Canadians should really, really care.

https://t.co/wTBrqevzzr