@City_Xtra@GuillermoRai_@David_Ornstein City and Spurs both agreed 60m for Savinho before Marmoush came in. Just because of sell on clause on Marmoush, City increased the price on Savinho and decreased the price in Marmoush. The deal won't matter for Spurs. Mutual deal
@FabrizioRomano City and Spurs both agreed 60m for Savinho before Marmoush came in. Just because of sell on clause on Marmoush, City increased the price on Savinho and decreased the price in Marmoush. The deal won't matter for Spurs. Mutual deal
@VidricIvanovit2@Rory_Talks_Ball Bro. city and spurs both agreed 60m for Savinho before Marmoush came in. Just because of sell on clause on Marmoush, city increased the price on Savinho and decreased the price in Marmoush, so they will pay less to Frankfurt. The deal won't matter for Spurs. Mutual deal
@StillSelfish@Rory_Talks_Ball Bro. city and spurs both agreed 60m for Savinho before Marmoush came in. Just because of sell on clause on Marmoush, city increased the price on Savinho and decreased the price in Marmoush, so they will pay less to Frankfurt. The deal won't matter for Spurs. Mutual deal
@David_Ornstein@TheAthleticFC Copying Tottenham's project, I won't blame them. But at the end of the day, still a small club. Look at Leicester, they even won the premier league