ALEX DRONES

21st century skew-symmetric man

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

"τετέλεσται." https://t.co/AzpiPFJyzU

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@_djpn I've been waiting for the "I lived, bitch" (get well soon man)

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@GarrettPetersen @_its_not_real_ you may not even need room-temperature superconducting if photonics ends up being good enough, come to think of it

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@GarrettPetersen @_its_not_real_ (Kantbot was wrong - it's not that Trump will Raise Thule, it's that he's going to Make Halo Real)

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@Raelthy I feel like this specific sartorial sensibility surfaced in 2010-2014 and then was snuffed out way before its time

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@GovAmyKlobuchar my sense is that this is survivable, but it's going to require a kind of actual, principled commitment to reforming gender roles/norms

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@mauddweeb @xwanyex that guy has to be doing a @timgill924 level bit. he has to.

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@simonsarris

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@orthonormalist if anything I'd rather a less restrictive regulatory environment but the Dirae will not be denied their due

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@orthonormalist https://t.co/FgRt7Eq9Ly

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@LokiJulianus I'm not supportive of invoking ITAR generically for any given model above some threshold, but this is great if only for hamartetic reasons / the laughs

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@charlesthefool @atlanticesque I don't know why it is that you think this contradicts what I'm saying. yes, Ant favors more regulation, OAI less

the feds aren't doing this because they come down on one side or the other on that. they're doing it because Ant signaled they would obstruct functions of the State.

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@charlesthefool @atlanticesque it happened to them *because* they signaled they would kneecap themselves *intentionally* as a means of veto over the State. that's the whole point. OpenAI has signaled exactly the opposite.

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@charlesthefool @atlanticesque I'm not describing Dario plans to be made God King. I'm saying they claim to be building a technology that will define the balance of power for the next century, then expecting they can determine the lawful use of that technology over and above legitimate officers of the State.

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@charlesthefool @atlanticesque the treatment they are receiving is not so much about their existing level of capabilities, but rather their stated and revealed intent to usurp the functions of the State

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@LokiJulianus I'm not supportive of invoking ITAR generically for any given model above some threshold, but this is great if only for hamartetic reasons / the laughs

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@Raelthy

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@turrible_tao he's back, baby!!

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@lovabler0gue @thomaschattwill "if not my rules - your rules, applied fairly"

[ALEX DRONES @windigo_child]

@atlanticesque my only rejoinder here is much the same line of reasoning applies in favor of some capacity for retreating to encourage the health of the state