@therealkokopup@FloraLuzz_ If you think the former FBI director asking for the death of the current US president in a public forum is OK, then maybe the FBI needs to have a look at you folks too. You can't put that under the blanket of free speech; that's just idiotic! π€·π½π―
@margueritte_T@AntiLeftMemes Well, tell those retards 77 million people voted for stricter border and immigration enforcement and that it was a key topic of debate in the last election. If they didn't want it, then why did they vote for it???
@therealkokopup@FloraLuzz_ That does not cover if he makes threats to a US president; the Secret Service would want a word with him, so yes, that is a crime; he deserves jail time, and you and the three people who liked your comment are wrong.
Someone asked me if this is fake. Nope!! The βammoβ he put in the wood gun is. 22 caliber drive pin nail thatβs used to drive through hard masonry and steel on construction sites.
@MikeWel89735345@Luna_Jones79 It does from the actual voters, and that's the point: the people want it; the politicians on both sides are the ones denying them what they want. It's been this way a long time; this is not new, and they have continued to do so over the years.
It's absolutely a political issue because it's embedded with long-time old geezers on the right and communists/socialists on the left blocking the will of the majority of the people who voted for them; what the right is voting out is its own snakes blocking the bill, and the left needs to do the same. Neither party can give voters what they want: voter ID. This is why Dems have shitty polling numbers at the same time as the president has shitty numbers because they all vote against the will of the people. Shitty 16-20% approvals because people want voter IDs and they don't like Dem socialism BS, and that is the #1 reason enough right there. The stupidity of my former party is off the charts now, and the only thing you clowns do is make excuses, and you will get your asses handed to you again in the midterms.
You all, huh? I never said she wasn't a woman; I only said a way one could find out without the person removing their pants. I'm a moderate former Democrat; I don't gay-bash or believe in doing that. I think it creates more division. But I don't agree with their politics, like democratic socialism. They are conservative. I am only a right-leaning independent former Democrat voter; we are not the same in that regard, nor do I endorse this type of behavior. You should stop making assumptions; this is why people hate far-left people!
Sure, If they had DNA analysis, it would determine a person's genetic sex by looking at the sex chromosomes [1, 2]. Individuals with two X chromosomes are typically female, while those with one X and one Y chromosome are typically male. If Michele is XY, the person either had a penis at one time or currently has a penis because that's how DNA science works. No need to pull down pants. π€·π½π€£