M-C Scherman

Swede living in UK since way before EU. 1st generation immigrant. Thankful to have been educated and live in this amazing, tolerant and welcoming country.🎗️

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

Please sign this petition to end the addition of the synthetic drug folic acid to our flour.

It's being added with the claim it might prevent ~200 neural tube defects.

The trial that claim is based on resulted in 9 dead babies per 'saved' child.

https://t.co/XzpiIGIzT7

[BanksyCat @Banksycat]

Your pension is being used to fund the AI that’s taking your job.

Working people’s pensions. Foreign workers’ visas. Billionaires profits.

Labour found a way. Just not yours.

Ministers now have the power to direct YOUR retirement savings into tech companies. Without your consent.
Without trustees being able to stop them. MPs voted for it in April 2026. Your pension. Their investment. Your risk.

Starmer stood at a conference today and called that unlocking investment.

8 million UK jobs at risk from AI. UK hit harder by AI job losses than any other major economy. Entry level jobs cut first.

Global Talent Taskforce fast tracks foreign workers into the tech jobs being created. While British workers lose theirs to AI.

59% of UK tech wealth in London. Not Warrington. Not Rochdale. Not Bradford.

45 new AI billionaires this year alone. Global billionaire wealth up £4 trillion in one year.

Parliament bypassed to control the internet. No scrutiny. No debate. No vote.

1,200 children safeguarded from grooming gangs every single month. Child abuse conviction data buried for years.

That’s not investment. That’s a government using your retirement savings to fund the machine that’s replacing you.

He called it the Labour way. The workers paying for it might call it something else.

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer threatens mandatory ID checks to use mobile phones

"Protecting children online is vital, but these are outrageous plans that will fail to address the underlying causes of online harm. This will only result in population-wide ID checks for all of us to use our phones, tablets and laptops.

"Put simply, the Labour Government is threatening ID checks for the internet. No one in a democracy should need to show their passport just to get online.

"These plans would replace efforts for meaningful tech and parental responsibility with performative, authoritarian government control that children can easily circumvent by accessing adult-registered devices. However, for the UK's 50 million adults using the internet, this backdoor digital ID requirement would invoke the death of anonymity and internet privacy.

"The Government's plan very likely means that unless you submit to intrusive identity checks when setting up your phone or computer, there will be a chokehold on your software and internet access leaving you with a child-locked device. Planned restrictions on messaging, streaming and browsing raise the potential of spyware in our pockets that will be exploited for other purposes before long.

"The Government mandating that all phones in Britain require ID and surveillance software is a crossing of the Rubicon that would make the UK one of the most authoritarian internet regimes in the world. This extreme technological censorship requires rigorous public and parliamentary scrutiny that is currently totally missing" - Silkie Carlo | @silkiecarlo

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨WARNING the bit Starmer isnt telling you is... this sort of device technology is called Client-Side Scanning.

It is already built into the Ofcom regulated Online Safety Act through “accredited technology” notices. The EU has been pushing similar rules through its Child Sexual Abuse Regulation, known as “Chat Control”.

It basically means phone companies and platforms can be pushed to scan messages, images and content BEFORE you send them, then either allowing them to be sent or blocking/reporting them.

Once the precedent is set, "to protect children", it can easily be widened to block whatever government decides is “harmful”.

And that's how you go from child safety to state approved speech.

TA DAAAA 🚨

[Scott Lewis @WarriorSpeech28]

This is why they're so obsessed with Digital ID, today it's eat 25% less meat, consume 20% less dairy, drive an electric car and replace your boiler, all presented as recommendations but recommendations are difficult to enforce.

Systems are not, Digital ID is the foundation, once everybody has a digital identity connected to government services, payments, banking and daily life, monitoring becomes easy.

How much fuel you use, how much energy you consume, how often you travel, what you buy, what your carbon footprint looks like.

Then eventually you arrive at the logical destination, enforcement of the system, allowances, carbon credits to enforce you to stay within the limits, one steak a month, a hot shower fortnightly and your car only drives 15 minutes from where you live.

A system where your consumption is measured against targets set by people you've never met.

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

Why can't public health understand risk?

Their optimistic claim is that mandating folic acid in our flour might prevent 200 cases of neural tube defects in pregnancy a year.

But with 70M people in UK that is a chance of benefit of 1 in 350,000.

BUT

69.5 million of us have NO POSSIBILITY OF BENEFIT.

For those people it is ALL risk.

[Ben Pile @clim8resistance]

The Climate Change Committee's longstanding desire to stamp out meat and dairy consumption is back in the news following their publication of the 7th Carbon Budget -- advice to Parliament and Ed Miliband, which they are very likely (they always do) to adopt without meaningful debate.

They have been trying to do this for a long time. And they have for just as long been trying to find ways to make this acceptable. In 2020, this including convening the Climate Assembly on the belief that the Assembly could stand as a focus group or opinion poll to represent the entire public. They further believed that if they could show that the Assembly supported something, then because the Assembly was selected from ordinary people, the public would accept the Assembly's votes on policy options.

But the Assembly's vote on the reduction of meat and dairy consumption was not a vote as we'd understand it. First, only a third of the assembly were present for the vote. Second, the assembly members were not given the option to vote against anything. The 'voting' consisted of a "Borda count" -- a method in which the "voter" ranks options given to them. The policy of reducing meat and dairy consumption only appeared on less than one third (10/35) of that part of the Assembly's orders of preferences, according to the Borda method.

8 policies were put to the Assembly, and reducing meat and dairy was the second lowest preference:

1. Provide support to farmers: 89%
2. Information and education: 86%
3. Use land efficiently: 66%
4. Rules for large retailers/supermarkets: 46%
5. More local and seasonal food: 40%
6. Make low carbon food affordable: 34%
7. Some, just less, meat [reducing meat and dairy consumption]: 29%
8. Part of planning policy and new developments, including allotments: 14%.

Worse for the CCC, though not counted, comments submitted to the organisers were adamant that policies should not coerce, force, or punish -- i.e. tax -- consumer behaviour.

The convenors of the climate assembly, which includes Parliament itself (the offices, not the members), green NGOs and their billionaire philanthropist grantors, civil servants, and fake academics lied about this underwhelming result, and claimed that the Assembly -- and therefore the public -- supported the CCC's ambitions to force us to be vegetarians.

This means two things.

1. The government, MPs, green wonks, civil servants, the blob, all of them, *know* that these policies are unwanted and unpopular -- that they have no mandate.

2. That they will try everything and anything to get the policies they want, all the same, and that includes acts of very obvious bad faith.

Ed Miliband and his crew and the current population of the CCC are even more determined to inflict policies on us before democracy can stop them.

This is bad for us, and it is bad for UK farmers.

Here is a video I made about it in 2020.

[Rafe Heydel-Mankoo @RafHM]

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images

Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people

The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote".

In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks.

That was the only way that "nature" could win.

However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo.

The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House.

The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear

This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural.

Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain"

Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar.

The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists.

Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths.

Me on @GBNews:

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

If you think 18,000 supermarket job losses is bad, you aren’t paying attention

Since Labour came to power in 2024
▪️400,000 payroll jobs have gone
▪️155,000 fewer jobs vacant
▪️163,000 jobs to be lost in 2026
▪️1.7 MILLION now unemployed
▪️8.3 MILLION on UC

And rising 🔥

[Chris Wick @ChrisWickNews]

They told you the planet is dying… and you’re the problem.

Your food.
Your habits.
Your existence.

Meanwhile, behind closed doors, something else is growing.

AI data centres in the UK alone could pump out 123 million tonnes of carbon emissions — the equivalent of millions of human lives over a decade.

But where’s the outrage?

Instead, they blame cows… tax farmers… and squeeze the people who actually feed you.

While tech giants expand quietly… signing deals… building systems that never sleep… and never get questioned.

Different rules.
Different targets.
Same script.

So let me ask you…

Why are everyday people being punished…
while the biggest emitters keep getting rewarded?
Is this really about saving the planet…
or controlling who pays the price?
Drop your thoughts below — I want to hear what you think.

And if this made you stop and think for even a second… share it.

More people need to see this.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

“Twenty-five years ago, the political class was more willing to engage in open debate.”

Today, there is an attempt to cast legitimate criticism of prevailing orthodoxies — whether on diversity, Islam, immigration, or climate change — as misinformation, disinformation, or hate speech.

At the heart of the free speech crisis is an unwillingness on the part of the promoters of these policies to defend them in public.

Instead of engaging in good-faith debate, they portray critics as beyond the pale.

In this relatively recent phenomenon, people are increasingly realising that if they challenge a certain cluster of prevailing orthodoxies, they are likely to be cancelled.

We must push back against this.

Watch the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young, speaking at our event in Belfast 👇

[M-C Scherman @windship211]

Powerful

[Critica Climatica Alias Fortunato Nardelli @climacritic]

Questa foto si intitola "La scomparsa della donna".
E' opera della fotografa yemenita Boushra Almutawakel.

[Best in Dogs @BestinDogs]

"It turns out that pets also have last wills before they die, but only known to vets who put old and sick animals to sleep." Twitter user Jesse Dietrich asked a vet what the hardest part of his job was. The specialist replied without hesitation that the hardest thing for him was seeing how old or sick animals look for their owners before they fall asleep. The fact is 90% of owners don't want to be in a room with a dying animal. People leave so they don't see their animals leave. But they don't realize it's in these last moments of life that their animal needs them the most. Vets are asking owners to stay close to animals until the end. "It is inevitable that they die before you. Remember that you were the center of their lives. Maybe they were just a part of you. But they are also your family. Even if it's hard, don't give up on them. Don't let them die in a room with a stranger in a place they don't like. It's very painful for vets to see how pets can't find their owner in the last minutes of their lives. They don't understand why their master left them. After all, they needed the consolation of their master. Veterinarians do their best to make animals not so scared, but they are totally strangers to them. Don't be a coward because it's too painful for you. Think about the animal. Endure that pain for them. Be with them until the end.💞🙏

[Net Zero Watch @NetZeroWatch]

"I certainly won’t be giving up meat for net zero – and neither should you. Why? For starters, net zero zealots endlessly claim that the farming of meat plays a huge role in causing climate change because cows and other farm animals release so much methane. Yet, a 2021 study found that vegan men fart seven times more than men who eat meat," says Michael Deacon, "there’s only one thing for it – to save the planet, net zero zealots should give up veganism and eat lots of delicious, homegrown British meat instead."

#CostOfNetZero

[Race @multiplanet1]

Elon Musk flew to Russia to buy a rocket and the Russians laughed in his face and spat on his shoes.

In 2001 Musk had a simple plan. Buy a refurbished intercontinental ballistic missile from Russia, strip out the warhead, and use it to send a small greenhouse to Mars. He thought it would cost about $20 million.

He flew to Moscow with Adeo Ressi and Mike Griffin. They sat in a meeting with Russian rocket engineers and military officials. Musk explained what he wanted. The Russians looked at each other and started laughing. One of them literally spat on the ground near his feet. They thought he was a joke. A tech millionaire playing astronaut.

They eventually offered to sell him one rocket for $8 million. Musk tried to negotiate. They raised the price to $10 million per rocket out of disrespect. They wanted to humiliate him into leaving.

On the flight home from Moscow, while his friends slept, Musk opened his laptop and started building a spreadsheet. He calculated the raw material cost of building a rocket from scratch. Aluminum. Carbon fiber. Fuel. Electronics. He realized the materials cost roughly three percent of what aerospace companies charged.

He closed the laptop and said to Adeo "I think we can build this ourselves."

SpaceX was born on that flight. Not in a garage. Not in a lab. On a plane ride home from being humiliated by Russians who thought he was a fool.

Most people experience rejection and go home. Musk experienced rejection and opened a spreadsheet. The entire commercial space industry exists because some Russian engineers decided to be disrespectful to a 30 year old with a laptop.

[Stand Up To Marxism @Sup2Communism]

The reason the UK government & police chiefs refuse to admit "two-tier policing" exists is simple.

They don't see it as injustice, they see it as morally righteous equity. Trained in Critical Race Theory anti-racism packages, they believe colour-blind equality actually creates oppression.

Official College of Policing guidance explicitly rejects treating everyone the same; different rules for different racialised groups to "fix disparities."

In the Left’s cultural Communist, oppressor-vs-oppressed worldview, which is the modern evolution of Marxist class struggle into identity politics, leniency and favourable treatment for certain “oppressed” groups, and brutal crackdowns against the white “oppressor” isn’t bias... In their mind, It’s restorative justice.

They genuinely believe this is progress. Admitting two-tier reality would collapse the entire ideology, their training programs, and moral self-image. Just like communist regimes denied famines and purges to protect the narrative. The public sees bodycam videos, protest contrasts, grooming gang delays, and cases like Henry Nowak.

Elites judge by equity. This is applied authoritarian egalitarian identitarianism. Denial protects ideology. #TwoTierPolicing #EquityVsEquality

[Toby Young @toadmeister]

With the demise of the IPCC's extreme RCP8.5 climate scenario, any remaining reason to pursue Net Zero has vanished – and even Tony Blair has started to notice, says meteorologist Andrew Sibley. https://t.co/xh1CXKYT7z

[Ben Aveling- Radmore Farm @Radmore_farm]

Lab Grown Meat On Supermarket Shelves?

The FSA is fast-tracking approval for lab-grown meat in UK supermarkets — aiming for early 2027. But their own documents reveal consumer acceptance hasn’t increased, there’s no labelling framework, and the nutritional profile is “as yet unclear.” As a primary producer, I’ve read the receipts. Here’s what they’re not telling you.

Want real meat?
Shop now :
https://t.co/OeCNt28O8n

[Department of State @StateDept]

Ideological conditioning and two-tiered policing are glaring symptoms of civilizational decline. They must be rejected across the West.

The United States sends our condolences to the family of Henry Nowak and the people of the United Kingdom at this troubling time.