@amin_jacoub @elonmusk Logic is a sub-field of philosophy, and is primarily contentless, not to be conflated with sub-fields like morality. Did you know there are strange logics (such as paraconsistent dialtheism) that extend classical logic? Best to learn those before citing ‘logic’ as moral arg.
@amin_jacoub @elonmusk And to presume that Kant is the only authority on morality is also a flawed idea. Are you familiar with any of the other moral philosophy schools and the debates between them?
@amin_jacoub @elonmusk I have read Kant actually. The categorical imperative does not say it is ‘not moral’ to make useful goods. That is an incorrect reading. The categorical imperative argues that only actions you are prepared to make into law are morally good. Making useful goods meets that test.