Este vídeo es increíblemente hipnótico y me ha ayudado a entender porqué me duele siempre la espalda en ese punto.
He hecho el movimiento que hace ella y alivio instantáneo, qué locura.
Last nights Channel 4 Dispataches programme attempted to bring down @TRobinsonNewEra based on his financial dealings. He made an outstanding counter documentary which rebutted each point made by Channel 4.
However, two very important things which you may have missed or maybe just aren’t aware of regarding Tommy’s own programme and Channel 4 themselves.
An 11 yr old scandal involving a corrupt Pakistani ex British army officer and wannabe Tory candidate, his fixer/hired thug an allegedly the 1st cousin of now Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood. Wouldn’t you have thought that might be worth exploring…but total silence from the MSM today.
And guess who owns or is the ultimate controller of Channel 4 itself….its not privately owned at all….its publicly owned…by the government, the departure of Culture, Media and Sport to be precise. So obviously no possible conflict of interest could be involved at all. Always ask questions!! @ScoopUrban
Jennifer Welch and Joe Welch on the 9/11 racism and hysteria propagated by MAGA republicans :
"So, of course, in the city of New York, we have a Muslim mayor who actually advocates for everybody. He has a brand of politics that leaves not one group behind, period, full stop. And more than anything, he advocates for working class New Yorkers, which there are more of by a lot, than the billionaires.
And because he is Muslim, you have a bunch of people that have been completely propagandized, that they believe that everybody that's a Muslim is a jihadist terrorist. And so the racism that is accelerating before the commemoration of 9-11 is out of control."
Bob Shillman was one of TPUSA’s major Jewish donors—and in his own words, he withdrew his financial support because Turning Point had changed and Charlie Kirk had changed.
So answer the question:
WHAT CHANGED?
Because we’re now repeatedly being told that Charlie’s views hadn’t changed and TPUSA hadn’t changed.
But look at what was happening during the final months of Charlie’s life:
Charlie brought Tucker Carlson onto his stage. He considered bringing Candace Owens back. He watched Dave Smith dismantle Josh Hammer’s arguments on Israel. He sat down with TPUSA chapter leaders in the summer of 2025 for a serious discussion about Israel.
And major donors were withdrawing their support.
Then came the confrontation Charlie described in his now-famous text:
“I just lost another $2 million donor. Jewish donors are playing into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.”
According to accounts that have since emerged, an emergency Zoom meeting followed involving people connected to TPUSA, pro-Israel advocacy and others in Charlie’s orbit. The circumstances, participants and purpose of that meeting deserve scrutiny rather than assumptions.
Then Charlie reportedly sent another chilling message:
“I think they’re going to kill me.”
The next day, Charlie Kirk was assassinated at UVU.
None of this, by itself, proves who killed Charlie or why. But it raises an obvious historical question that cannot simply be waved away: What was happening inside Charlie’s political world during the final months of his life?
Charlie was increasingly unwilling to give Israel unconditional support. He publicly wrestled with Gaza, innocent civilian deaths, the possibility of an Iran war, America First foreign policy and whether supporting Israel automatically meant supporting every action of the Israeli government.
So my question for Erika Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy and everyone speaking for TPUSA is simple:
If Charlie hadn’t changed, why did Bob Shillman say he had?
Why were donors withdrawing millions?
Why did Charlie himself say he was being bullied and was prepared to leave the pro-Israel cause?
You cannot simultaneously tell us “nothing changed” while asking us to ignore the people who withdrew their money precisely because they believed something had changed.
Play the clip.
Listen to Bob Shillman’s own words.
@RealCandaceO@BlakeSNeff@MrsErikaKirk@AndrewKolvet
Then decide for yourself.
Next week, Trump's DOJ is back in court seeking to revive the dismissed indictments of James Comey & Letitia James.
When Comey was first indicted, Scott Jennings defended it on CNN. I debunked his deflections live.
The truth: Trump's abuses of power are the worst in US history.
We asked a congressional candidate about the Epstein files at the Republican Midterm Convention. Nine minutes later, security showed up. My press credential was revoked and we were escorted out.
Go to https://t.co/kOrq9tLjXu to see for yourself.
That’s it. The Charl Kirk assassination, case closed.
Just to be clear in case anyone missed exactly what is implied in this clip (not by Candace Owens, btw, just by the facts that we know and what Jack is actually saying in the clip).
Here goes:
For weeks (and months actually) Charlie Kirk is having disputes with his Zionist donor, and presumably members of his inner circle, because he is through with the Zionist cause.
The discussions are heating up as weeks roll on, until the night before the UVU event he is on a zoom call being put through what is tantamount to a struggle session.
During this intervention/struggle session Charlie is texting friends saying “I think they are going to kill me”.
The pointed implication is that presumably during that same zoom, someone also on the call is thinking to themselves, “you know what I really need to text that mountain man, and see if we can get him down to the UVU event tomorrow.”
That mountain man, Butch Hibbs, (he’s totally not CIA/Mossad, he just really likes the mountains) then immediately calls his brother Jack Hibbs and asks if he can get Butch a inner circle pass for the event the next day.
WTF?
There’s so so so much about this case that is just so fucking absurd, that it was clearly not Tyler Robinson, in the Library with a Candlestick.
Okay. Fair enough. It’s not a game of Cluedo, but come on.
This case, and anyone still serving up the fed slop is obviously a Conspiracy.
On the behalf of everyone who has mourned a man they never met… thank you Candace for a proper memorial eulogizing Charlie.
In her own words, she read from her journals and allowed us into her memories and thoughts, continuing to show us who Charlie really was.
What I’ve come to realize is we still haven’t gotten that vulnerability and authenticity from anyone else. We needed it but she is the only one who provided it as painful as it was.
Like from a year ago, she gave a beautiful tribute to the man whom all of us grew to love and admire.
They came up together.
They didn’t say “the rest is history.”
They said “the rest is future.”
She called him her best friend and her brother. She said there is no Candace without Charlie.
Does any of that sound like someone who hated him?
Where do we go from here?
I think that’s for us to decide.
Charlie himself taught us to keep asking questions. He taught us that this movement isn’t about left versus right. Conservative vs liberal. That this movement is about all of us against them. Most of all Charlie taught us to not back down from our faith in Christ. That it is the most important thing in life.
I pray we remember that and continue to pray for our enemies and pray those who persecute us.
Thanks again Candace. We stand with you. We grieve with you. And we will continue to go max along side you. May God continue to bless you and your family ✝️🙏🏼❤️
@RealCandaceO@candaceoshow