⭐️

[BIG MAINE 🦅💍💍🗽💍 @maineadelphia]

yes brother that woman with a lingerie photoshoot is going to be a great gf to you

[Finance Guy @GuyTalksFinance]

Berkshire Hathaway would not buy a home building company if home prices were going lower

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans.

Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable.

Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale.

Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné.

Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut.

À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol.

Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée.

Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit.

Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie.

Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags.

Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle.

Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère.

Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision :

"La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne)
"La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek
"Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt
Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.

[⭐️ @winstar_]

RIP Willie Colon. Gracias por tu música. Vivirás.

[Jay Alto @theJayAlto]

you pity the moth confusing a lamp for the moon, yet here you are confusing a screen for the world

[obese.potato🥔 @Obesepotato_]

Current unrealized losses:

-Tom Lee: -$7.4B
-Michael Saylor: -$3.6B
-Me: -$900

Combined we're down $11 billion

At least I'm contributing

[Ben Leo @Benleo]

NEW: I went to Billie Eilish’s $3m LA pad to see if she practices what she preaches.

STOLEN LAND? EVERYONE’S WELCOME?

Not at Billie’s high-security home. Huge walls, security fencing, cameras and MASSIVE front gate.

Rules for thee but not for me 🤔

[Aesthetic.Guyy @Aestheticswallz]

“Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life?” — Matthew 6:27

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

America is rejecting Democrat lawlessness

This post got 103,000 Likes in 12 hours

“Somebody else got shot by ICE, and I don't give a damn. Good. Cause I don't know why you're bringing a gun to agitate federal officers doing their job. What's your problem? Stay home. Ya’ll gotta find something else to love cause Somalians ain't it. It's getting you killed. Stupid ass”

[Lomez @L0m3z]

One asymmetry among many is the fiction that the active resistance of a few hundred protesters are an expression of democratic will equal in legitimacy to the democratic will of the 77 million people who voted explicitly for enforcement of federal immigration law

[wanye @xwanyex]

It’s important to remember that nothing is actually happening right now. It’s not a big deal. A bunch of people are mad about immigration enforcement and they are putting themselves in harms way, causing conflict, and getting themselves hurt. That’s regrettable. But life is fine, the country is fine. There’s absolutely no reason that this couldn’t go on like this forever, if the protesters refuse to relent. That would be fine. Your life would be fine. My life would be fine.

Protesters who interfere with legitimate law-enforcement operations are going to keep getting themselves hurt, but that’s an acceptable outcome we can live with.

[Carmine Sabia @CarmineSabia]

ICE is in cities nationwide, and shootings are not happening.

Even in Memphis, with a Democrat mayor, they are getting cooperation, and none of this is happening.

But Tim Walz and Jacob Frey want chaos, so you do not learn about their theft of taxpayers' money.

[Lewis 🇺🇸 @ctjlewis]

The second ICE shoots a guy from 10 yards away for simply waving a sign, I will be right there with you. But I don’t think either of these two incidents remotely resemble that.

[Liam @LiamEvergreen]

Watching liberal logic crumble in real time 🤔🤯

[MAZE @mazemoore]

2013. Obama is asked why his administration is deporting so many people and separating families.

Obama: I'm the President, not the Emperor. I have to enforce the law even if it is tragic and heartbreaking.

[LHGrey™️ @Grey_0G]

If we actually taught raw, unfiltered history in schools...the blood-soaked, soul-crushing truth instead of this sanitized, revisionist horseshit...the Left would lose half its recruiting pool overnight.

Teach kids what the Bolsheviks actually did: a fanatical minority of intellectuals and agitators, drunk on Marxist poison, overthrew a crumbling regime in 1917 promising “peace, land, and bread.”

What they delivered was the Red Terror...Cheka death squads executing 100,000–250,000 without trial, shooting priests in the street, drowning officers tied to planks, starving entire villages into submission.

Teach the psychology: how Lenin’s “vanguard” justified any atrocity as “historically necessary,” how useful idiots in the West swooned over the “workers’ paradise” while millions were worked to death in the first Gulag camps.

Then show how that same Bolshevik machine birthed Stalin’s Holodomor...engineered famine in Ukraine that starved 4–6 million while grain was exported.

Mao’s Great Leap Forward that killed 30–45 million in the name of “equality.”

Pol Pot’s killing fields where wearing glasses got you executed.

Every single time.

Teach the visceral pattern: utopian promises always slide into mass graves because power concentrates, resentment is weaponized, and humanity breaks under ideology.

Teach that the road to hell is paved with moral grandstanding and envy dressed as justice.

But no.

Instead we get 1619 Project fanfiction, endless white guilt seminars, and lessons that paint America as uniquely evil while glossing over the fact that every civilization had slavery, conquest, and brutality...ours just happened to end it while others still practice it today.

We don’t teach the why of human nature: tribalism, the will to power, how demagogues exploit the eternal human weakness for free shit and revenge fantasies.

So when some blue-haired activist screams “eat the rich” or “defund the police” or “from the river to the sea,” millions of historically illiterate kids nod along because they’ve never seen what those slogans actually produce when tried in the real world.

They’ve never smelled the mass graves.

If we taught real history...ferocious, ugly, precise../they’d recognize the Bolshevik playbook being dusted off and run again right in front of them.

Instead, we raise generations of useful idiots who think they’re on the right side of history while marching straight into the same fucking slaughterhouse their grandparents escaped.

The Left needs historical amnesia to survive.

That’s why they fight so hard to control the curriculum.

Wake the fuck up.

Teach the truth, blood, horrors and all, or watch the cycle repeat with fresh corpses.

Fuck this revisionist, sanitized, soft bullshit. We are raising a nation of fucking pussies and useful idiots.

💀🔪

[𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑺𝒂𝒍𝒕 𝑶𝒇 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑬𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒉 @Shadaya_Knight]

A man makes money and he thinks he needs to start a family

A woman makes money and she thinks she doesn't need anyone

But men are the selfish ones

[Gene Grey @EuginhoCortez]

The US is weird

Once Dems lose an election, the next thing they do is to create a violent unrest and hope to keep it going until the next election

Then they basically say there'll only be quiet if they are voted in

How does that work for a democracy?

[Steve 🇺🇸 @SteveLovesAmmo]

2017: Riots
2018: Riots
2019: Riots
2020: Riots
2021: No Riots
2022: No Riots
2023: No Riots
2024: No Riots
2025: Riots
2026: Riots

Make sense yet?

I’m just here pointing out the obvious.

[Slick @NickStillHere]

This tweet racist as hell but I'm cryin lmfaooooo