Gary

[Gary @witham_g]

@MMUPreRegNurse1 @TutorNC1 @witham_g

[Gary @witham_g]

@Olie_Mac @MMUPreRegNurse1 yes, how could the researchers ethically justify not interveneing if it relates to patient safety? #MMUFLASHMOB

[Gary @witham_g]

@laura_c86 @MMUPreRegNurse1 what about the ethics of watching medication errors and not acting? #mmuflashmob

[Gary @witham_g]

#XFactor
Raign was bad and annoying

[Gary @witham_g]

#XFactor wow that's awesome
From zak

[Gary @witham_g]

#XFactorwozzer

[Gary @witham_g]

#XFactor Monica's great she's so emotional it's awesome

[Gary @witham_g]

#XFactor Monica's a chav

[Gary @witham_g]

#XFactorcheryll is bum

[Gary @witham_g]

@MelB1308 #INSU3 yes, sample charactertics very narrow, very difficult to meaningfully generalise findings

[Gary @witham_g]

@MelB1308 #INSU3 yes good point about central tendency

[Gary @witham_g]

@MelB1308 #INSU, yes I think the questionnaire was developed well, with good internal validity

[Gary @witham_g]

@buckley_emma #INSU3 yes to validate it further it may need to be extended to a wider sample of men in relation to type of treatment/age etc

[Gary @witham_g]

@buckley_emma #INSU3 yes, ultimately I think it fails the 'so what question' and adds little new to the research area

[Gary @witham_g]

@buckley_emma #INSU3 yes, the results are highly dependent on when the data were collected in relation to when they had treatment

[Gary @witham_g]

@buckley_emma #INSU3 yes, the sample is very limited and does not reflect the opening discussion

[Gary @witham_g]

@buckley_emma #INSU3 yes, exactly, a major issue for this research

[Gary @witham_g]

@buckley_emma #INSU3 yes, the authors show good external & internal validity

[Gary @witham_g]

@buckley_emma #INSU3 literature review important in creating questionnaire but look at sample characteristics and time point of intervention

[Gary @witham_g]

Thanks for that #INSU3