@lporiginalg >the effective intelligence of older men like ... Streicher was 15-20 points lower than the IQ's indicated here
>Julius Streicher 106
His poor students. Also he seems to have become more of a journalist than a teacher later in life.
@JamesSurowiecki There are plenty of plausible arguments, and many of them were made (including by women themselves) in the early years of the Women's Suffrage movement.
And a new, even more compelling argument has developed, which is our present society and what women actually vote for.
@Texamigo@avidseries If that photo were real I could see a different, less superstitious explanation for why they built it that way. But alas, we live in an era.
@ItsThomAnt@AdamMGrant Exactly the opposite of this. Many otherwise intelligent and genuinely competent women confuse competence with social defiance, and thus *act defiant* even when it's wholly inappropriate. And ideas like those in the replies to your tweet just make it worse.
Who said anything about a "world" war? Are you clinically retarded?
Yes, 1948. When the four Arab nations surrounding Israel all invaded at the behest of the Arabs living in Palestine, and got their asses roundly handed back to them. What the "Palestinians" like to call the "Nakba", leaving out the part where they voluntarily fled in advance of the war they asked for to stay away from the fighting, and then couldn't go back because they'd lost.
@themack619@_ZachFoster@davidfrum If you start a war and then lose, you don't get to cry about being "expelled," especially when what you'd have done if you had won is 100x worse than expulsion. Most of those 700k were first or second generation arrivals too.
It's not just that they haven't been exposed to it, it's that they've been actively lied to about why we believe what we believe. The whole idea of critical x theory bullshit is making up evil motivations to ascribe to the enemy, reframing male leadership and sacrifice as oppressive "patriarchy", etc.
@Blizzox2@ApoStructura Incorrect, we already had ways to quantity it, in so far as it existed to be quanitified. That is literally what the market does.
@brew56200@ShikikanG11@NEETzscheIDDQD "everyone" is an enormous ask. Effectively everyone in developed countries already has "the bare minimum to survive", thanks to Capitalism. Extending this to less-developed countries requires developing them, not just throwing resources in their face.
Being able to see, along with many others both within and without the system, that the system is broken, does not require having a solution ready to hand. I would love to have one, but I don't.
Harsher punishments for p-hacking and other forms of academic dishonesty would be a start though. And alternative ways to publish like ArXiv help too. (ArXiv notably doesn't accept submissions from the "soft sciences", though.)
You are under the mistaken belief that there is a better option for a secular society. We have yet to find one. I suspect one does not exist.
There is the sword, and there is the purse.
Either one man holds the sword, and many hands hold the purse, or one man holds both. I prefer the former, which is capitalism.