@dailyfreddo The high-velocity shockwave passes through tissue, causing sudden, violent compression and expansion that shears blood vessels and muscles. If met with a foreign object (necklace), this could have caused the neck to burst at point of impact.
@dailyfreddo Possibly that the necklace could have snapped and the cross specifically could have swung around at such high velocity causing the puncture like wound in the left side carotid artery?
@jackedfrog1@BasedSamParker@TPUSA@RealCandaceO@BlakeSNeff@AndrewKolvet The high-velocity shockwave passes through tissue, causing sudden, violent compression and expansion that shears blood vessels and muscles. If met with a foreign object (necklace), this could have caused the neck to burst at point of impact.
@jackedfrog1@BasedSamParker@TPUSA@RealCandaceO@BlakeSNeff@AndrewKolvet The body movement does not line up with being shot in the neck from any direction. The way in which his body contracted forward, with an impact indication somewhat center mass, lines up with an extremely powerful, direct isolated explosion.
@BasedSamParker@TPUSA@RealCandaceO@BlakeSNeff@AndrewKolvet Is it possible that the necklace could have snapped and the cross specifically could have swung around at such high velocity causing the puncture like wound in the left side carotid artery?
@RealCandaceO Here is another instance of either, inconsistencies in Frank Turek’s account of his phone activity on 9/10, or Victor Marx further inserting himself in the immediate aftermath of Charlie’s death. Could they both be true?
I realized during the podcast today. Hibbs wasn’t the only person that Frank Turek called… he also called Victor Marx. Mr. Turek, what really happened that day?
https://t.co/yMqDsiGtWH
I assume TPUSA still has this audio. They should release it if they disagree with the coverage today by @RealCandaceO.
If the Rode mic continued recording after Charlie was taken down, then it should be easy to put the Rode mic theory to bed.
🚨BREAKING:
A few days ago, Tucker told me Trump personally shut down the investigation into his own assassination attempt in Butler
Dan Bongino rebuked this claim, saying Trump was SATISFIED with the investigation
Well, I spoke to Joe Kent today, and he said Trump was NOT SATISFIED with the investigation!
He says even people inside the federal government couldn’t get straight answers on Butler.
He says Trump wasn’t satisfied with the investigation, but Kash and Dan told him Trump was.
First it was Tucker, and now it's the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center sounding the alarm!
And they are not the only ones
The DHS Inspector General also couldn't get answers.
Meanwhile, we're somehow supposed to believe the case is closed!
The shooter had a significant online footprint despite the public being told there was basically nothing there.
Federal officials wanted access to devices and information, but they couldn't get it.
Questions piled up, answers never came.
And then Joe says something that should terrify every American:
The bureaucracy can stonewall political appointees.
Think about that.
Political appointees chosen by the President of the U.S.
If that's true, then the alarming question is: Who actually runs the country?
Because if a former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center can't get straight answers...
If senior officials can't get straight answers...
Then what exactly is going on?
Interview with @joekent16jan19
Oh my God Charlie is solving his own murder and the attempted assassination of Trump beyond the grave, his words when he was here are mind-blowing This is a must-watch please share this is extremely important. I cannot believe that we all miss this. Please share!
@DiligentDenizen Likewise, Israel’s stance does not bind us to continue a forever war! The American people did not ask for it, and we surely should not be obligated to fund it and provide endless protection!
Absolutely wild to learn that Donald Trump called Charlie and reprimanded him about his coverage of the Epstein Files. On July 12th—the day after I keep insisting a made a decision to kill Charlie according to our timeline.
I have said over and over again, Tucker’s speech at SAS caused the psychopathic Zionists to begin targeting Charlie.
Also this absolutely makes my skin crawl about Erika hugging Trump. That woman is truly despicable. Anything BUT a legitimately grieving widow.
https://t.co/f3cQ3nAf9C
Tell Roseanne Barr that she is a has been! And literally no one cares about her opinion. This is More Spiritual manipulation from Tpusa!
This is one of the most intellectually dishonest abuses of Scripture I have seen in a while.
Those verses were written about systemic oppression, corrupt judges, legal injustice, and powerful people exploiting vulnerable widows who had no voice, no protection, and no means to defend themselves. They were not written to shield a wealthy, influential public figure from criticism, scrutiny, investigative questions, or public accountability.
What is happening here is not biblical interpretation. It is biblical weaponization.
People are ripping verses out of their historical and theological context, then swinging them around like a political baseball bat because they think quoting Scripture automatically wins an argument.
It doesn’t.
Erika Kirk is not a powerless widow in ancient Israel begging corrupt officials for justice. She is a public figure, fundraiser, media personality, and leader of a major national organization operating in the public square. Public figures receive public scrutiny. That is how accountability works.
The Bible absolutely commands believers to care for widows, defend the vulnerable, and oppose exploitation. But using those verses as a shield against legitimate questions or as a cudgel to attack critics is bad theology, bad hermeneutics, and frankly a disgraceful misuse of God’s Word.
Some of y’all treat Scripture like a weapon of convenience. You ignore the context, ignore the audience, ignore the purpose of the text, and then wonder why people accuse you of manipulating the Bible for political ends. This is why.
God’s Word deserves better than that.
For the last two days, I’ve said TPUSA is doing one of two things:
(1) Panicking because the context of the video doesn’t support what their claim, or
(2) Using Charlie’s corpse as a joke to “own” Candace.
They gleefully claim the second disgusting option.
Since everything they say is a lie, I don’t believe them. But either option is disgusting.
You guys are some of the dumbest people in the world to not consider that I’ve been sitting on Charlie’s Aspen video for the last 7 months. I am light years ahead of you toothless cogs who deserve nothing but the resentment you have earned from the entire world.
Since you are now shamelessly attempting to use an out of context text from 2021 to pretend that Charlie wanted to change the event from the YOUNG Women’s Leadership conference to a BoomerCon NagFest, here is the relevant portion from his Aspen donor event, (captured just 3 weeks before he died) where he carefully laid out his vision for the organization for over 2 hours. Please note Charlie’s explanation that the past and future vision was for YOUNG women to gather at YWLS.
…But I’m sure he changed his mind a week later, right?
You guys are some of the dumbest people in the world to not consider that I’ve been sitting on Charlie’s Aspen video for the last 7 months. I am light years ahead of you toothless cogs who deserve nothing but the resentment you have earned from the entire world.
Since you are now shamelessly attempting to use an out of context text from 2021 to pretend that Charlie wanted to change the event from the YOUNG Women’s Leadership conference to a BoomerCon NagFest, here is the relevant portion from his Aspen donor event, (captured just 3 weeks before he died) where he carefully laid out his vision for the organization for over 2 hours. Please note Charlie’s explanation that the past and future vision was for YOUNG women to gather at YWLS.
…But I’m sure he changed his mind a week later, right?
Lastly, the “you’re not his wife” talking point— in case you haven’t figured out, it has completely failed.
In fact, it reflects poorly on Erika, dumbass— so you may want to revert to your crisis PR teams the following:
Yes, Candace Owens, Baron Coleman, and millions of other people around are the world are NOT Charlie’s wife: that is precisely why the public is disturbed. Because people who are “not his wife” have from the very beginning expressed more interest in determining who the hell murdered Charlie Kirk.
You guys should dig deep for a talking point that doesn’t further shine a spotlight on why the public so fervently rejects the performance of his actual wife.
Hope this helps, loser.