Sue Davis

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

#savestarfleetacademy
I hope #Netflix or #Amazon picks it up.

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

I love Alan Cumming even more more after seeing this his monologue on Kimmel.
#TransPeopleAreSuperheros
https://t.co/oYgFLkM0Bk

[Protect Kamala Harris ✊ @DisavowTrump20]

🚨NEW: Donald Trump has renewed his attacks on MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, calling her “the enemy of the people” and hinting he may try to take her off the air.

RETWEET if you stand with @Maddow against Donald Trump!

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@CalltoActivism Stupid & delusional are not mutually exclusive. He is both.

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@TheRichFromCali 👍

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@OlenaRohoza I stand with Ukraine

[Protect Kamala Harris ✊ @DisavowTrump20]

🚨NEW: Donald Trump's lawyers are attempting to block the release of Jack Smith's report on Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents.

RETWEET to demand that Merrick Garland release the Jack Smith report!

[Morgan J. Freeman @mjfree]

❤️ if you want Jack Smith’s report on fuckhead released.

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@RossKneeDeep Yes please! In Riker's from 1/19/25 thru 1/21/29. Put him in Epstiens cell.

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

So happy #babylon5 is back on Prime...
Watching S3 Ep5.
Such an amazing show!
Thanks to @straczynski

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@MargaretAtwood It is not an option. It is an honest, human reaction to the fact the more than half the country opted to give a man with dementia the nuke codes and the power of the US government to torment & jail his perceived enemies.

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@DeadlineWH
3 cheers to all providing snacks & drinks to the people in line at Temple Univ. Hope there are also restroom facilities easily available!

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

The debate showed the difference between Trump & Vance.
Vance lies in complete sentences.

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@tribelaw Seems to me the Comstock act would apply equally to erectile dysfunction drugs. Maybe advocates for women's health care need to get loud about that.

[Occupy Democrats @OccupyDemocrats]

Retweet if you LOVE this!

[Kristy Greenberg @KGreenberg_]

The Presidential debate was painful, but the past 3 weeks of public attacks on Joe Biden from Democrats have been much worse.

First, they said Biden must show he has the physical and mental capacity to run. So he did. He held spirited rallies across the country. He subjected himself to harsh interviews. He showed his command of foreign policy at a press conference. Sure, there were gaffes. But that’s nothing new.

Next, people argued that the debate wasn’t one bad night; there was evidence of his mental decline before the debate. If true, why didn’t these same people say so before the debate? It’s also hard to square this with Biden’s strong record and his 🔥 SOTU in March.

Then the argument shifted: he’s fine now, but he won’t be in the future. To state the obvious, no one can predict the future, and we knew he was old when we voted for him. If in the future he can’t do the job, Kamala Harris can take over. That’s why we have Vice Presidents.

Now the argument has shifted yet again: polls show Biden can’t win. So the concern now isn’t about his ability to serve as President, but about his ability to win. But the continued attacks on him from his own party are likely contributing to his bad polls! And can we rely on polls to predict the election outcome 4 months from now? Are there polls showing another candidate winning against Trump by significant margins? Are bad polls a good reason to pressure a candidate who won the majority of his party’s votes to step down? The answer to each of these questions is no.

Stop coming up with excuses for why Joe Biden should step down. He said he’s running. The incessant public attacks from his own party weaken him as a candidate and divide the Democratic Party. It needs to end.

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@AriMelber I wonder if Carville has considered that all these calls for Biden to step aside because he "can't win" is a self fulfilling prophecy.

[Occupy Democrats @OccupyDemocrats]

BREAKING: Deeply corrupt Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas ignites a furious scandal by refusing to answer whether he ever paid back the massive $267,000 "loan" that he received from a millionaire executive.

And it gets even worse....

Democratic Senators Ron Wyden and Sheldon Whitehouse sent a letter to Thomas' attorney asking for an explanation for the "loan" from healthcare executive Anthony Welter which Thomas used to purchase a luxury RV.

In the letter, the senators point out that Thomas, a rabid Republican, never disclosed whether the $267,000 was paid back or forgiven.

If it was simply forgiven, that would mean it was actually a lump sum gift — or more accurately a bribe. The senators add that it would represent "a significant amount of taxable income."

"Your client’s refusal to clarify how the loan was resolved raises serious concerns regarding violations of federal tax laws," the senators wrote.

Finance committee investigators found that some interest on the "loan" had been paid back but the rest had been forgiven.

At this point, Thomas isn't even attempting to obscure his corruption. He's flaunting it in our faces because he believes that he's above the law. He's been selling our country out for decades to the super-rich in return for overt bribes.

We need a full, immediate investigation into Clarence Thomas. This man doesn't belong on the Supreme Court, he belongs in prison.

Please retweet and ❤️ if you support impeaching and removing Clarence Thomas from the Supreme Court — and consider joining the growing exodus to Tribel, a new pro-democracy social network that is exploding in popularity because Twitter and Facebook are trying to stop its growth — which is only making Tribel grow even faster. Please follow us on Tribel to get all of our breaking news alerts sent straight to your phone or computer by clicking the following link: https://t.co/HnJzSKjCwX

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@Liz_Cheney any chance your dad will take Trump duck hunting?

[Sue Davis @wnySue]

@allinwithchris @chrislhayes Any chance of getting a report on the number of atheist judges?