Gina

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

You've made a mistake. I need a real person/specialist to review my channel. You have flagged other creators for “inauthentic content,” but after a real person manually reviewed their channels, that decision was overturned and their monetization was restored. There are several cases like that across this platform, so I know it is possible.

It is not fair to make me wait another 90 days just to have a chance to reapply for the program when I have done nothing wrong. I have reviewed your policies, and my videos do not violate them.

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

Hello @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”

My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.

The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”

I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”

I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.

To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.

My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM

[Gina @wolfboyudk]

Vote for me in the gloomy bear costume contest!! https://t.co/gvvOFdgDe0

[Gina @wolfboyudk]

@EmmaFursuits @RBL_Heart @minimalusag3 Also the fact that he asked you more than once for WIP pics and you couldn’t be bothered to give them one. It shows you are getting nothing done. It’s about respecting the clients time. Again no disrespect to your loss. Losing pets is hard. Again atp refund it if u can’t do it.

[Gina @wolfboyudk]

@EmmaFursuits @RBL_Heart @minimalusag3 Zech also communicated with you and you didn’t give proper communication back. If I knew I couldn’t do a suit in the timeframe I’m giving I would give the person a full refund and apologize. Dragging someone for two years when your original was half a year to 18 month is crazy.

[Gina @wolfboyudk]

Binding of Isaac nails to celebrate the new update! :3

[🜏 Edmund McMillen 🜏 @edmundmcmillen]

28 minutes...

[Gina @wolfboyudk]

@DarrenMargolis_ @HCPSS One day kids won’t get to enjoy snow. Let these generations appreciate it while they still can. This isn’t lazy, this is for people’s safety. Do better.