What happened to President Trump?
From the Iran war to the Epstein files, to MAHA & mass deportations- what explains all of the reversals?
It is critical that we look past the emotions & ask the hard questions, because the answers will tell us who truly runs our nation.
BREAKING NEWS: Washington @Nationals Director of Community Relations Admits on Hidden Camera to Active Religious Discrimination Against Starting Pitcher Trevor Williams, Surveillance of Nationals Fans’ Google History, and Segregated LGBTQ+ Corporate Meetings to an O’Keefe Undercover Journalist
“One of our pitchers, Trevor Williams. He’s super Christian-Catholic, all these tattoos that mean a lot.”
“The Dodgers had a group… who were drag queens who sometimes dressed up as nuns. He [Trevor Williams] went on social media like… ‘This is my religion. You all are mocking it.’”
“Because of that, we [Washington Nationals] don’t use him [Trevor Williams] on social [media].”
“Like, when they're like, is a hot dog a sandwich? And like, the players come up, you know what I mean? Like, we [Nationals] don't ask him [Trevor Williams].”
“If you ever come to a Nats game, there is someone on our team who is responsible for figuring out everything about you and assigning you into a bucket of people. If you’re accepting cookies, we’re getting a plethora of your Google history.”
@heyhuds @MeLlamoTrevor@NationalsComms@MLB@MLB_PR
BOMBSHELL: Former Counterterrorism Director Joe Kent confirms the Zionist lobby marched in, dictated terms, and manipulated intelligence to force Trump into the Iran war.
He reveals if Americans knew how Israel dragged Washington into endless wars, they'd be furious!
Look how smarmy, uncomfortable, and outright evil the two Zio-puppets appear. They're incapable of fairly debating without controlling the 'frame' which they typically do by not allowing any questions. When faced with equals, all they can do is squirm and snark.
Precisely and why we have always said that the US needs to learn to be a great nation amongst equals. If not it faces total ruin. It is not rocket science. It cannot defeat China, economically, financially or militarily.
Xi:
Can China and the United States overcome the Thucydides Trap and create a new paradigm of major-country relations? Can we meet global challenges together and provide greater stability for the world? Can we build a bright future together for our bilateral relations in the interest of the well-being of the two peoples and the future of humanity? These are the questions vital to history, to the world and to the people.
🇷🇺 Putin drove himself to a Moscow hotel, walked in alone, picked up his 89-year-old first schoolteacher, and took her to dinner at the Kremlin.
Say what you want. That guy's special.
Nothing to see here:
With regards to this shooting incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, why exactly was JD Vance evacuated first and not Trump?
Why exactly are there images of the suspect, in this shooting, lying on the floor without so much as a scratch on him, after he stormed the venue firing shots.
Something clearly doesn't stack up.
Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem).
This has been explained over and over since day one.
Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying.
The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea.
During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul.
Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it
Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb.
The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability.
So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon.
And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult
Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world.
Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage.
Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions.
This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot
What the Gulf states are learning now—and what the Europeans will soon learn—is the danger of being frontline states for a declining hegemon. During the post–Cold War hegemonic era, the US was the only game in town, and the alliance system was a source of security. As the hegemon declines and uses its military more aggressively to prevent rivals from rising, frontline states get pummeled, and protection is gone. How to adjust to a multipolar world should be the focus of our security discussions - but our leaders are instead cosplaying WW2 and shutting down open discourse.
@VanessaBeeley I see the propaganda language of 'pre-emptive strikes' is being employed across X when the correct term should be 'unprovoked attack' by a gang of US-Israeli Zionist psychopaths.
WATCH: After meeting with Vice President JD Vance, Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi – a key mediator in the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks – tells @margbrennan "the peace deal is within our reach.” He also said, “I don't think any alternative to diplomacy is going to solve this problem.”
See the full interview.
I have always been a fan of @TuckerCarlson because he's always stood on the side of 'no more dumb wars' and has been outspoken - even pushing back on President Trump on occassion. But in this stmt here, he effectively *agrees* with those advocating war with Iran by claiming that reports of Israel threatening to use nuclear weapons against Iran should *force* the US to join alongside Israel in a conventional attack leading to regime change.
Tucker argues we would "have no choice" but to "shape" the conditions by fighting alongside Israel against Iran. But I argue there are DEFINITELY other options for the United States. In fact, fighting a conventional war that is against our national interest should never be conducted, and we should never be coerced into fighting a war desired by even a close ally when doing so is antethetical to our security (as this proposed attack most assuredly is).
Please see full episode: https://t.co/L2RhNWBur1
Thank you. At last, people are starting to get it. What Ritter explains below is why I KNEW beforehand that Trump would NOT attack Iran. I said as much explicitly on @Glenn_Diesen podcast as everyone's head was exploding. Do not succumb to psyops, they're coming from all sides. And don't LISTEN to Trump: WATCH what he does instead.
🚨 While everyone watched Venezuela, Trump quietly put CANADA in the crosshairs.
Why? Because this isn't regime change—it's a strike on the City of London's offshore banking empire that's been laundering cartel money for 50 years.
Even MI6 admits this is something new.