Assume the movie had flopped and the director lost his entire $750,000 investment. How many crew members would have voluntarily returned their fees to help offset his loss?
This is the fundamental asymmetry in risk and reward. When someone puts up their own capital and shoulders the real financial risk especially in a high-failure industry like entertainment they alone bear the downside.
Yet the moment the project succeeds, suddenly everyone who was paid upfront wants a bigger piece of the pie. The same people who would not have shared in the loss now feel entitled to share disproportionately in the upside.
If you accept payment for your work regardless of outcome, youโve already been compensated for your risk (or lack thereof). Why should the person who risked everything not be allowed to reap the rewards when their gamble pays off?
*World Cup starts*
France : We have Mbappe , Dembele and Olise
Argentina : We have Messi
Norway : We have erling haaland
Other countries : Tactics, total football, and advanced football knowledge
The subplot on Brazilian Twitter :
Iโm a man.
I enjoyed the movie because it shed light on exactly how incels like you think and act towards women.
Even after watching a movie where the plot revolves around an incel man destroying a womanโs life, you still try to blame women.