@MetaruSonikku_ i think it's a good way of representing the internal struggle some people deal with when coming to terms with their gender identity. it helps contextually that the show takes place in 2017 and that Jax is filipino american. very troubling time + potentially religious background
@HANGALLRAPISTS @ohza_hra @DingoOfDingos this is a real question, not trying to bullshit you, just bear with me:
for example, if im aroused by werewolves because they're big, strong, possessive, and potentially cuddly, and not because of the animal features, that's fair game?
@HANGALLRAPISTS @ohza_hra @DingoOfDingos so if you don't get sexual pleasure at the thought of animals then you aren't a zoophile
but then that brings into question, what constitutes as the thought of animals? what is the bare minimum? is it werewolves? anime catgirls?
@hoothathuh@ashkat_t@realZexzyz@UTD_Niko@JackS14932@Marvin49@AmoneyResists funnily enough, and this is basically semantics so you don't have to acknowledge this, but "opposite" doesn't only mean the direct converse of something, it can also just mean "different". as long as the sentiment differs from the original point, it opposes it, or is "opposite"
@hoothathuh@ashkat_t@realZexzyz@UTD_Niko@JackS14932@Marvin49@AmoneyResists looking at it, the journalist who wrote the headline was direct with its wording—there's nothing ambiguous about "bill says donald was not involved with jeff"—but given that it's derived from an ambiguous statement, that means the journalist made a jumping to conclusions fallacy
@nicksortor i'm seeing comments about this being pro-establishment because trump is a republican but nothing so far about how it's anti-establishment because trump is literally just a businessman