온점

💜

[온점 @wouldYou_space]

내가 메갈로고만들엇으면 3개월?실사용에 타겟층 마음속에 불멸의 아이콘된이야기로 마케팅도서3개쓰고 평생안주함

[헌민형(법) @Hmhlaw]

솔직히 대본보고 선택했을건데
여기 출연한 남배우들 싹다 안좋게 보게됨
이딴 여혐을 확대재생산하는데 기여하기를 자발적으로 선택했단 거잖아

[duzzonkoo @realm_lovely13]

전자발찌가 박근혜업적이구나
후대 여성정치인은 전자발찌를 목에차거나 핑크색으로 바꾸는 법을 만들어줬으면 한다

[온점 @wouldYou_space]

씨발 이준석좋아하는씹남끼리안경척하며 서로 똥꼬쑤셔주면 누가봐

[엔두인2.0 @InEndu8888]

bl만화 그리는 사람들 광고때리는거보면
"어떤 자지달린새끼가 저딴 행동을 함?"
이라고 느껴지는 부분이 너무 많음
뿐만아니라 여작가들이 남자 표현할때 좀 자지떨어진부분들이 많긴함 (강연금, 나루토 제외)

겐고로 만화 시리즈 강제 정주행 시켜야
남자의 행동적 특질을 이해할수있을텐데

[@슈-크림《🐈‍⬛🌟》 @Ash__Captain]

남성향 여캐들도 실제 여성이랑 괴리된 행동을 하니까 그냥 서로 판타지를 존중해주기로 합시다

[네엥 @intotheNARAKA]

남자 수영선수는 상 줬잖아
이 분께도 상 줘

[온새☘️ @osoooossss]

사귀었던 어린 여자배우는 생활고 시달리며 알바하는데도 욕처먹고
괴로워서 삶을 포기했는데

저 남자배우는 논란있어도 광고모델하고 몸편하게 잘살면서 웃는낯짝으로 연예계 활동복귀하는거 너무 보기싫어

[도도담 @Kaokik1234]

성매매 마담출신인데 좆달고 여자인척하고 여혐발언 지리게해서 (여자가 남자 집에 초대하는건 섹뜨자는거니 섹거부ㄴㄴ라든지 개머저리발언 ㅈㄴ함)

[코로세🎗 @putsipim]

저거 전부 합친거보다 동덕여대생들 락카칠이 더 중범죄인 나라 한국..;

[포포(상태:락스타) @popoispoor1234]

섹스는 싫은 점이 아니라 생물학적 여성에게 가해지는 위험도가 높아서 나뉜 겁니다
여성의 생존권이 만만하신가요?

[딸기초코 @Alphagirllover]

정신병자가 존재한다고 그의 조현병이 현실인 것은 아니지... 그의 조현병에 맞춰 연기해줄 의무도 없고

[Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_]

J.K. Rowling is a modern day civil rights hero

[Tiffany ⚢ Woman4Women @Woman4W]

@jk_rowling All the real witches have your back no matter what you decide to do, but I can only speak for myself when I say how relieved I am you held her to account, rather than accepting an ill-forged and unearned peace offering from a torch bearer of a failed, poorly-dressed lynch mob. 🥂

[Janet Inglis @ThatAussieWoman]

I'm proud of you.
I feel silly to feel proud of a woman I don't know and probably have no right to feel proud of.
But I feel proud of you for standing up and voicing so clearly and unequivocally the affrontery, insult, hurt, and subdued anger most of us have felt at the hands of people we were once close to.
You expressed it for all of us perfectly.
I'm sorry it was so personal and dangerous for you.
I hope this brilliant post was somewhat cathartic.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.

I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.

Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.

However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.

When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.

The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.

Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?

I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.

The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.

Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.

[맛터 @masterofblt]

어제 넷플에서 드라마 <참교육> 공개됐는데 역시나 원작이 논란됐던 만큼 내용이 가관임

남자들이 열광하는 거짓 미투 무고녀 신화 에피소드인데 성범죄 피해자들한테 피눈물 흘리게 하려는 의도가 다분하죠?

결론은 그런 여자를 참교육 시킨다는 내용인데 21세기에 이게 무슨 감성이냐

[Zachary Elliott @zaelefty]

@allendh Gender identity is a statement based belief system. It has no objectivity, only subjective feelings.

[Zachary Elliott @zaelefty]

There is no biological basis for gender identity.

Brain studies haven’t found one.
Genetic studies haven’t found one.

Change my mind.

[브래드용 빵 @beulaedeuy652]

놀랍게도 인권말하는 분들에겐 죽음에도 귀천이 있음ㅋㅋㅋ여자가 강간살해당하는건 개가 똥을 싸듯 자연스러운 현상인데 트젠이 자기 요구 안들어준다고 분에못이겨 자살하는건 엄청난 비극이며 인류의 책임이고 이들의 요구를 모두 들어줘서 소중한 생명을 지켜야한다고 거룩하고 비장해짐

[아마 @AMAmeansMaybe]

근데 여심표를 놓친게 아니고 본인들이 버린거잖아
왜케 안타깝게 놓친 것처럼 말함

[두사 @onbeingher]

성별 불쾌감의 실재가 정신적 성별(=성 정체성)의 실재를 자동으로 증명해주지 않음.

시스젠더 라벨링을 반대하는 이유

1. 트랜스젠더의 소수자성을 증명하기 위해 허상의 권력이 부여되는 정치성
2. 신체 성별과 정신 성별의 일치라는 정의에서 “정신 성별”을 증명해내지 못함
3. 멸칭으로 기능함