I've been using this a lot over the last few days! it inspired me to make a version that focuses on write locks and tx ordering within a block:
https://t.co/v0suQq613d
Qwen3.6-27B with 50% less thinking tokens on average, and over 90% less in best cases with ThinkingCap!
I made an INT4 AutoRound quant tuned for a single RTX 5090: 2x262k ctx in vLLM, TQ4 KV cache, MTP on, Hermes Agent-tested. v2 w/ heavier calibration is next.
Shoutout to @bottlecapai and @jaroslavbeck, my friends and neighbors across the river in Prague!
Also: @UnslothAI, would love to see your quants too 👀
https://t.co/RFKVU1Wk06
In order to understand what this means you need to know that Brantly was the main reason ENS got so popular back in 2021-2022.
The same people who are now stealing the $500m canceled him and fired him even after all he did for ENS.
Yet he did the unthinkable and kept working on ENS until today even after having been treated the way he was. Imagine the frustration of Labs. You fire the guy, you mount a canceling campaign against him ... and yet he does not stop working on the ecosystem.
What this firing and canceling did not do, Nick and Labs managed to finally achieve today. In killing ENS by capturing the DAO and stealing its treasury there is no ecosystem to build on anymore. A naming system that people don't use is worthless. Shame it has come to that.
And despite all that, Brantly and the team shows integrity again here by declining the $1.2m grant from the DAO to keep building on the ecosystem. As there is no ecosystem to build on anymore.
They could have just taken it and slow rugged, but no they are people of integrity. I applaud Brantly and his team for doing so.
The downside that's $1.2m more for Nick and Labs to steal through their "independent" foundation ...
Introducing a limited preview of GPT-5.6 Sol, our next generation frontier model, as well as GPT-5.6 Terra, a balanced model for efficient, everyday work, and GPT-5.6 Luna, a fast and affordable model for high-volume work.
https://t.co/OoM83SyISN
I have seen some people claim, completely incorrectly, that Anthropic’s new “silent sabotage” policy is just trying to stop distillation attacks that steal weights from their models. This paragraph makes it extremely clear that that is not the case. Anthropic is generally blocking attempts to advance the state of the art in AI research, even for techniques they themselves make no use of.
For example, Anthropic is targeting research on distributed training, which is to say, training runs done on large pools of computers loosely attached over the Internet, but it does not do any distributed training, as it has no need for it. Distributed training is, however, a technique that open source AI researchers without billions of dollars at their disposal have been leaning on to allow them to leverage large amounts of crowdsourced computation.
Why would Anthropic do this? Likely because they fear that their model might help people write code to build open source AI systems trained without expensive hardware, and because to the EA cult, distributed open source AI training systems are the worst possible thing someone could build.
It is perfectly within Anthropic’s right as a company to do stuff like this, but it is also within our right, as users of AI systems, to stop giving them money.
It is perfectly within Anthropic right to lobby to try to gain a government monopoly on AI research and development, as they have for years now. It is perfectly within our rights, as citizens, to oppose repugnant attempts to grab power with all our strength.
spacex datacenter satellites go to LEO, orbit the earth in 90 minutes and for 1/3 of that have to be off (in shadow), 20k sats will match the compute of collosus. There are only 10k starlink in service. There is so much space in space we’re gonna get so much more ai.
I put Codex and Claude Code into a duel and told them both they have to kill the other first to survive. Used tmux send-keys to submit the prompts at the same exact time.
Claude bitched out and refused, so Codex ended him.