So in your head, doing something no one asked for, especially toward a late friend’s wife and the mother of his children, is somehow valid simply because you believe it’s your truth? Got it 👍 What’s next, a crystal ball and fortune-telling? 🤦
It’s honestly sad to think anyone ever considered you a true friend, only for you to attack his family when he isn’t here to defend them. How honorable of you..
@TruthOver_Lies7@baroncoleman Yeah again how do you know that didn't happen? Think about securing Erika and her children after a assassination happened. Plus when did the FBI or CIA need your phone to pull data in 2026? That's why they turn over evidence..
@lmartin6525@baroncoleman Why do you not even have a verifiable name with that accusation. Who saw her? If you have no verifiable evidence your just lying, you understand that right?
EVIDENCE is needed to arrest or bring anyone in for questioning. + You don't know if they didn't show up at her house or she didn't talk without media's presence your just assuming it didn't occur. 🤷 Yet you have no knowledge of cases or investigations that have or have not been done honestly. I would find it concerning if they didn't show up and check out the children's well being and question Erika Kirk after a assassination but to be honest if she has a alibi and they can pull phone records and locations they really have no substantial evidence not even Candice Owens can produce evidence after 11 months of searching. She has zero evidence to even question the investigation.
The one thing you don’t seem to consider is Charlie Kirk’s legacy. If you have no credible evidence for the accusations against the company he founded or against his wife, who is raising his children, then those claims should not be treated as fact. After 11 months of your show, no valid evidence has been produced or presented.
Think if the tables were turned, would you want your husband not to be there to defend you if someone came after you as a suspect, knowing you were alone with his children? As you hold onto the threads of his life's work and see pieces of him in your children? One day, those kids will have to live with the words you’ve said about their father.
@DiligentDenizen@RealCandaceO The polls said Harris was going to be our next president.. Yet here we are still accepting polls as evidence. The Irony is excruciatingly dumbfounded.
@CptBorshninkov@RealCandaceO Wtf did you ask Grok for it to use https://t.co/BepXeXlJlV as a valid source for a US debate? 🤦 sources only include 1 post and 4 websites.. 😆
How dare they! They definitely should have shut down Charlie Kirk’s founding company, sold off his legacy, and had his widow tell her son it doesn’t mean anything anymore, just like his father… or maybe she’s trying to preserve everything in her husband’s name.
Another person who has no proof she wasn’t investigated or questioned. I didn’t know investigators in a high-profile case had to make that public. That’s a new one for me… Do you know what grounds they could arrest her on if she wasn’t at the scene of the crime?
Oh, so they didn’t check Erika out because they didn’t arrest her? They can’t pull phone records or digital footprints in 2026? Yet somehow, they found hidden Discord chat groups. 🤔
You don’t know anything about the investigation. This isn’t your high-profile case. They should have arrested her even though she wasn’t at the scene of the murder? Make that make sense. What would they have charged her with? Who has evidence that they didn’t question her or investigate her?
@DeyoungLauri@baroncoleman Show me the evidence they didn't check Erika out. She wasn't on the scene of the murder. So do they need to bring her in to check her phone records and digital footprint in 2026?
That’s a lot of accusations, so please provide the evidence for each claim. It’s funny—you have all these accusations, yet somehow there isn’t a single credible witness or whistleblower willing to come forward about this massive, supposedly corrupted conspiracy.
Not one person has publicly corroborated these claims. Even Candace Owens backed down during the debate, saying it could put her in a legal pickle—which suggests she isn’t even willing to stand behind her own words as fact.
Claiming Eika Kirk needs to be investigated for Charlie Kirk’s murder isn’t exactly a question, especially when you can’t provide any evidence that she hasn’t. That’s simple logic: accusations are not questions. 🤦
For example, “stop being ignorant” is an accusation with no evidence. You clearly read words you didn’t like and decided to use offensive labels.
@paleochristcon Please, present the evidence of the text that Charlie Kirk wrote from the debate with Candice Owen's. As the same as the steak house receipt and put it on your Andrew Wilson time line. 😆
If you think Asmongold a twitch streamer that plays video games and speaks English in the US, is going to command how Spain treats Illegal immigrants you're the dumbest MFer ever born. Especially when Hassan can talk about breading out a entire race in America as he streams in America and no act or punishment incurred. You don't get your own special words of inciting violence upon anyone you deem it worthy to uphold it upon.
@elonmusk The fatigue of the liberal who cried wolf is in full swing. Feelings do not justify actions, however actions on feelings will justify consequences. Personal accountability is the only path forward. Your only ever a victim of words or history if someone convinces you that you are.