@maxprat just because people don’t care doesn’t mean we have to stop having conversations about what art is. in fact I’d welcome a constructive debate on this
@maxprat I disagree. It’s really not about stopping/reversing ai. the issue is much bigger, about us being consumed by device that discourages critical thinking. This is the exact time to talk about art. Let a device be a device, we don’t call a pencil a great artist just coz it can draw
@maxprat human artists have been stealing from each other before computers were a thing. by calling out its problematic existence we don’t expect it will go away. jo hai so hai.
its not just about art/artists anymore, more about overconsumption of devices to distract us from reality
@noheeriye in art, there is a thin line between inspiration and theft :) one is deep admiration, the other is blank replication without integrity. it’s easy to confuse the two. a lover of art gets inspired and creates, a device copies. hope this helps!
it is decidedly not art, for the simple reason that art is far less about the image on the surface and far more about the artist & consumer’s feelings. art necessitates human suffering. ai is plain skill, and plain skill—even in human hands—without feeling means nothing.
this is not to shame anyone, your opinions on ai are your own. my opinion is that you—the consumer—deserve real art. you deserve to feel things, you deserve to experience the complex emotions that come with being human.
@shashxshoyo by human suffering I do not mean one has to necessarily go through harrowing ordeals to make art. but every artist who really practices their art suffers through the ordeal of bringing pain and joy together, and feeling something as complex as this is not a computer skill
@GoshtHardware Relax, it’s called classic literature, which means that the writing stands the test of time.
Human relatability was not invented by the internet 🙂