@UnseenWyoGal@Rach4Patriarchy I don’t need to justify my claim to you. There are countless examples online and on Youtube. Google if you want a sample. Most people on this thread are familiar with the behavior and Debate style of the Wilsons. Start with his debate with Charlie.
@UnseenWyoGal@Rach4Patriarchy You’re right. He’s never gone off on anyone. Never. Most gracious online. Lol. What head in the sand nonsense is this? Nobody is buying it.
@UnseenWyoGal@Rach4Patriarchy Let me clear it up. If you are giving someone the benefit of the doubt as to their motives, you don’t go ape shit on them when they challenge your narrative. There are numerous examples of this with Wilson. But yes, he’s the Mother Theresa of the Internet in your world.
@Joshua_the_car There’s a video going around of her arriving at a concert, greeting admirers. She looked calm and happy. Do you try and be original or just frame everything through what the other low IQ extreme right influencers spit out?
@UnseenWyoGal@Rach4Patriarchy I’ve watched, and your generic, superlative declaration isn’t even remotely true. Even if he’s slow to assert motives, his negative reactions would suggest otherwise. What we act on is far more telling than what we say.
@mel_as81@Rach4Patriarchy Go and watch Jordan Peterson debate Cathy Newman. Then go watch Andrew debate someone named Charlie. The result and effect of the approach is self evident. One maintains the masculane frame (Peterson) and one looks completely out of control (Wilson).
@etherspin@Rach4Patriarchy@whatever@paleochristcon “If a man say, I love God, but hateth his brother, he is a liar, for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen” 1 John 4:20
@julzfol1923@TheBuzzwrecker@Rach4Patriarchy Liberals change all the time. The demonization of the other side is a big part of the problem. Most people are only into a few issues on one side or the other. Most don’t understand the history of the political ideology they are claiming. Hate and anger surely won’t persuade.
@TheBuzzwrecker@Rach4Patriarchy LMAO. Is that his name? I’m sorry, I’ll say Charlie Kirk. I did call him Kirk earlier if that helps. “Give me the creeps” sounds pretty effeminate to me. The ad hominen too. Lol. Grow up!
@Rach4Patriarchy My lane or point has more to do with what is the end point of debate? To hurt the person or draw them to the light? One might say to love. To do good to them who hate you. I don’t know, bless them that curse you. Might make a greater impact.
@Magoo21565@Rach4Patriarchy I’m not judging anyone’s heart. I’ve seen more than a couple of clips. They don’t get that their approach counteracts any possible good intent.
@Rach4Patriarchy I have never seen a man speak to women the way Andrew does, and try and justify it. Contrast Andrew’s approach to the OF crowd with Kirk’s approach. Who is more likely to be drawn to the light of Christ in those exchanges?
@MegynKellyShow Megyn, what is with your obsession with other people’s marriages. Clearly divorce is good to you, but decent people don’t agree. Mind your own maybe.