Eating bone soup rn

Machine work progressively replaces value in the reproduction of labour-power to restore periodic profitability, capital hoards this productive capacity.

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

If you want to read my claim in these threads as 1 &/or read Grok’s response, scroll to bottom to my last input.

https://t.co/YvCaKq8UET

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

Once you recognise the machine’s metabolism, the variable isn’t labour. Labour is only ever concrete labour, the magnitude of machine work reducing concrete labour in the reproduction of labour-power is the variable.

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

Thermodynamics says: unpaid work ≠ unpaid labour. That’s not my opinion, it’s science.

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

Key post.

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

Unpaid work ≠ unpaid labour.

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

The capital required to create the machine is created out of thin air by banks - on the proviso future sales pays it back. Once the capital is repaid, capitalists literally get free stuff to sell.

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

If Marxism is dialectical materialism, then how does machine work become unpaid labour time whilst never breaking Marx’s axioms plus the scientific axiom 4.?

1.Labour = human work specifically: Capital Vol. 1, Chapter 7:

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

If you want to read my claim in these threads as 1 &/or read Grok’s response, scroll to bottom to my last input.

https://t.co/YvCaKq8UET

[Eating bone soup rn @wrongwan]

Machines equal labour free stuff.

It’s that basic.

Capitalists get free stuff to sell.