@___Grig____@BaronBlaze_BoB@capeshitsucks You do know that Spiderman 2099 is the name of the comic and not his alias right? He literally goes by spiderman, same with Noir.
@ryanhealy@zazuch1@Ian13802@ChilluminatiPod Honestly, there's no convincing either camp. You see it as obvious plagiarism, others see it as coincidence through use of sources that may have plagiarized Katz without their knowledge. At this point, he just needs to shut up and get his lawyers involved.
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod It's possible they drew the conclusion from more than one source, I don't know. I haven't read through the entire congressional transcript. Or it could be from knowing of France and Italy at the time and going from there. I'm not sure we'll agree there, so yeah, have a good one.
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod Ah yes "blending" the ever so complicated word that no one else has ever used or ever thought to use to describe an event where things mix.
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod I'm not fucking saying it wouldn't. Jesus Christ, what I'm saying, and have been saying is that it's entirely possible, and even within reason - even if it doesn't appear that way to you - that literally all of this is coincidental, because it fucking happened to me.
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod Listen, I don't know what exactly you want me to tell you. I can see where someone who has background knowledge on the countries mentioned in this section can draw that conclusion. It's also not the only source that mentions the 500,000 man march. I can't give you all the answers
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod I don't see it that way, and maybe it's because I had to fight a false plagiarism claim made against me for similar reasons to this. But I don't believe this is as cut and dry as you think it is.
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod The two paragraphs above the The "McCormack-Dickstein Committee Investigation" make it pretty easy for someone to draw a similar conclusion if you have enough background knowledge of those countries mentioned. At least I'm able to.
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod They have not provided the script to the public, have stated they have one, and are willing to provide it. I do not know how they've cited the script. I know how fucking footnotes and citation works being pedantic really makes you feel good doesn't it?
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod They provided the sources they've used but don't provide the specific moments each source was used for. Though it appears to be from this one: https://t.co/4ZykN5TNfx
@liddlea4@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod They provided their sources. And got all the information provided from them. The wording is similar, yes. Plagiarism, no. That's why you can rebuttle plagiarism claims.
@JobbyJilkers@ryanhealy@ChilluminatiPod Correct, and they used other provided sources to gather all the information found in the books, just like the writer of the book did.
@Rainman_I_Am @StevenAlleyn@higunner00@KatzOnEarth@ChilluminatiPod@JesseCox You sound like you're a real fun person to be around. It take a lot of effort to be that condensending while using way too many elipses, or does it just come naturally?
@Rainman_I_Am @StevenAlleyn@higunner00@KatzOnEarth@ChilluminatiPod@JesseCox Okay. So if you site all your sources used. And you don't use one book that says all the same info from your sources, you still plagiarized this other book you had no knowledge of and now owe him some kind of credit despite never using his shit?