@spacersbackup@stepfanie You're not capable of addressing the snowballing nature of your position and its affects on people's willingness to trust people to be responsible with those programs. We're already seeing some of it play out with trump... Enjoy it happening more now that the door is open
@spacersbackup@stepfanie You just didn't get it. You've completely ignored my point... Not going to bother anymore.
You really are just looking for any excuse to avoid the point and just spout the buzz words, "unions, capitalism"...
@renooner1@spacersbackup@stepfanie Oh no Orwell warned us!
"Beware the man that follows the rules and aligns themselves against the freedoms to shit on the subway platforms"
You keep shifting to unionization and capitalists when the actual point was about declining social norms. Dismissing things like blasting music in shared spaces as minor nuisances ignores how repeated tolerance of that behavior erodes trust. When trust is low, people naturally become more skeptical of expanding welfare - because they see the same disregard for shared responsibility. That’s not overreacting. That’s the direct result of the tolerance you’re defending.
Laws that prevent public defecation, murder threats, and theft = police state?
You said they were minor, I pointed out real world examples that aren't and how your neglect further hurts many of your missions. Social cohesion affects the right's view on welfare too... Everything of the left is hurt by not enforcing social cohesion.
You responded with some seizure of socialism and the police state. Boring.
If social norms can't be upheld... Why would any right winger compromise with your positions?
Ex... Public transport. Why would I ever compromise with the left on funding of that or high speed rail... When they allow anti-social behavior like being threatened to be stabbed over telling someone it's a shared space and maybe they are being rude for blasting their Bluetooth speaker... Or you know... Actively taking a shit on the subway platform.... Or you know normalizing turnstile jumping...
Please... People like you think my narrative is anger at rejection.
Meanwhile it's their very company that offends me more often than not. Swaths of women have the personality of a paper bag. Merely regurgitating celebrity gossip slop and discussing fashion accessories.
You don't have the rhetoric tools to combat my points if you think my post was about my relationship with women - as you clearly did. You just had to ad-hom me because you can't contend with the fact that women behave in a way that turns them into a perpetual laughing stock.
Years of feminism, and women still act contradictory to the things they say - and knowingly so, rely on crying as a tool, I could go on...
But sure... Don't take my advice on adjusting your behavior during an all time onslaught of men not giving a fuck about women... Cause "I get no pussy" according to the Internet man that didn't like my astute comments.
This is particularly the point that highlights suspicion.
Spencer Pratt failing to make it to the final 2 was reasonable. The vote share between the 2 Dems so consistently being increasingly inverted as the votes are continually counted... It's reasonable to be suspicious how the more unpopular dem is so staggeringly more popular in these later batches.
@SternShark@Cw85Rocinante Point to me a small single audit that that wasn't a trivial recount?
The only "true" audit was from Maricopa, and was memory holed over some post-audit fights about the information handling.
Well... Every attempt to get evidence historically has been met with, "you can't investigate this because there's no proof voter fraud happens at scale".
But if you want to deny that it's at least a little suspicious the breakdown of dem votes coming in late not reflecting earlier sentiment and being skewed towards Nithya.... People have taken stances that were more stupid... But I wouldn't brag about this to anyone.
The large part of the recommendations here are so poor. The future of TV/Movies is bleak.
I mean... "The Big Bang Theory" is addictive enough to forget the world exists?
Also... the people recommending "Breaking Bad"... you're not recommending a show to someone just discovering there are tools more sophisticated than a carrier pigeon... what a cliche and obvious recommendation.
"Oh you're thirsty and looking for a drink? Have you heard of this thing called 'water'?"
Denims was a unique case that:
- used the totality of the video
- and very clearly made a claim that could easily be regarded as admission of intending to be a market substitute.
The temporary ruling could be the "right" ruling - that doesn't mean it was clear. Your comparisons are all to situations that are so much more obvious.
Love the stupidity we're watching unfold here.
Can't wait to accidentally tick off the drive-thru worker about sauce packets and be justifiably stabbed because there's no store policy that they HAVE to give me sauce and didn't like my tone.
Karmelo Anthony defense attorneys called their first witness. Centennial High School football and track coach Adam Linwood has taken the stand. He's not aware of any policies of track athletes not being allowed to go into other team's tents areas.
@CBSNewsTexas
@bmwisswell Your analogy implies that any medium published is akin to a shared resource like a sidewalk. Even if I were to agree with the temporary judgement that Denims is innocent - there are implications that make the situation far grayer than any analogy you're using.
@DenimsTV Denims is such an inspiration. The precedent was necessary.
Can't wait to destroy Hollywood by streaming my "reaction" to entire movies while simultaneously expressing/documenting that my doing so was entirely for the purposes of hurting Hollywood.
Thanks for the precedent
@deadguynoises@SoCalCMH@LeighWolf If the processes of exercising constitutional rights are important to be made easier to facilitate. Can I assume that you are consistent in thought and want to do away with background checks, wait times, or whatever hurdles impede my constitutional right to bear arms?