Hello, if you were an Elrond old friend of mine reading this, hi again and I apologize for being gone.
Lots of (+) and (-) in the past but let's move forward for the good of all.
I'm trying to be back on X now to help and contribute. Please be kind 🙂🤞
Our #MultiversX village is still too small, and running one big market drains the limited resources we have.
Now another big market is opening, and they're using tricky tactics to compete.
If only we could work together to attract more tourists... $EGLD
Especially in such uncertain periods, it's extremely easy to fall for scapegoating.
Why we do that? It's human psychology, we prefer to blame something instead of facing inconvenient truths.
Some truths you'd not like to admit yourself:
- All xLaunchpad startups raised and sold EGLD
- Lot of projects earn EGLD fees and sell them to fund development
- Foundation sell tokens on the market to fund protocol development and operational expenses
- Validators sell lots of EGLD. They are doing a service, securing the chain and profiting for doing so.
- Even validators that are contributing, sell EGLD to fund their project or initiatives
Sell blaming makes no sense, especially if directed against actors building and providing value to the chain and their investors. I know it's an hard truth to swallow, but many should simply internalize it.
We could make a case for those selling without contributing. But it's their right to do so.
The issue is not builders selling, but rather the fact that as an ecosystem (and crypto sector I'd say) we still didn't create on MultiversX big on-chain economies making projects largely profitable. An issue? We're all still building and pushing for such 100x bigger on-chain economies to be created, it's still an ongoing effort.
If something, we NEED the contribution of new builders to shape those new economies. Economies are made of many moving parts cooperating and generating value (yeah guys I know the word "cooperation" is scary for many, sorry).
We need them.
But such individuals with their attitude:
- Drives motivation down for current builders who then lack motivation or even leave the chain
- Scare new users and investors, who would never join such a toxic environment when there are no positive vibes (such individuals did this exact same thing all along against everone, it's a never ending battle and not directed specifically at Hatom but happening for years)
- Keep away new potential projects
Imagine being said MultiversX is technically good and has a good community, but then seeing projects being targeted and attacked for everything. Surely not welcoming (and it adds to the already insane difficulty of attracting new projects and users to a "new" chain like MultiversX).
I CAN'T keep receiving DMs of people telling me they wish we leave this chain cause of such individuals. It's frustrating, considering I spend so much time and energy trying to make it successful and contributing.
"Yeah but Hatom/foundation/projects could spend less/better"
I'd say fair, but:
- Projects invest into development that not always gives fruits short-term, so how to valuate?
- Building, maintaining, improving quality projects requires resources
- They may sell, but also create value on the chain keeping it alive, keeping/attracting investors & new liquidity (be honest with yourself and imagine the chain without Hatom the past 2 years)
- Startups are meant to not be as efficient as established projects; they need to iterate, fail, face challenges before refining a solid business model. Those not going through this process are unicors.
- Cutting costs may also mean doing trade-offs (e.g. not treating security seriously and avoiding expensive but needed audits) which add risks to users and keeps away potential big players who would never use "amateur" projects with no relevant audits.
- May mean not having the same customer support, or not having the same BD and marketing efforts.
Lot of damage has already been done with smear campaigns or attacks right and left for years, now turning into scapegoating. Scapegoating is never a good thing and since it doesn't address the root problem, it'll never solve the issue even if successfully killing the designated "enemy".
The founders, which the immature kid is calling "grifters", allocated also their own money into these businesses. They're betting on these projects' (Hatom and Soul) future success same way as me, you and others are doing. Such attacks are simply unfair and malicious.
I know you'd like to hear hype things, reassurances about 100% success probabilities and great things happening on the projects you like.
But reality is that lots of crypto projects are building hard, innovating and growing; creating value requires time, challenges to overcome, criticism (and damn, MultiversX community is great at auto-sabotaging itself), and of course risks. And, even more important, it takes time.
If there was certainty about projects or blockchains succeeding, you'd already see them ranked at the top.
You either trust builders/projects/foundations generating value long-term, or you don't. Frame it this way, and don't let frustration make you a doomer. We're building and pushing; give builders time, some will succeed big.
I said these things when such attacks were directed (and still are unfortunately) to the MultiversX foundation, and I say them again now when they're directed at Hatom. Nothing changes, only the target.
This tweet will not make those users change idea same as I didn't succeed much defending MultiversX foundation. It'll hopefully be relevant for some.
Let's focus on what matters, the mission to make DeFi great again. We'll go through all challenges and win.🫡
xPortal: Where AI Meets Web3 at Scale
While most crypto wallets fight over features, MultiversX quietly built a SuperApp.
Not just a wallet
Not just DeFi
Not just a chat app
@xPortalApp is Web3 + AI + UX — packaged for a billion people.
Let’s unpack it 🧵
@crypto_verse_X @Subjectnumber2 It's an uphill battle 😄
I think most people know this, but they are still fighting. Regardless of the users, what's been built is still valuable.
So, be fair don't just write us off 😄
@mihaieremia@Romsty Feel free to drop the data. I'm sure we have plenty of volunteers who will help process it and make it easy for everyone to understand.
Now is a good time to band together and fix the issues in the ecosystem.
Listen to CZ.
Stick to fundamentals. The ticker is $EGLD, the native token of @MultiversX
✅High developer activity & daily active users
✅30% royalties for smart contract developers
✅Staking rewards up to 7.5%
Not the best price action ATM, but it's an amazing L1. DYOR💡
In a world where technology races forward, few stop to ask: Are we building a future we truly want?
Discover #MultiversX: the blockchain born for tomorrow.
Not just faster. Not just bigger. But smarter, greener, and ready.
⚡ Engineered for infinite scale
With cutting-edge sharding, MultiversX handles 30,000 transactions per second today (and will grow effortlessly as the world demands more).
⚡ Speed at the cost of almost nothing
300 million+ transactions completed, each at lightning speed and for just $0.001. No matter the pressure, the network holds strong: constant, reliable, unstoppable.
⚡ Built to last, designed to care
Over 10,000 nodes power a global network on simple hardware; consuming less energy than you’d imagine, and offsetting more CO₂ than it produces since 2021.
🌍 Every transaction writes a better future
From NFTs to DeFi, every interaction leaves a positive mark by building a new digital economy and healing the planet.
A blockchain designed not just to grow, but to last.
MultiversX. Future-Proof by Design. $EGLD
@Davyegld@joewu_official There's big money in memes like $Doge, $Pepe & $Shib. It's arguably already sustainable for quite a long time and successful in maintaining speculative dynamics, despite 0 tech fundamentals.
And why do people seem to get tired of the speculative dynamics of $EGLD?
Explain this😁
@Davyegld@joewu_official There's good volume, good demand & enough supply. Not prone to destructive, volatile moves.
The value of other coins in the ecosystem is tied to the value of the L1 base coin.
As an analogy, no one wants to build a farm near a dry river & barren land. It has to be sustainable.
The Price Doesn’t Matter… Until It Does
How explosive growth happens fast — and why MultiversX is ready
🧠 Context
EGLD is down ~97% from ATH.
Many shout: “Dead coin! Scam! Irrelevant!”
But price ≠ value.
On-chain usage, infra quality, and readiness matter more.
Because when the market shifts — it moves in weeks, not years.
🔍 MultiversX : A Snapshot of the Network's Health
Despite the current price of $14.28 , MultiversX exhibits robust network activity:
Transactions :
+500 million transactions processed.
Validators :
More than 3,600 validators securing the network.SoFi
Transaction Cost: Approximately $0.002 per transaction, ensuring affordability.
These metrics underscore a thriving ecosystem, independent of short-term price movements.
⚡ Historical Price Explosions in Layer 1s
Let’s take a look at how violently fast other top L1s have exploded in previous cycles:
🚀 Solana (2021)
Grew from $20 → $220
10× gain in just 40 days
🔥 Avalanche (2021)
From $11 → $72
6.5× gain in under 45 days
🌪️ Fantom (2021)
From $0.40 → $3.50
8.75× gain in 60 days
💥 MATIC (2021)
From $0.03 → $2.40
90× gain in 100 days
🧩 What they had in common
Low price + low noise
Infrastructure mostly ready
Community underestimated
Then… liquidity + narrative collided
And the market moved.
🔍 What about MultiversX?
✅ Instant finality
✅ Sovereign Chains launching
✅ xPortal mass adoption tool
✅ Cross-shard parallelism (Supernova)
✅ Sub-$15 price zone
✅ DeFi
✅ Native asset (security first)
✅ Open-source
✅ Decentralized
✅ Made in USA
Ready infrastructure. Zero hype.
🎯 Key takeaway:
Crypto moves slow… until it doesn’t.
When the market wakes up, it doesn't care about past charts — it rewards readiness.
And MultiversX is technically and structurally ready.
Great update by @Nach_gz of the chart from @algerstmehn
If it was possible to add security to a chart as well you would see @MultiversX at the top for that as well
Crazy to think how undervalued $EGLD is
P.S. This is actual REAL TPS performed on mainnet and not a test
@Davyegld@joewu_official In my opinion, growth is growth, price is price. We might have solid arguments against this, but the fact is, memecoins and shitcoins proved otherwise.
Growth is just slightly affecting price, hype is the main factor for price appreciation.
@Davyegld@joewu_official On memecoins, price precedes growth. In fact, there's no such thing as growth.
Who is the head of marketing of Doge or Fartcoin? If we look at their coin's price alone, they must be doing a better job than Adam.
Wait, they don't have any🤔