@bobbykurlander@ProtonPrivacy While this is mostly true, there is a big difference requiring a process versus willingly submitting your data to an insecure archive.
@DrewSav@ECaliberSeven I thought he was being way too conservative, but then I realized he set a deadline of August 31. It looks like itโll be almost spot on
@DrewSav@JeffJacksonNC do you have a favorite Ninja Turtle to add to the spreadsheet? As a resident of North Carolina, this is an important question to me.
This paper gives a fancy name to a problem you can already feel in your bones
"The Tragedy of the Cognitive Commons." Checking AI output requires deep expertise. Deep expertise comes from doing grunt work for years. And grunt work is the first thing AI eats
So we're building systems that need expert supervision while dismantling the only known process for making experts
The paper calls the shared pool of human expertise the "cognitive commons." Every profession drinks from it. Nobody's refilling it.
By eliminating junior roles, each company is acting totally rationally, and the collective result: a profession that can't catch AI's mistakes anymore because it never learned to do the work in the first place
Who checks AI's homework in 15 years?