@JRHouston20 Not broadcast's fault that they waved the checkered with 95 seconds on the clock.
It was going to be close on going the extra lap or not. But ultimately, they waved it a lap early even for the shorter option.
@AllAsItSeems@iRacing Some people only read what they want to read. iRacing has always used this wording, and yet people constantly spread the idea that it means there will be real-time weather.
@iRacing To be clear, this is saying that the probabilities will be based on real-world weather data; not pulling real-time weather from that location, correct?
Just trying to cut off what I believe is a common misconception before it gains traction from this tweet.
@MattCurrin4@theqbschool Nope. Unbalanced lines are legal, and fairly common. You just need to have 7 on the LOS. The player on each end needs to be eligible, and the 5 in the middle are ineligible.
@MattCurrin4@theqbschool He is lined up as a tight end on this play... the 5 linemen are to his right. You can have an unbalanced line with 1 left and 3 right of the center.
@stareagle@CMUchips There's small discrepancies like this all the time. As long as ASRB looked at the ref, indicated he was on the line, and was reasonably close... he's on the line.
You can find dozens of things like this in every game where WRs line up vaguely on or off the line.
@LGlodek It is only an illegal formation and illegal man downfield if he is ineligible.
If he's eligible, he doesn't need to be covered by another receiver. He IS the receiver covering the line.
@BryanDFischer If he's eligible, then it's not an illegal formation.
7 on LOS, eligible (green) on each end, ineligible (red) between.
However, #70, who was announced as eligible, would need to be ineligible for it to be legal. So the ref simply announced the wrong lineman as eligible.
@ChrisVannini Uh, if he's eligible, that is a legal formation. 7 players on LOS, eligible on each end, with 5 ineligible between. It's a normal unbalanced line formation.
@70Inferno@A_S12@IndyCar@iRacing@SBJ When iRacing announced no more Indycar, the MSG deal hadn't happened just before that. That was just when iRacing's license expired.
Indy signed with MSG in summer of 21, a few months before the NASCAR game had even released.
Early 21 MSG was shady, but not a dumpster fire yet.
@straightail @J1_1nior@A_S12@IndyCar@iRacing@SBJ Not even. I think the majority of members pay for 1 or 2 years, which are under 10/month even if you're not taking advantage of any sale.
Also, Indycar isn't going to be exclusive to iRacing or anything anyway, so I don't understand the gripe.