Wikipedia has a rival now. (well, since 2025)
Grokipedia (xAI) writes and updates every article with AI, no human editors. Launched with 885k+ articles, crashed on day one from traffic.
Same question, totally different author behind the answer.
Have you tried it?
Most technical decisions aren’t actually technical. They’re political.
Migrating from AWS to GCP or swapping Microsoft for Google is rarely about "better vs. worse."
It’s usually driven by:
• A new CTO bringing their preferred playbook
• Consolidating internal power & budget
• Vendor leverage & board alignment
Engineers: If you want your technical proposals approved, stop pitching just tech specs.
Frame them around business alignment and executive optics.
The best tech decision is the one that actually gets implemented.
90% of biomedical papers now show signs of AI writing. AI is clearly reshaping research.
The key question: how do we harness it to catch errors while preserving human judgment?
That takes transparency and rigor.
AI: "I am going to redefine the future of human productivity."
Bitcoin: pumps overnight while everyone sleeps
AI: "Hey, wait... where did my compute budget go?"