Human beings living their lives and experiencing the world isn't some gross energy inefficiency it's the ENTIRE POINT OF EXISTENCE you creepy, antihuman weirdo.
He's not just defending AI energy use. He is smuggling in a whole anthropology where humans are basically inefficient meat computers that you have to pour food and years into before they become useful. And once you accept that, the next move is obvious. If people are just costly biological training runs, then burning mountains of electricity to build synthetic intelligence starts to feel not only equal, but superior, even if it negatively impacts actual humans.
That is the dystopian. It makes human development sound like a bug in the system, and it makes sacrificing human and creational flourishing for more computational power sound logical. To him, the grid gets strained, prices go up, ecosystems get hit, but hey, humans eat too, so what's the difference?
The difference is that humans aren't an inefficient line item. They're the point. If your worldview can look at a child growing into an adult and describe it as energy spent to train intelligence, you haven't said something profound. You've revealed a horrifically rotten worldview.
@ceciliaviajera@JanyRepublicana Que triste, recibiendo ese tipo de beneficio que ayuda a muchas personas que lamentablemente caen en la pobreza y ella en contra de todo eso
@USAmbCL@GabrielBoric Si fuera "nuestro" hemisferio deberían tratarnos como aliados y no como sus peones, los paises de América Latina son soberanos y merecen que se les respete