@BasileTerv987@MichaelArbel Training loss indicative of downstream performance? I'm sold!
Since PEIRA uses closed-form solves for P and Q, is there a practical ceiling for output dimension k?
@augustiner_h@visakanv@goblinodds Think it’s because AI dilutes costly signals
If you claim to find it repulsive then it increases the trustworthiness of your signals
@6ixpool@MattPirkowski I guess that would be Cover's theorem? From SVM lectures to motivate the kernel trick: nonlinearly projecting data to a higher dimension to render it linearly separable
We should use fancy words to articulate things precisely, for our audience's sake
@MattPirkowski > When you understand these systems as high dimensional holographic compressions
You'll have to clarify what you're talking about here precisely
https://t.co/ikRK7pU0I5
@EntropyChase@norpadon@aran_nayebi “PREDICTING the next token” belies the fact that the next token is estimated to be the best one, not necessarily the most likely one, and thus beyond iterated autocomplete
@AvivTamar1@ylecun@pulkitology Has Yann ever said it ISN’T a JEPA? It sounds like he agrees it is from this answer, but that preventing entropy collapse via SIGREG is the differentiator.
@lucasmaes_ What makes this different from LeJEPA? I can see that it is, just trying to pinpoint whether it’s one big thing I’m missing vs many improvements
Exciting work!!
@GregHBurnham Yes, Pro's solution gets a similar normalized cost vs Californication as mine does to Bare Necessities. But I got to choose what song I wanted to parody!
I was thoroughly impressed by simply including the script. I haven't found a pure-prompt that works half as well.
@GregHBurnham So "passing" solutions are automatically verifiable but "good" solutions beyond that are hard.
Also the model could trivially produce meter-adherent but meaningless lyrics!
@GregHBurnham This is to the tune of "Californication"
If you try and sing it out, you'll notice that it's not bad! But it's awkward - places low-info words like "a"/"the" at stressed beats