@Notidenttified جهاز الأمن وصلاح قوش نايمين نوم الناس اتحركت الف كيلومتر لغاية وصلت أمدرمان
ودا بوريك ضعف الجيش و مخابرته عشان كدة الاعتماد علي المليشيات دي شي أساسي عند الجيش
🚨🚨| BREAKING: The conflict in Sudan has reportedly claimed at least 150,000 lives over the past two years.
FairSquare is urging the UK to investigate possible sanctions against Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, owner of Manchester City over alleged UAE support for a paramilitary group accused of war crimes. The UAE denies the allegations.
{@TheAthleticFC}
Over the past two years, the latest conflict in Sudan is estimated to have claimed at least 150,000 lives.
Now, human rights organisation FairSquare has provided the latest calls for the British government’s Foreign Office to consider sanctions and investigate the role of Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al-Nahyan — owner of Manchester City and deputy prime minister of Abu Dhabi — in the UAE government's alleged support of a paramilitary group accused of committing war crimes in the country.
This follows on from former leader of the Conservative Party Iain Duncan Smith stating in parliament in January that Mansour was “possibly the most high-profile UAE investor in the UK economy” and arguing that the Foreign Office should undertake a “full assessment of whether representatives of the UAE Government may meet the criteria for sanctions”.
The UK government has already sanctioned several private individuals and organisations in connection to the atrocities taking place in Sudan, which UN officials have stated carry “hallmarks of genocide”.
The UAE strongly denies being a party to the conflict or supporting either side.
@jwhitey98 explains why there have been calls to investigate potential sanctions against Man City's owner and what the possible consequences would be.
🔗 https://t.co/eObOUNRBjz
It's now been three years since the RSF began a campaign of ethnic cleansing and genocide in Sudan. We need to save lives and pass the Stand Up for Sudan Act to cease all U.S. weapon sales to the United Arab Emirates. Shame on our country for enabling another genocide.
هنا حيث قاتلو المليشيا حتى نفاذ الزخائر
هنا استشهد الفريق جزم
هنا استشهد الاعلامى ادروب هنا فقدت نحلة دارفور هنا استبسال شجعان فى الدفاع عن كثير من المدنيين كانو فى الطرف الاخر يهربون من جحيم المليشيا
الفاشر حكاية صمود و دفاع حق رحمة الله على كل الشهداء الابرار
لا زال مليشيا الدعم السريع تتجمع من نواحى كردفان و الصحراء للهجوم على محلية الطينة يوم امس تعاملت مسيرات القوات المسلحة مع تجمعات وتحركات للمليشيا فى محيط مدينة الفاشر بين الكومة و الفاشر كما رصدت تحركات للمليشيا فى محيط محلية مليط
Well Well, the UK is a proper parliamentary democracy, where MPs are quite free to question and scrutinise the government whenever they choose. That’s simply how the system works, isn’t it? All this debate and scrutiny doesn’t imply support for any foreign regime; it simply means elected representatives doing their job. To criticise open debate in Parliament rather misses the point – that very openness is precisely what democracy looks like.
Claiming “London isn’t safe” is rather an exaggeration. It remains one of the world’s great global cities, with millions of people out and about every evening – heading to work, restaurants, theatres, concerts and the rest. Like any large metropolis, there are certainly areas with higher crime rates, but it’s hardly some lawless wilderness.
Besides, in open democracies such as the UK, safety statistics are publicly available and vigorously debated in the press. But In more tightly controlled states like the UAE, one doesn’t always enjoy the same degree of transparency when it comes to criticism or crime figures.
And comparing a vast, diverse capital of over nine million souls to a smaller, highly regulated state? Well, that’s hardly a like-for-like comparison, is it?