LUCH | ETHGas ⛽

6 months ago

Quest mode activated! ✅ Stacking beans and building alliances for Gassy Jack's beanstalk climb. Build a Gasless Future and unlock rewards together. LFGGasless! 🚀 https://t.co/TXorQbNQl2 https://t.co/TXorQbNQl2

6 months ago

Introducing the Open Gas Initiative by ETHGas — a path to a frictionless onchain experience. @Uniswap, @aave, @opensea… it's your time to step up and sponsor gas for users.⚡ Get started here: https://t.co/l8fsyW3kM4 https://t.co/3kxJhGfD5N

ETHGAS

@ETHGasOfficial

7 months ago

Introducing the Open Gas Initiative - a way for protocols to subsidize gas for users, zero-code, for a seamless, frictionless onchain experience. With OG cohort: @eigencloud, @ether_fi, @pendle_fi, @Velvet_Capital. 👇

661

897

112

6 months ago

Discovered my Gas ID via ETHGas - turning my gas spend into rewards 🫘 As a Kiddo Jack, I've spent 0.1662 ETH on gas but earned 50 Beans back. Get your Gas ID and Beans here: https://t.co/a13bYbd5PK

Degen hunts big fish. Polymarket found him ✦ @zscdao

8 months ago

@degrigod @monad @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade @zscdao bet no >4b

Who to follow

YaninaLuch retweeted

9 months ago

MEGA HYPE across the crypto community. Over 100K people already registered for the @megaeth sale. By Monday it’ll be around 120K+. The buzz makes sense: it’s the second sale on Sonar after the insane @Plasma case. Some are joining hoping for a base reward like last time, others are aping in blinded by the x4 premarket price calling it a “no brainer.” There’s definitely something here. But let’s keep our heads cool and add a few facts to the mix: • @monad case showed that investor profiles on Sonar are valued, so base rewards might come later from other projects. • @echodotxyz platform was recently acquired by @coinbase for $375M. This will be their first showcase case. • And again, the @HyperliquidX premarket is at 4.2B FDV. That’s x4.2 on any size. Of course, it won’t be that perfect. But I’m aping into this sale anyway. No point repeating details about how the sale or auction will run, that’s already been covered perfectly by @0xHeisenbruh

degrigod's tweet photo. MEGA HYPE across the crypto community. Over 100K people already registered for the @megaeth sale. By Monday it’ll be around 120K+.
The buzz makes sense: it’s the second sale on Sonar after the insane @Plasma case. Some are joining hoping for a base reward like last time, others are aping in blinded by the x4 premarket price calling it a “no brainer.”

There’s definitely something here. But let’s keep our heads cool and add a few facts to the mix:

• @monad case showed that investor profiles on Sonar are valued, so base rewards might come later from other projects.

• @echodotxyz platform was recently acquired by @coinbase for $375M. This will be their first showcase case.

• And again, the @HyperliquidX premarket is at 4.2B FDV. That’s x4.2 on any size.

Of course, it won’t be that perfect. But I’m aping into this sale anyway.

No point repeating details about how the sale or auction will run, that’s already been covered perfectly by @0xHeisenbruh

166

9 months ago

@cryptonastya0 I hope everything goes as planned.

9 months ago

@unohooooo 🙌

10 months ago

@unohooooo yo… finally a LP strat that don’t wreck ur BTC 😅 yield + fees = gg 🔥

YaninaLuch retweeted

10 months ago

🟠 @YieldBasis - a project that tackles the biggest pain of LPs on DEX: impermanent loss and the “√-effect.” Let’s break it down 👇 👉 Created by @newmichwill, founder of Curve Finance - one of the most impactful DeFi protocols.

degrigod's tweet photo. 🟠 @YieldBasis - a project that tackles the biggest pain of LPs on DEX: impermanent loss and the “√-effect.” Let’s break it down 👇

👉 Created by @newmichwill, founder of Curve Finance - one of the most impactful DeFi protocols. https://t.co/kOPp8Rs6Kp

154

10 months ago

Yap early, yap only, yap often. @KaitoAI is connecting AI, attention and capital with Yaps. Just claimed my social card and I'm accumulating Yap points in real-time. Claim yours 👉 https://t.co/HRpARVi5Pe

10 months ago

I'm taking a stand for privacy. Privacy is the missing key that will unlock new dimensions, expand opportunities, and finally bring the world onchain. View my @aztecnetwork privacy glyph & create your own: https://t.co/Ng7hbJ5k83

about 1 year ago

@unohooooo @LineaBuild Absolutely agree 💯

YaninaLuch retweeted

about 1 year ago

🧩 A Fair Way to Distribute the @LineaBuild Airdrop — Without the Drama. There’s a lot of noise right now about a supposed data leak from #Linea. And yes, real announcements often follow such leaks. Against this backdrop, I want to summarize our earlier interactions with the Linea team. I (and not only I) proposed to @Alain_Ncls a safe and fair way to distribute the airdrop to community members affected by the mass @AdsPowerBrowser hack. The reply was: “I’m not trying to dismiss every idea, but I just feel like there isn’t a truly solid solution at the moment.” That sounded like a polite rejection of all proposals. It felt like the goal wasn’t to find a solution, but to simulate a dialogue. I then reposted my proposal on the official #Linea forum, hoping to be heard. Instead, I was met with complete silence from the team. There was no dialogue — just dozens of personal attacks and insults from self-proclaimed “community members.” It felt like I was not on the forum of a tech project, but in a loud alley fight, where people just shout over each other and throw mud. The moderator closed the thread citing “mutual aggression,” even though I never insulted anyone personally — unlike the dozens of toxic replies I received. And yet, my post still ranks as one of the top 2 most viewed and active threads in the last 4 months. But the team didn’t seem to @KiloEx_perp, @hyperlane, @zora,care. Since then, several projects have already launched their tokens — @KiloEx_perp, @hyperlane, @zora, and others. Not a single one of them blacklisted AdsPower-compromised wallets as Sybils. On every one of those platforms, tokens could be claimed safely at TGE and moved to a clean wallet without complex processes. @hyperlane even let users pre-select the wallet address for the claim. That’s exactly what I did — chose a secure wallet and received the tokens with no issues. Simple and fair. 🔁 I’m once again reaching out to the @LineaBuild team: Do the right thing. You have no evidence that the wallets affected by the AdsPower hack were Sybils. They were flagged only because of pressure from an aggressive part of the forum, whose accusations are driven by emotion and greed, not facts — just trying to maximize their own rewards. I still follow new threads on the forum and see these people continuing their activity in the same way. They don’t care who was actually affected — they’re ready to label anyone as a Sybil. But you did consider solutions for safely distributing tokens to these compromised wallets. That means you recognize that these users deserve their reward. That matters. So once again, I urge you: Don’t abandon the part of your community that got hurt. Show that #Linea is a project that values those who helped it grow. People who invested their time, effort, and money. Fair distribution is not hard. Projects like @KiloEx_perp, @hyperlane, @zora already proved that. All it takes is a willingness to be honest and open. @nkeywal @ethereumJoseph @DeclanFox14 @Alain_Ncls @bigironchris

degrigod's tweet photo. 🧩 A Fair Way to Distribute the @LineaBuild Airdrop — Without the Drama.

There’s a lot of noise right now about a supposed data leak from #Linea. And yes, real announcements often follow such leaks.
Against this backdrop, I want to summarize our earlier interactions with the Linea team.

I (and not only I) proposed to @Alain_Ncls a safe and fair way to distribute the airdrop to community members affected by the mass @AdsPowerBrowser hack.
The reply was: “I’m not trying to dismiss every idea, but I just feel like there isn’t a truly solid solution at the moment.”

That sounded like a polite rejection of all proposals. It felt like the goal wasn’t to find a solution, but to simulate a dialogue.

I then reposted my proposal on the official #Linea forum, hoping to be heard.
Instead, I was met with complete silence from the team.
There was no dialogue — just dozens of personal attacks and insults from self-proclaimed “community members.”

It felt like I was not on the forum of a tech project, but in a loud alley fight, where people just shout over each other and throw mud.

The moderator closed the thread citing “mutual aggression,” even though I never insulted anyone personally — unlike the dozens of toxic replies I received.
And yet, my post still ranks as one of the top 2 most viewed and active threads in the last 4 months.
But the team didn’t seem to @KiloEx_perp, @hyperlane, @zora,care.

Since then, several projects have already launched their tokens — @KiloEx_perp, @hyperlane, @zora, and others.
Not a single one of them blacklisted AdsPower-compromised wallets as Sybils.
On every one of those platforms, tokens could be claimed safely at TGE and moved to a clean wallet without complex processes.

@hyperlane even let users pre-select the wallet address for the claim.
That’s exactly what I did — chose a secure wallet and received the tokens with no issues.
Simple and fair.

🔁 I’m once again reaching out to the @LineaBuild team:
Do the right thing.

You have no evidence that the wallets affected by the AdsPower hack were Sybils.
They were flagged only because of pressure from an aggressive part of the forum, whose accusations are driven by emotion and greed, not facts — just trying to maximize their own rewards.

I still follow new threads on the forum and see these people continuing their activity in the same way.
They don’t care who was actually affected — they’re ready to label anyone as a Sybil.

But you did consider solutions for safely distributing tokens to these compromised wallets.
That means you recognize that these users deserve their reward.
That matters.

So once again, I urge you:
Don’t abandon the part of your community that got hurt.
Show that #Linea is a project that values those who helped it grow.
People who invested their time, effort, and money.

Fair distribution is not hard.
Projects like @KiloEx_perp, @hyperlane, @zora already proved that.
All it takes is a willingness to be honest and open.

@nkeywal
@ethereumJoseph
@DeclanFox14
@Alain_Ncls
@bigironchris

over 1 year ago

@unohooooo @Alain_Ncls @LineaBuild @AdsPowerBrowser YES YES YES!!! I’ve been hit hard by the hack, but I’m not losing hope! I’m ready to go through any verification to get my money back. This is my chance to get what belongs to me!!!

YaninaLuch retweeted

over 1 year ago

How to restore justice for the affected @LineaBuild users after the AdsPower hack? Recently, many users faced a serious issue: their wallets were blocklisted by @LineaBuild after the @AdsPowerBrowser hack. This decision deprives them of their well-deserved rewards, even though they had previously successfully passed the Proof of Humanity (PoH) verification and a detailed sybil activity analysis conducted by @nansen_ai. The inclusion of these wallets in the blocklist, as I assume, may be due to concerns that malicious actors gained access to them and could steal future tokens. However, the #Linea team has not provided clear explanations on this matter, aside from a few official messages in Discord (see below), which convey a different message. They claim that the addresses compromised through the @adspowercn hack were blocked due to sybil activity. This statement is unfair and inaccurate. The statement that these addresses were added to the blocklist due to their connection with a large number of compromised accounts creates the impression that the team does not draw a clear distinction between sybil activity and the consequences of compromise. This leads to legitimate users being under suspicion and being perceived as fraudsters. It is clear that during the hack on January 24-25, the hacker linked all the affected wallets with their own, creating an artificial interwoven network of addresses. These connections were not made by the users’ will, but were a result of the compromise of their wallets by the malicious actor. After reviewing the appeals, an additional 13,586 addresses were added to the blocklist, which roughly corresponds to the number of addresses affected by the hacker attack on the #Linea network. This suggests that addresses were added to the blocklist en masse without thorough analysis. Moreover, the lack of an appeal process is a serious concern. Users flagged by #Nansen for signs of sybil activity were given a chance to dispute the decision through appeals. However, honest users affected by the Ads Power hack were not even given such an opportunity. In this situation, it would be extremely unfair to leave things as they are for the honest members of the Linea community. I have studied this issue and propose a solution that would restore the right to rewards for the rightful wallet owners while preventing opportunities for fraudsters. 🔹Option 1: Reverification via PoH 1️⃣ Reverification Process • Access to the verification page is granted only to whitelisted users affected by the Ads Power breach. • They will be able to reverify their PoH using the same social networks as before. For example: • Twitter — via @TrustaLabs • Gmail — via @openid_3 • #Gitcoin Passport (now @HumnPassport) After successful verification, a window will appear where users can delegate the airdrop to a new address, with no option for re-linking the address. 2️⃣ Access Restriction • Reverification is only available to users from the blocklist who have no signs of sybil activity but were affected by the breach. • This will restore airdrop access to legitimate users while preventing fraudsters from claiming rewards. 🔹Option 2: Recovery via Withdrawal History 1️⃣ Status Differentiation on the Proof of Humanity (PoH) Page 🟢 Green Status — Wallets that were not compromised remain unchanged. 🟡 Yellow Status — Wallets drained via AdsPower get an option for additional verification and can specify a new address for the airdrop. 2️⃣ Verification and New Address Linking • The user enters a wallet address where they withdrew funds before 2025 (typically an exchange address). • If the address is verified, the wallet receives Yellow Status and access to recovery. ❌ The system rejects: • Addresses with withdrawals only in 2025. • Addresses linked to fraudsters. • New wallets with no withdrawal history. 3️⃣ Claiming and Distribution 🟢 Green Status wallets — Manual claiming from 12:00. 🟡 Yellow Status wallets — Automatic airdrop to the verified exchange address (e.g., starting at 17:00). Additional Security Measures If stronger protection against bypassing is needed, an extra measure can be added: ⏳ Limited time window for re-verification. Minimal Infrastructure Changes The proposed solution seamlessly integrates into the existing system without requiring complex technical modifications. This enables a quick implementation of protective measures without significant resource expenditure. I invite the Linea team and Nansen analysts to join the discussion. I want to hear your perspectives and work together to find a solution that ensures the recovery process is fair, secure, and transparent. Many affected users, including myself, actively participated in the Infura testnet, Voyage, and were among the first to execute transactions on mainnet. We engaged in quests, contributing to Linea growth and success. We are loyal supporters who do not deserve to be left behind. It is crucial that those who suffered from the hack receive their rightful rewards. We didn’t just believe in something—we believed in Linea. I hope Linea will take a fair and balanced approach to resolve this issue. @nkeywal @ethereumJoseph @DeclanFox14 @Alain_Ncls @bigironchris

degrigod's tweet photo. How to restore justice for the affected @LineaBuild users after the AdsPower hack?

Recently, many users faced a serious issue: their wallets were blocklisted by @LineaBuild after the @AdsPowerBrowser hack. This decision deprives them of their well-deserved rewards, even though they had previously successfully passed the Proof of Humanity (PoH) verification and a detailed sybil activity analysis conducted by @nansen_ai.

The inclusion of these wallets in the blocklist, as I assume, may be due to concerns that malicious actors gained access to them and could steal future tokens. However, the #Linea team has not provided clear explanations on this matter, aside from a few official messages in Discord (see below), which convey a different message. They claim that the addresses compromised through the @adspowercn hack were blocked due to sybil activity. This statement is unfair and inaccurate.

The statement that these addresses were added to the blocklist due to their connection with a large number of compromised accounts creates the impression that the team does not draw a clear distinction between sybil activity and the consequences of compromise. This leads to legitimate users being under suspicion and being perceived as fraudsters.

It is clear that during the hack on January 24-25, the hacker linked all the affected wallets with their own, creating an artificial interwoven network of addresses. These connections were not made by the users’ will, but were a result of the compromise of their wallets by the malicious actor.

After reviewing the appeals, an additional 13,586 addresses were added to the blocklist, which roughly corresponds to the number of addresses affected by the hacker attack on the #Linea network. This suggests that addresses were added to the blocklist en masse without thorough analysis.

Moreover, the lack of an appeal process is a serious concern. Users flagged by #Nansen for signs of sybil activity were given a chance to dispute the decision through appeals. However, honest users affected by the Ads Power hack were not even given such an opportunity.

In this situation, it would be extremely unfair to leave things as they are for the honest members of the Linea community. I have studied this issue and propose a solution that would restore the right to rewards for the rightful wallet owners while preventing opportunities for fraudsters.

🔹Option 1: Reverification via PoH

1️⃣ Reverification Process

• Access to the verification page is granted only to whitelisted users affected by the Ads Power breach.

• They will be able to reverify their PoH using the same social networks as before.

For example:

• Twitter — via @TrustaLabs

• Gmail — via @openid_3

• #Gitcoin Passport (now @HumnPassport)

After successful verification, a window will appear where users can delegate the airdrop to a new address, with no option for re-linking the address.

2️⃣ Access Restriction

• Reverification is only available to users from the blocklist who have no signs of sybil activity but were affected by the breach.

• This will restore airdrop access to legitimate users while preventing fraudsters from claiming rewards.

🔹Option 2: Recovery via Withdrawal History

1️⃣ Status Differentiation on the Proof of Humanity (PoH) Page

🟢 Green Status — Wallets that were not compromised remain unchanged.

🟡 Yellow Status — Wallets drained via AdsPower get an option for additional verification and can specify a new address for the airdrop.

2️⃣ Verification and New Address Linking

• The user enters a wallet address where they withdrew funds before 2025 (typically an exchange address).

• If the address is verified, the wallet receives Yellow Status and access to recovery.

❌ The system rejects:

• Addresses with withdrawals only in 2025.
• Addresses linked to fraudsters.
• New wallets with no withdrawal history.

3️⃣ Claiming and Distribution

🟢 Green Status wallets — Manual claiming from 12:00.

🟡 Yellow Status wallets — Automatic airdrop to the verified exchange address (e.g., starting at 17:00).

Additional Security Measures
If stronger protection against bypassing is needed, an extra measure can be added:

⏳ Limited time window for re-verification.

Minimal Infrastructure Changes
The proposed solution seamlessly integrates into the existing system without requiring complex technical modifications. This enables a quick implementation of protective measures without significant resource expenditure.

I invite the Linea team and Nansen analysts to join the discussion. I want to hear your perspectives and work together to find a solution that ensures the recovery process is fair, secure, and transparent.

Many affected users, including myself, actively participated in the Infura testnet, Voyage, and were among the first to execute transactions on mainnet. We engaged in quests, contributing to Linea growth and success. We are loyal supporters who do not deserve to be left behind.

It is crucial that those who suffered from the hack receive their rightful rewards. We didn’t just believe in something—we believed in Linea. I hope Linea will take a fair and balanced approach to resolve this issue.

@nkeywal @ethereumJoseph @DeclanFox14 @Alain_Ncls @bigironchris

250

164

over 1 year ago

@cryptonastya0 i am waiting this moment!!!