@voldain0503 In this case, many people feel distrust towards the company, and there's nothing strange about them expressing their feelings and resentment on social media. The service provider is unconditionally at fault in this incident, and we are in a position to criticize them.
@peterlee12180@FqZoV662XIuqf9K@sunsonking@grok Hey, back when Japan, China, and South Korea were trying to sign an agreement, Japanese officials started dying one after another, and people from Hong Kong started coming ashore on the Senkaku Islands. What's going on? 🥺
@aniki_0519 No, from what I can see, it all started when a smartphone user responded to the question of the compensation and reimbursement offered by the management was sufficient by saying that compensation was enough and that everything was resolved. Please stop belittling the victims.
@JohnSmithrfpru Hey, I dislike anti-Japanese Chinese people (or rather, the Chinese Communist Party), but I welcome people like you. Of course, I know there are good Chinese people, and I support them 💪
@g_a_right_mania The specific companies that should be presented are not us, but all the companies associated with the service provider that is at fault. Why should we be the ones making these suggestions?
When a company loses credibility, we have the right to criticize it.
@stardust_dustbx This is a perfectly plausible scenario. When the credibility of all companies associated with a service provider plummets, even those who are not victims have the right to criticize it, and I don't understand why anyone would complain about it.
@chee_hakari_ni Reactions to a company's downfall vary from person to person, and we shouldn't criticize them. They are victims, and where they perceive a loss of trust in the company is different for each individual.
@re_nw0 We have the right to criticize and hold a company accountable when its reputation is damaged. And this is social media, a place to vent those inner frustrations. You have no right to comment on it.
@srn_art Retiring is the same declaration of intent as when you started. We have the right to criticize a company's loss of credibility, and no one has the right to stop us from doing so. This person's wording may be poor (the translation is not good), but criticism is necessary.
@king_octpus All companies associated with the service provider are responsible for these kinds of problems, and we have the right to criticize them. Is anyone defending GMOs in the recent Japanese GMO scandal? Is anyone defending Times Car in the Times Car scandal?
@teio420401 It's only natural that trust in a company would be lost when incidents like this occur, and this is similar to the GMO issue currently causing a stir in Japan.