@RebelsVaught If you mean taking the offensive staff while also trying to stay and coach, then yes, but it semantics. If he had just left and still taken his guys would anyone at Ole Miss feel differently.
@BrennonChapman No, you're actually missing the point. The only reason he is eligible is that he went to fight in court. I think the LSU argument is that what is the difference? The NCAA said all these players are not eligible and yet they are playing in every other case.
@TheStevenWillis But it's not players that went pro. It's players that exhausted eligibility with 4 years that had no choice but to go and get cut by an NFL team in mini/training camp. If they had passed the rule in Nov. and not June none of these players would have dipped a toe in the NFL
@Clemson_Addict Totally different bc that player made the choice. This would be more like after the class of 2026 graduates, a kid tries to walk on at a school then gets cut and finds out there is now a 5th yr of high school he can legally play so he goes back to high school.
@BreidenFehoko These kids were already cut. It not like players are leaving 53 man rosters and practice squads to go back to college and we're are talking about guys that had they known they could get another year wouldn't have declared for the draft in the first place
@lilwsynekiffin@EdLawDude How is that different to the LSU kids? At the end of last season of they'd had eligibility they'd be at LSU. The Notre Dame kid maybe not but that's more about ND admissions than LSU
@footballlady24 Had they known they had a fifth year of eligibility they never would have declared for the draft bc they knew they were unlikely to make a team. That's literally the point of the lawsuit against the NCAA. This is on the NCAA for not passing this in November.