![YERIN_OFFICIAL_'s tweet photo. [📸]
2026 YERIN FAN CONCERT : ‘STAR BLOOM’
우린이라는 밤하늘에☔
눈부시게 피어난 별 예린🌟
#예린 #YERIN
#YERIN_STARBLOOM https://t.co/QYvBh0mvUc](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HP2HNbza0AAsi2C.jpg)
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9EzbsAA8MMT.jpg)
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9DgbsAAoqg1.jpg)
Olivia
Online
5
@yeojachingufr
A buddy in a billion
France
Joined May 2017
509 Following
316 Followers
3K Posts
I did big-bang concert tonight. I hope someday I will be able to have a viviz/yuju/yerin or gfriend concert.
한화이글스 유튜브에 리겜으로 유주 나옴 아 웃겨
pretty umji sighting
Zara Larsson is surprised by the number of people getting lifted up during “Midnight Sun” at Pukkelpop.
@gfriendtwiIight Congrats buddy, wishing you the best for what comes next !
you think you’re tough i have followed my ult to her fourth new company
![YERIN_OFFICIAL_'s tweet photo. [📸]
2026 YERIN FAN CONCERT : ‘STAR BLOOM’
우린이라는 밤하늘에☔
눈부시게 피어난 별 예린🌟
#예린 #YERIN
#YERIN_STARBLOOM https://t.co/QYvBh0mvUc](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HP2HNb4bQAAgCuA.jpg)
#YERIN has sold 60,000 copies on Hanteo with all her albums.
Y’a
[NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGYC7Da8AAyQ4c.png)
생일뿐만 아니라 너의 모든 날이 행복하고 건강하길 바라며.
#6월의_적토마_신비생일
#AHipnoticPerformerSinB
#VIVIZ #비비지 #ビビジ #신비 #SINB #シンビ
#Yerin returns with her 4th mini-album 'REACH YOU'
https://t.co/khWJWzhaik
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
长枪完整版主页 qq
Seen from Korea
Jero
Seen from Australia
Zehra
Seen from Turkey
Sσundѕ Líkє Stєєl 
Seen from Vietnam
wifescandal
Seen from Malaysia
pd
Seen from United States
ActionforAlzheimers
Seen from United States
Sou Ssouu
Seen from Pakistan
Dark Nights 🌑🥷🦹
Seen from Thailand
Zebani
Seen from Turkey
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.4M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.9M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.3M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.1M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers