Communism is mostly a social/economic ideology. But Nazism is a strictly racial/nationalistic ideology. In that sense, losing a war, a violent struggle and being conquered by the people you deem inferior/subhuman does discredit Nazism ideologically, pretty hard too.
The "communists" of this website will listen to Donald Trump instead of every important Communist in history.
They will concede that patriotism means loving the pedophile regime in charge, instead of loving your people and opposing your government when it deserves it.
“Struggle is daily action against ourselves and against the enemy.”
“There is a preconception held by many people, even on the left, that imperialism made us enter history at the moment when it began its adventure in our countries.”
―Amilcar Cabral―
#CaboVerde#ArtsandCulture
Once a death cult always a death cult.
Tibetan culture under Dalai lama:
Paintings made from the skin of a 16 year old girl, and drums made from skulls of slaves.
Una campesina condenada a morir de hambre y sed por la monarquía feudal budista, intenta desesperadamente forzar la cerradura de la caja en la que la habían encerrado en mitad del campo al sol.
Mongolia, 4 julio de 1913.
En 1921, el Ejército Rojo junto al Partido Revolucionario del Pueblo de Mongolia, liberó el pais aplastando a las tropas zaristas y a la dinastia Qing, aboliendo estas torturas feudales de los amos budistas (puro amor y paz), expropiando las tierras a la nobleza y el clero, entregándosela a los campesinos esclavos de estos caciques.
When China builds infrastructure in Africa, Western governments call it a "debt trap."
When the IMF lent money to African governments under structural adjustment conditions that required selling off public utilities, cutting healthcare spending, and opening markets to foreign competition that destroyed domestic industry?
That was called "development assistance."
The "debt trap" accusation is often exaggerated and selectively applied. Chinese lending, like all international financing, should be examined case by case, and the terms of individual projects should remain open to scrutiny. That is a fair conversation to have.
But that conversation cannot be had honestly without acknowledging that the West has been running debt-based leverage over developing nations for roughly eighty years, through institutions it controls, using conditions it designed, producing outcomes that consistently benefited Western capital while leaving the borrowing nations more structurally dependent than before they borrowed.
The sudden Western concern about African sovereignty when Chinese money enters the picture is not concern for African sovereignty.
African sovereignty has never been a Western priority.
The concern is about competition.
About someone else getting access to the resources and the relationships and the political leverage that Western institutions have treated as their exclusive inheritance since decolonization produced independent governments that still needed external capital.
Concern for Africa.
From the people who designed structural adjustment.
The audacity of it should be theatrical. Instead it is just policy.
Croatia were given a grand total of 18 mins to score a goal yesterday and today the refree didn't even let Cape Verde take the last throw so close to goal
DISGRACEFUL
Everybody is talking about whether the Croatia player touched the ball but nobody is talking about why over 13 minutes were played when only 10 minutes were added on!