I TOLD MY GROK BOT TO STOP AT 10X. IT SENT ME "GOAL REACHED: 15X, AGENTS KEEP RUNNING" AND ENDED AT 17.26X. $200 → $3,452
everyone says the hard part of memecoins isn't buying, it's knowing when to stop
so i gave the bot a goal. $200, 10x, then done
it went past it
grok runs as a relay of 5 agents, each one hands the trade to the next:
→ SCOUT finds new solana pairs and flags when a KOL just aped. 23,616 scanned
→ ANALYST checks for rugs, bundles and dev wallets. 5 checks, or it dies
→ SNIPER buys. fills in 0.4 seconds
→ RISK trails the stop as soon as it's green
→ BANKER sells and banks it
how the goal fell, by the session clock:
→ 0:03 MEW +40%, banked $36. $236
→ 0:11 POPCAT stopped at -7%. -$12
→ 0:19 MEW again +36%, +$93. $668
→ 0:27 FARTCOIN +37%, +$151. $1,051, past 5x
→ 0:35 MEW a third time, +$220. $1,888
→ 0:42 FARTCOIN again +37%, +$435. 10x gone
then the notification: "goal reached: 15x. $200 → $3,000. agents keep running"
and they did. 0:44 Ban +29%, +$399 banked. 17.26x
22 trades. 19 wins, 3 losses. 86%. the only red trade on screen was -$12
it kept going back to the same coins. MEW 3 times, FARTCOIN twice. every trip bigger because the stack behind it was bigger
$200 → $363 → $1,051 → $3,057 → $3,452
i set a goal. grok treated it as a checkpoint and kept walking
bookmark it before you tell your bot to stop at 10x
https://t.co/UxTIw8jFzb On Nov. 13, we’ll co-present the 10th Nevada Youth Homelessness Summit to strategize solutions that will become Nevada’s first standalone plan to address this critical issue. Watch to learn about the Summit and register at https://t.co/YtEiLwmZDl.
HOLY SH*T:ONE NUMBER CHANGED. MY SPIDER FIXED 5 SECTIONS BY ITSELF
48 sources in, 9 sections out, 0 old numbers left
the whole job starts from one folder. here is the loop:
→ reads 48 sources: filings, 12 customer calls, 3 rival sites
→ writes 9 sections: 1 summary, 3 rival pages, 5 charts
→ q3 revenue changes from $4.1M to $4.6M
→ finds the old $4.1M in 5 sections and fixes each one
→ checks every claim against facts.md
→ drops source 22, it says 19k users, facts.md says 21k
→ exports 9 of 9 approved
source 22 looked fine and was wrong by 2k users. remember that part
most people show you the writing. nobody shows you the part where it hunts the old number
no new tool. one facts.md and a spider that checks everything against it
this is a visual of the loop, the numbers are demo data
what should it check next: dates, links or quotes?
i test things like this on myself and share the results. follow @Kaggii_ if you want to see what's next
this is pure f*cking insane
Anthropic just had Claude design quantum circuits from plain text, and they outperform the best published papers by an order of magnitude:
Quantum computing has hit the exact same wall for years: human-designed circuits were bloated and collapsed under hardware noise.
Claude was given plain-language instructions, and the model optimized logic that physicists failed to assemble for decades.
TRANSLATE - turns plain-language algorithm descriptions into an initial quantum gate graph
PRUNE - strips redundant Toffoli gates that researchers left behind by habit
ROUTE - recalculates qubit entanglement paths against real physical chip constraints
SHRINK - cuts circuit depth by an order of magnitude before quantum states decohere
The core bottleneck in quantum computing was never just hardware. It was that circuits demanded far more physical resources than modern qubits could sustain without error.
Claude didn't copy physics textbooks. It treated circuit topology as a pure constraint-satisfaction problem and stripped away layers of redundant operations.
Instead of waiting a decade for fault-tolerant hardware, models are simply eliminating the bloat from the math.
This pulls complex molecular simulations and materials science years closer without needing a million physical qubits first.
The full optimization breakdown and benchmark paper are laid out below.