@fikocian This is not my area of expertise, but ChatGPT says: ozone monitoring, pollution detection, ocean surface monitoring, solar radiation monitoring and ecological impacts.
All seems more research than commercial applications.
@fikocian It's funny because when I first got into the industry 9 years ago everyone (Planet, Spire, et al) was selling data because nobody makes money on selling satellites.
And so the cycle turns.
@lizvstein@shantirrao@JeffCrusey@fikocian@lars_0 That's based on two false assumptions:
1. You sell chips - Instead you can use them as enabler in a much higher value system.
2. Development costs are high - Instead the software is now free and you can manufacture your own chips for as little as $150.
The world is changing.
@frazoman@profcbooth NVIDIA mkt cap = 2.2T$
Apple mkt cap = 2.8T$
Telsa mkt cap = 0.6T$
EEE is the backbone of the most valuable companies in the world.
I can guarantee you that the engineers pushing these companies forward have degrees.
Not sure how you could justify your original statement?
@profcbooth I seriously considered doing a PhD after graduating at Strathclyde EEE but all the research topics seemed too far removed from industrial applications. Also the options were very poorly advertised, it basically came down to which profs you knew personally.
Yet there are opportunities
- historic government semiconductor funding
- growing open-source silicon movement
- modern software that must eat the archaic semiconductor tools.
@Troy_McCann I don't know, I appreciate the beauty of advanced technology more than the average Joe.
But art is something else, it's about using a medium to communicate. It's why a child's painting can be art even if it's not technically accomplished.
Tech has beauty, but it's not art