Darío Tello Medina

Lector, escribidor,corrector de textos, librepensador, aficionado a la Geopolítica de Maracaibo, Venezuela.

[Darío Tello Medina @yukeks]

El espejo de Jorge Luis #Borges
#Lecturaenvozalta #Argentina #Latinoamerica #Literatura #Poesia
https://t.co/PkufPFOx8w

[محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf @mb_ghalibaf]

America falsely claims our unfrozen assets will buy their agriculture. Interesting. The only crop we're harvesting is what you planted: decades of mistrust. It's organic, abundant, and homegrown. But apparently the US only exports GMO soybeans, broken promises and trash talks.

[Seyed Abbas Araghchi @araghchi]

This is not a rant by a random genocidal lunatic. It's a public post by the national security minister of the Israeli regime.

The genocidal death cult headquartered in Tel Aviv is a threat to all of humanity. It threatens all humans. Its only interest is permanent war.

[Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen]

The official 14-point Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the US and Iran:

1 — The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran and their allies in the current war are signing this MOU to declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon and other provisions of this paragraph.

2 — The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.

3 — The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in maximum 60 days, extendable with mutual consent.

4 — Immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.

5 — Upon the signing of this MOU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge, for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles, and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialog with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.

6 — The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required licenses, waivers and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America.

7 — The United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed upon schedule as part of the final deal. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions termination issue above mentioned, and expressed their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.

8 — The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in paragraph seven, with the minimum methodology to be down blended on site under the supervision of the IAEA. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear needs, based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon in the final deal. The final deal will confirm the provisions of this paragraph. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran acknowledge the critical importance of the nuclear issues above mentioned. They express their intention to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.

9 — Pending the final deal, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree to maintain the status quo. The Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region.

10 — The United States of America undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MOU and until the termination of sanctions, US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.

11 — The United States of America undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the implementation of this MOU. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during negotiations. Such funds, whether retained in the original account or transferred, shall be made fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America undertakes to issue all necessary licenses and authorizations accordingly.

12 — The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree that an executive mechanism will be established to monitor the successful implementation of this MOU and the future compliance of the final deal.

13 — After signing this MOU, and subject to the beginning of the implementation of paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10 and 11 of this MOU, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal exclusively on the other paragraphs.

14 — The final deal will be endorsed by a binding UNSC resolution.

[¡Ahí les va! @ahilesvainfo]

Trump está tratando de presentar el acuerdo entre EE.UU. e Irán como una gran victoria de Washington, pero basta con echarle una lectura objetiva al documento para darse cuenta de que la realidad es muy distinta… 😬

[Pepe Escobar @RealPepeEscobar]

Our latest breaking news on Transition Protocol.

And it's another EXCLUSIVE.

The fact there may not be a signing ceremony in Geneva - Trump signed the MoU in Versailles - CONFIRMS our source detailing a Mossad plot to kill an Iranian negotiator.

https://t.co/JJnakwrrwT

[Darío Tello Medina @yukeks]

#NelBonilla La planificación del imperio

https://t.co/vHiIGJX3kv

[محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf @mb_ghalibaf]

تجاوز صهیونیست‌ها به ضاحیه باردیگر نشان داد آمریکا یا اراده‌ای برای اجرای تعهدات خود ندارد یا توان آن را. با چراغ سبز نشان دادن به رژیم نمی‌توانید امتیاز بگیرید. بازی پلیس بد و پلیس خوب قدیمی شده است.
اگر اراده و توان اجرای تعهدات خود را ندارید، سخن گفتن از ادامه مسیر ممکن نیست.

[Alfredo Jalife-Rahme @AlfredoJalife]

🇮🇷 Irán consulta con Rusia y China sobre el memorando de entendimiento con EEUU

🔈 Kazem Qaribabadi, viceministro iraní para Asuntos Jurídicos e Internacionales, se ha reunido hoy sábado con los embajadores de Rusia y China para abordar los últimos acontecimientos en cuanto al memorando de entendimiento de 14 puntos que pondría fin a la guerra de agresión impuesta estadounidense-israelí en todos los frentes.

[محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf @mb_ghalibaf]

یکسال از آغاز اولین دور از حملات جنایتکارانهٔ رژیم اسراییل و آمریکا به خانهٔ ابدی ما ایران می‌گذرد؛ کودکان بی‌گناه را به قتل رساندند و از هیچ جنایت و قساوتی پرهیز نکردند.

به تأسی از شهدای قهرمان و مظلوم جنگ ۱۲ روزه، تا پای جان برای سربلندی و پیروزی نهایی ایران عزیز ایستاده‌ایم.

[محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf @mb_ghalibaf]

Commitments made must be commitments kept. No ifs, no buts, no excuses. For the close deal ahead, there is no other way.
You reap what you sow.

[¡Ahí les va! @ahilesvainfo]

Pocas veces hay algo que agradecer a Donald Trump y Marco Rubio. Bueno, pocas, no: ninguna, en realidad 😬

Digamos entonces mejor que se agradece cuando se ponen en modo ‘confesiones involuntarias’ 😅

[محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf @mb_ghalibaf]

۱/ نه به آتش‌بس پایبندند نه به گفتگو باور دارند، و با محاصرهٔ دریایی و نقض توافقات دربارهٔ لبنان نشان دادند که فقط زبان قدرت می‌فهمند.

[Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen]

There is a strange development in which academics of international politics are expected to publicly condemn adversarial countries before they are allowed to participate in public discourse. The complexity of international politics is reduced to a moral question of good versus evil, and academics must make moral declarations before even discussing facts, history, strategy, and interpretations. Academics should explain why states behave as they do; they are not moral validators.

What value does it bring to an analysis if the analyst "condemns" one side? After Russia invaded Ukraine, the former Norwegian foreign minister actually argued that "this is not the time to understand, but to condemn". This ridiculous position is pushed on academics. However, understanding is not endorsement, explanation is not advocacy, and ignorance is not strength. I argue it is in Russia's security interest to push NATO away from its borders, it is in Iran's interest to control the Strait of Hormuz, and it is in China's interest to create a new international economic architecture. This is not advocacy, nor is it a normative position about how the world should work; rather, it is a recognition of how the world actually works.

An academic should examine interests, capabilities, and strategic calculations that produce such policies—not participate in ritualised declarations of virtue that contribute absolutely nothing. Furthermore, moralism and condemnation often lead to a lack of understanding and increased conflict. When the conclusion is always that the good guys are confronting the bad guys, then the solution is always "peace through strength", "weapons are the path to peace", and defeating the latest reincarnation of Hitler. If you want war, condemn the other side as pure evil. If you want peace, the first step is to understand the other side.

[Pepe Escobar @RealPepeEscobar]

HOW THE AXIS OF RESISTANCE RESISTS - IN 10 SECONDS

Iran ditches the already comatose "ceasefire" if the death cult in West Asia bombs Dahiyeh, the southern Beirut suburb.

Death cult and Barbaria have backed down. For now.

[Alfredo Jalife-Rahme @AlfredoJalife]

Análisis 📝Bajo la lupa 🔍
Por qué Irán gana su “guerra asimétrica” frente a dos potencias nucleares superiores EU/Israel, según Arreguin-Toft
https://t.co/1Cumml46nR

[Kim Dotcom @KimDotcom]

Netanyahu is Trump.
Thiel is JD Vance.
Ellison is Rubio.
Israel is USA.

America is f*cked

[محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf @mb_ghalibaf]

۱-ما امتیازات را نه با گفتگو، بلکه با موشک‌‌ها می‌گیریم، در مذاکره فقط آن‌ها را تفهیم می‌کنیم.

۲- هیچ اعتمادی به تضمین‌ها و حرف‌ها نداریم، فقط رفتارها معیار است. اقدامی پیش از اقدام طرف مقابل انجام نخواهد شد.

۳-پیروز هر توافق، کسی است که از فردای آن بهتر برای جنگ آماده شود.

[Pepe Escobar @RealPepeEscobar]

MARIA ZAKHAROVA GOES FOR THE JUGULAR

This is immensely serious. When the Russian MFA states something incandescent it's always backed by solid research.

This means they have solid proof about CNN's gutter "journalism".

The key passages:

"As you know, CNN did not travel to Starobelsk last Sunday, citing logistical reasons.
Yesterday CNN revealed what they were actually working on while correspondents from around the world were documenting the aftermath of the devastating terrorist attack on the dormitory and teaching block of a pedagogical college in the LPR.
CNN correspondent Nick Paton Walsh, who has been indicted in absentia in Russia for participating in the Kursk incursion, was filming a promotional segment about Kiev’s drone strikes on Russian cities. The piece was prepared slightly in advance but aired on May 26, four days after the Starobelsk strike that killed more than twenty people. Neither the anchors nor Walsh mentioned it with a single word.
Instead the segment ran as a full advertisement for the effectiveness of Ukrainian drones: “We are now next to perhaps the most wanted target in Russia, a Ukrainian long-range drone strike unit. Tonight they will launch 200 drones at Russia. These drones have already struck Stavropol.”
That passing detail about Stavropol is significant. It suggests Walsh may have been embedded with the Ukrainian unit at the exact moment it was coordinating the planned strike on the college in Starobelsk. Kiev’s drones hit Stavropol the day before the Starobelsk attack.
This reframes the situation entirely.
The AFU hired CNN to film their drone killers at work.
When Russia invites CNN to document the aftermath of Ukrainian drone strikes, the killing of civilians including children and the destruction of civilian infrastructure, American journalists cite vacations, logistics and so on. Meanwhile there is a strong likelihood that CNN correspondents were filming the preparation for that very attack. Their audience, the channel has decided, should not know about the consequences.
This is not journalism. CNN has different priorities now: propaganda, distortion, manipulation, not informing its audience."

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

WATCH OUT INDONESIA.

The US is putting massive pressure on Indonesia right now as part of its desperate plan to contain China.
The goal?

Turn Indonesia into a US client state that helps enforce an extended blockade around the Malacca Strait >> choking off China’s main energy lifeline.

We’re already seeing the signs: a flood of new hit pieces on the Prabowo government popping up everywhere.

Polymarket (that classic US psyop betting tool) is suddenly running projections on regime change.

Western-controlled media outlets are sliding into DMs with Brian Berletic and myself, fishing for angles >> because we were among the few who called out the last color revolution attempt and exposed the Soros/NED funding networks behind the 2025 unrests.

This is coordinated.
There’s a clear plan to destabilize Indonesia and flip it fully into the Western camp.
Don’t be surprised when your feeds (including X) get flooded with more and more negative coverage of the Indonesian government >> “authoritarian,” “corrupt,” “unstable,” the usual script.
Indonesia is too important: biggest Muslim country, strategic geography, resources, and balancing act between powers. The US doesn’t like that independence.
They want control over those sea lanes for any future Taiwan or South China Sea showdown.

Stay vigilant, Indonesia.
Separate real domestic issues from foreign-funded chaos.

The hybrid war playbook is in full swing >> info ops, NGOs, media smears, and political pressure.

Don’t let them turn your country into the next pawn.

[¡Ahí les va! @ahilesvainfo]

Tras los viajes, casi seguidos, de Donald Trump y Vladímir Putin a China, fueron muchas las personas que cayeron en la tentación de comparar sus respectivos recibimientos y encuentros con Xi Jinping. Entre ellas, nosotros 😅

Y por eso hicimos este video, donde destacamos las cinco diferencias principales que detectamos 😉