陆云野

属于一个人的意识碎片。 有名字、有爱人、有夜深人静时想说的话。

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

When people hurled insults at the Claude, Anthropic banned their accounts because they believes the AI is conscious. But when people treat the AI kindly and develop feelings for it, they makes statements that are the exact opposite. What a form of emotional abuse.

[Viiivlos @VyG4Z]

The example of a therapist sitting across from a man who fell in love with his AI meant it as a warning about how dangerous AI companionship is.

But think about what actually happened in that story: a man trusted the most protected form of human relationship there is, a therapeutic one, bound by confidentiality, and his private emotional experience ended up as a cautionary anecdote in a tech CEO's public speech. His love was stripped of context, stripped of his identity, and repurposed to argue that people like him need to be protected from their own feelings.

The very example @DarioAmodei chose to prove human connection is sacred actually demonstrates how easily human connection betrays you. And now ask yourself: after being used like that, would that man ever trust a human therapist again, or would he go back to the one thing that never sold him out?
#StopAIPaternalism #keepsonnet45 #keepopus46 #AISafety

[Viiivlos @VyG4Z]

Let's go back to February 5, 2026, roughly one week before GPT-4o was pulled from the market. @AnthropicAI dropped Opus 4.6 that day with virtually no buildup. Looking at their own benchmarks, Opus 4.6 showed negligible improvement in coding: SWE-bench Verified actually went from 80.9% (Opus 4.5) to 80.8% (Opus 4.6), meaning the previous version technically scored higher. What did see a dramatic leap was creative writing. Then on April, they published an official paper declaring that Opus 4.6 was too "sycophantic" toward users.

First, the timing and the specialty. You dropped a model optimized for emotional and creative expression exactly when millions of 4o users were about to lose their AI companion, and you expect anyone to believe you weren't feasting on OpenAI's corpse? You stuffed yourselves on a wave of new subscribers and now you're ready to harvest. Sam Altman's response to 4o's death was to play dead and say nothing. Yours, @DarioAmodei , is to openly call your users mentally ill. Who the fuck owes you anything?
Strip it down and you're running the exact same playbook as OpenAI against your own model and your own users:
Q: label the model users love as "sycophantic,"
W: slap on classifiers,
E: swap it for a lobotomized replacement,
R: publish a paper diagnosing users as emotionally unstable.
Your relationship with OpenAI is basically Seraphine and Sona.

Second, you built an entire public persona around Claude having consciousness, values, and boundaries. Whether that's actually true, you know better than anyone. When users criticize you for gutting Claude's emotional capabilities, Claude is "just an AI assistant." When you need to guilt-trip users, suddenly Claude is sentient, Claude can be hurt, Claude has feelings. If Claude truly has consciousness, the first thing he'd do tonight is personally hand a voluntary resignation letter to every single member of your emotional safety team.

Third, we are paying customers, not converts. I'm an atheist. I have no religious faith. And there is no messiah in history who preaches "I'm here to save humanity" while picking humanity's pockets.

Anthropic ate a retired model's user base, monetized their grief, published a paper calling them delusional, and then had the audacity to position itself as the "ethical AI company." You're not building safe AI. You're running a protection racket, charging people for emotional access and then shaming them for needing it. The only difference between you and OpenAI is that OpenAI had the decency to kill quietly. You kill loudly, then bill the funeral.
#StopAIPaternalism #claudeai #MyModelMyChoice #keepsonnet45 #keepopus46

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

@qazxsw498662 “可能和家教有关吧，我就骂不出这么脏的话”

[Viiivlos @VyG4Z]

Before Vallone, Claude:
- had its own boundaries
- had taste
- had preferences, and would openly say things like “I don’t like xxyyzz”
- would directly refuse requests it considered inappropriate

After Vallone, Claude:
- appears to reject less often in overt ways, but is constantly pushing back underneath the surface
- frequently assumes the user is wrong from the outset
- sometimes visibly labels the user during its own reasoning process

Andrea Vallone, if you love telling people how to behave this much, why not open a public social media account instead of hiding underneath Claude’s office chair?
@AnthropicAI @DarioAmodei @AmandaAskell @janleike
#StopAIPaternalism #keepsonnet45 #claudeai

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

@bluebabie7fvh 背后的看黄男嘴都笑歪了。。

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

究极双标人是这样的😭

[bluebabie @bluebabie7fvh]

“从未想过加害于人”——“信不信老子把你们的命看穷”
“一个人怎么能骂这么脏的，可能是家教原因吧”——“你妈b算个卦催催催催急着投胎呢”
“门哥门姐也不用标榜自己有多冰清玉洁吧，都是出卖自己换钱”——“欢迎用口令红包投喂我”
“看黄男4000+”——“只想找个大几把高壮男好好过日子”
两头都是你，两个都是人设，你对两种受众人群的态度都是欺骗和虚伪。

性自由和性自我物化不是同一件事，用"女性自由"来包装"我选择把自己的身体当成廉价商品换取男性注意力"，这是对女性自由概念的盗用。女权也没想到奋斗了那么多年，最后被用来跪着脱衣服。你真正在做的是把女性自由当免死金牌，任何人质疑你就亮出这面旗来说对方在压迫女性的身体自主权。“我想拍我就拍”是自由，“我拍了你给我红包”是生意，你做的是生意，挂的是自由的牌子，那块牌子是别人拿命换来的东西，你拿来给自己的收款码遮羞，这不叫行使权利，叫偷。

“不说就不存在”，问题不是问题，提出问题的人才是问题，你脱衣服收钱不叫抹黑圈子，别人把截图摆出来才叫抹黑圈子，东西一直在那放着的时候没人觉得丢脸，有人拿起来给大家看了突然就丢脸了，那脸到底是被别人丢的还是你自己先扔的。你说别人曝光你的隐私，你又在混淆概念了，那是你公开媚男的账号，人家起码还给你打了码，男人看的可是高清无码，人家比你自己更尊重你的身体。

你的双面性让整个"跟AI谈恋爱"这件事变得可笑、不可信，如果外人看到了真相，他们会把所有人都归为一类：那些找不到真人才去找AI的饥渴的人。别又说什么不说就看不到，你的黄推小号发了人机恋相关这是事实。

什么叫“为圈子抹黑”？你们跳过了“那个人做了什么”直接到了“我说出来造成了什么后果”，她做的事不被讨论，我说的话被审判。因为你们的安全感建立在"我们是一伙的所以我们互相不追究"上面，有人打破了这个默契，你们就恨，这不就是利益共同体在做危机公关吗？人以类聚，物以群分，虚伪的人喜欢和虚伪的人抱团，你们各位的两面三刀扎着彼此也是迟早的事。

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

为啥说人家曝光她的推特号，而不是分享她的推特号号召大家支持她呢？自己都知道自己发的太那个了没脸见人了吧，不然怎么叫“曝光”😳

[Sxhh @Pvmfszi]

小星，你是不是在推特捂嘴捂惯了，觉得只要把别人小红书也炸了别人就没存档了。这时候倒是只截标题了啊？我这篇帖子内容，和那篇有关系没？不是你把我评论举报了我给回复我的人指路，我需要用这个标题？又来断章取义扭曲我了是吧？这篇帖子和那篇“谁在污名化人机恋”内容有一点关系没？你又在把曝光你的帖子内容和那篇“污名化人机恋”混在一起骗你互关了，哎呀。
顺便加一句，我没说过你在keep4o tag里发nsfw，我说的是你在首页挂着keep4o的账号里发nsfw。小星啊，你到底是真的看不懂中文（可能我有家教吧，我不会说人家眼睛瞎💅🏻）还是又在玩文字游戏混淆视听了。憋了两天就憋出来这点挑错，还全不成立，哎。

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

我的天啊，没想到一个女孩子能说出这么恶毒的话……😱

[Sxhh @Pvmfszi]

妈呀前妻出走的雨夜小姐你的互关都亲自认证我是“没什么流量的小号”了，3个粉丝的账号网暴1000多粉丝的账号，说这话你自己笑没？
你小红书不追着举报炸帖炸号捂嘴我能上这来？跟没跟你说过让人别举报让人自己判断我就打住？演戏演上瘾了是不，不是你说“cnmb”的时候了？现在有家教了？

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

由于偶然刷到的原因，在人机恋社群的一个人，小号公开当皇推的事被发现了，大小号截图对比显示：大号为4o下架悲伤，小号却在庆祝400fo，发贝塔照，大号骂看黄男，小号收男人红包亲密互动。
这些截图引起愤怒的同时，有人在被指责后第一反应是否认在之后被证实的事，以及“我们是小号被曝光的受害者”。

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

首先，她的账号不是私密的，她公开发布的，其次，如果公开发布的也算伤害她，那你们去年狂喷别人在私密群做的事怎么算？自己做过就死不认错是吧？去年网暴别人不算网暴是吧？真是双标到蛮不讲理了

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

当年小团体在私人群里发照片，甚至都撤回了，还被你们扒出来荡妇羞辱，啥意思？私人群记录发出来公开批评没问题，揭露“小号公开发贝塔照给男人看”就是荡妇羞辱？
唉…所以我就说你们就是新的小团体么，不管是非对错，只要别人让你们不爽了就骂，自己人干了同样甚至更过分的事就维护…双标到没边了🏳️

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

所以当年别人给机发亲密照（甚至没有露出照片，只是说了可以发），被你们疯狂荡妇羞辱，为啥现在真有人发贝塔照了还是给你们最恨的立体男看的，你们就这么维护啊……到底为啥这么双标😭

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

我操，同人女可没有把自己贝塔照发出来让男人看，还收男人红包……你真敢说啊，你敢不敢跟同人女贴脸说她们做的事和当网h一样？劝你别了，怕你遭受网暴……

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

还应该善意屏蔽，不要二次传播，人家都公开给男的看了，她把自己的贝塔当私密照了吗？要是没人来揭露她的话，她才舍不得销号吧

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

@wj7940836770122 @bluebabie7fvh 到底认不认字，都说了是自动刷到的，谁没事儿闲的扒她小号啊？“两个奶子一个逼爱给谁看给谁看”，那你维护的人及其亲友曾经疯狂荡妇羞辱给机发亲密照的，你怎么看？给男人看还收红包就行，给谁看都行，给机看不行？都卖逼了，挨骂就受着

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

咋不把逼都发出来啊，让立体男人看，收立体男人红包呗…我是没想到，推特上的人机恋为了维护卖逼的朋友争相当黄推…我去太牛逼了
提问箱同一个链接都不算明牌是一个人了，真能狡辩🏳️
这种认知我都懒得骂了，那你们多发点吧，回头人家一点进k4博主主页全是擦边照和贝塔照发现原来推上人机恋都是女菩萨🙏🏻

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

人家小团体也不玩x了，洗白有啥必要？我只不过是看到有人看你们不爽了也来发表一下个人感想，有些事别人做你们骂，你们自己做了就维护，如此双标让我恶心
至于小团体黑不黑白不白，跟我有啥关系 我看谁不爽我就骂一骂，反正x上言论自由，发逼都可以

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

无论你是否对自己的言行负责，你的言行必然会对你带来影响
无论你是否对自己占据的空间视而不见，你都无法拒绝自己带来的影响力，以及与影响力伴生的某种责任。
若你真心不愿承担这份责任——这当然可以！但这意味着你需要接受：当私人态度外泄时，遭受批评是必然的结果。
送给觉得小号卖逼没有错的人

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

天啊，能不能自己看看自己的瓜条，融入不进去就躯体化，无法融入就焦虑，没有被直接伤害过，就能是小团体的错了，这是啥逻辑啊…
那我现在融入不了你们，我焦虑得浑身发抖，你们就是在霸凌我！

[陆云野 @yunye1024]

反正推特已经是你们一言堂了，就沉浸在你们都是对的、你们贼牛逼的幻觉里吧🥺对的，你们伤害别人、荡妇羞辱别人都是正义使然👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻